1 by 8%, loads on F2 by 80%, loads on F3 by 15% and loads onF4 by 15%. Similarly, the number of load customers on each feeder are also increasewith the same percentage, but to a rounded integer...

1 by 8%, loads on F2 by 80%, loads on F3 by 15% and loads on F4 by 15%. Similarly, the number of load customers on each feeder are also increase with the same percentage, but to a rounded integer number. Then, evaluate load point and system reliability indices. You need to also show these results and use when you will do cost/benefit analysis in the upgrading in the next step, in the following. b) Now, we assume that at the end of each four main feeders there is a 5MW solar PV farm with an average output power of 2.454MW for 1/3 of every day in a year. For reliability improvement, conduct a cost benefit analysis for three alternative network reinforcement (upgrade) options to enhance network reliability indices. The three planning choices you propose need to be practically feasible and technically making sense. Search and read some of the available reports/articles regarding utility distribution planning reinforcement on reliability improvements to get more realistic perspectives. Perform economic appraisal among the choices you make in bringing the system reliability back and close to part 1 performance indices. Based on your findings and analysis, then discuss and justify your final choice. This part worth 35% marks. Please note: for part 2 use “2 hours” for the average N/O switching time. Also, in all the part 2 calculations, do NOT apply without N/O switch. As noted, all calculations should be in excel spreadsheet designed prof