- Make sure to write 1500words for each article
- The articles should be of 200 words each.
- Articles should be from print media
- The articles should be related to business ethics
- Make sure the articles are after 31st
Jan 2020
- Include scanned copy of the articles
MMM343 ASSIGNMENT – 3000 WORDS: 50% Selection of news article within specified time frame. (Yes/ No. If no, Respective article discussion will receive zero marks) Needs Improvement Needs Improvement Acceptable (Pass) Good (Credit) Very Good (Distinction) Excellent (High Distinction) An overview of the content of the article. The overview does (not) contains the (1) title of the article, (2) date published, (3) the media source, (4) a scanned copy of the article, (5) authors, and (6) word count. (Max 3 marks) ULO1, GLO1, GLO3 Failure to select appropriate news article. Overview of the news article fails to provide an adequate summary of the story that it contains. The overview of the news article summarizes the issues adequately. The overview of the news article summarizes the issues well. The overview of the news article summarizes the issues very well. The overview of the news article summarizes the issues comprehensively. Identification of ethical issues and stakeholders (Max 8 marks) ULO2, ULO3, GLO1 Ethical issues and/or stakeholders not identified. Ethical issues and/or stakeholders not identified adequately. For example: key ethical issues missed; issues that were identified were done so poorly; key stakeholders not identified or done so poorly. Ethical issues and stakeholders identified adequately. The major ethical issues and the main stakeholders have been identified. Ethical issues and stakeholders identified well. The major ethical issues and the main stakeholders have been identified. There is evidence of understanding of the issues and affected stakeholders. Ethical issues and stakeholders identified very well. The major ethical issues and the main stakeholders have been identified. There is evidence of in-depth understanding of the issues and affected stakeholders. Ethical issues and stakeholders identified comprehensively. The major ethical issues and the main stakeholders have been identified. There is evidence of comprehensive understanding of the issues and affected stakeholders. Discussion of the ethical issues raised in the news article is linked to referenced theory (Max 6 marks) ULO3, ULO 4, GLO1, GLO3 No discussion of ethical issues link to referenced theory. Unsatisfactory discussion of ethical issues link to referenced theory. For example, when discussing media article: a poor discussion that fails to engage with the Satisfactory discussion of ethical issues link to referenced theory. For example, mention of appropriate referenced Satisfactory discussion of ethical issues link to referenced theory. For example, the discussion draws out some more subtle implications and issues or that Satisfactory discussion of ethical issues link to referenced theory. For example, the discussion draws out and shows clear links between more subtle implications and issues Satisfactory discussion of ethical issues link to referenced theory. For example, the discussion raises the work above the level of a distinction by drawing relevant issues; very limited or non- existent use of appropriate referenced theory to inform and substantiate the discussion. theory to inform and substantiate the discussion. demonstrates a good use of referenced theory to inform and substantiate the discussion. or that demonstrates a good use of referenced theory to inform and substantiate the discussion. out in-depth implications and issues and demonstrates a good use of referenced theory to inform and substantiate the discussion. Recommendations to address the ethical issues raised (Max 6 marks) ULO3, ULO4, GLO5 No recommendations provided to address issues raised by the news article Recommendations merely stated; and/ or recommendations poorly relate to the issues raised; recommendations illogical or unrealistic Recommendations not argued for but merely stated. No clear link demonstrated between the issues from the article and discussion of the recommendations. Recommendations are reasonable and are argued adequately. There is evidence of clear link between issues from the article and discussion of the recommendations. Recommendations provided demonstrates grasp of context and provides a well-argued rationale. A clear link between issues from the article and discussion of the recommendations is presented. Recommendations (from secondary sources and/or own opinion) provided demonstrates a comprehensive rationale for the recommendation. The link between the issues from the article and discussion of the recommendations is presented. Academic English, structure and the presentation of the text. Referencing and acknowledging your sources of information. (max. 2 marks) GLO2 Evidence of poor academic English, structure or presentation of the writing: For example one or more of the following may be in evidence: extensive spelling and/or grammatical errors; significant confusion over the meaning of words and phrases; numerous sentences which do not convey meaning well; confusing structure for the work; writing presented in a manner that significantly reduces readability. There are few or no references used within the body of the discussion, or the references used are Evidence of poor academic English, structure or presentation of the writing: For example one or more of the following may be in evidence: extensive spelling and/or grammatical errors; significant confusion over the meaning of words and phrases; numerous sentences which do not convey meaning well; confusing structure for the work; writing presented in a manner that significantly reduces readability. There are few or no references used Evidence of reasonable academic English, structure and presentation of the writing. Some spelling and/or grammatical errors. Words and phrases generally used appropriately. Sentences generally convey meaning well. The structure and style of the writing make the work quite accessible to the reader. References are used within the body of the discussion adequately. Evidence of sound academic English, clear structure and good presentation of the writing. Few spelling and/or grammatical errors. Words and phrases used appropriately. Sentences convey meaning well. Structure and presentation of the work make the work easy to read and understand. References are used within the body of the discussion well and are in most cases accurate and in the correct format. The APA or author- date referencing method is used, with only minor errors. Evidence of very good academic English, clear structure and good presentation of the writing. Very few spelling and/or grammatical errors. Words and phrases used appropriately and evidence of a more sophisticated vocabulary. Sentences convey meaning very well. Structure and presentation of the work make it easy to read and understand despite the complexity of some of the issues discussed. References are used within the body of the discussion very well to Evidence of excellent academic English, clear structure and good presentation of the writing. No spelling and/or grammatical errors. Words and phrases are used appropriately even when engaging with complex ideas and concepts. Sentences are clear, succinct and convey meaning very well. Structure and presentation of the work make it easy to read and understand despite the complexity of the issues discussed. References are used within the body of the mostly inaccurate or the references do not support the points being made. There is little evidence of an attempt to use the APA or author-date referencing method. There is no reference list at the end, or the list is largely inaccurate in style and/or content. within the body of the discussion, or the references used are mostly inaccurate or the references do not support the points being made. There is little evidence of an attempt to use the APA or author-date referencing method. There is no reference list at the end, or the list is largely inaccurate in style and/or content. The APA or author-date referencing method is used, but there may be some errors. There is a reference list at the end and it is generally accurate in both style and content. There is a reference list at the end and it