Brief
1 Unit BISY2005/ISY2005/ISY205 Enterprise Systems Assessment Type Report Assessment Number Two Assessment Name Weighting Case Study 25% (20% for report and 5% for presentation) Alignment with Unit and Course Unit Learning Outcomes Graduate Attributes Assessed ULO 1: Show an understanding of the basic principles and issues associated with enterprise systems. ULO 2: Explain and describe the scope of common enterprise systems (e.g. supply chain, HRM, procurement, etc.) ULO 3: Identify and critically assess the challenges associated with implementing enterprise systems and their impact on business. ULO 4: Demonstrate an understanding of the enterprise system development life cycle, from selection, acquisition, implementation, and maintenance. ULO 5: Identify the factors that contribute to an organisation’s readiness to implement enterprise systems and how obstacles might be overcome. GA 2: Collaboration GA 3: Research GA 4: Critical Thinking GA 5: Ethical Behaviour GA 6: Flexibility Due Date/Time Week 12 Online Moodle Submission; 18th October 2019 5:00pm (AEST) Assessment Description Case studies assess students’ understanding of concepts presented in weekly lectures and tutorials by researching and analysing real life situations. This is a group assignment. In this assignment, groups of 4 students are required to identify a recent Enterprise Systems implementation in an organisation and write a 2,500 to 3,000-word report and deliver a 15-minute PowerPoint presentation on the following issues depicted in the chosen case study. Email your choices to the Lecturer for approval. 1. Describe the organisation and explain the problem or opportunity it faced. 2. Describe the nature of the Enterprise Systems that the organisation adopted and the process by which it was selected and implemented. 3. Explain and analyse any difficulties the organisation may have faced in adopting the system. 4. Provide an assessment of how successful the adoption of the Enterprise Systems was and a discussion of any success metrics that were used. 2 You are required to use additional references to support your arguments. READ THE GROUP WORK GUIDELINES IN THE APPENDIX Peer Review Forms EACH member of the group is to submit a Peer Review Form in the Moodle Assignment Submission Tool. See the Appendix for instructions on group member performance. Presentation The individual groups will have 15 minutes to present their report. All the group members are required to participate in this task and need to collaborate to ensure that the whole presentation is cohesive. The Lecturer will require a STAPLED hard copy of the presentation (in addition to the soft copy Moodle submission via Turnitin) Detailed Submission Requirements Online Moodle Submission via Turnitin. Before submission, you ensure the submitted work satisfies the following requirements: The assignment is to be written in a report format. It must have separate sections for each of the FOUR tasks above. The report should additionally, include an Executive Summary, Table of Contents, Introduction, Conclusion and References Submit as a PDF file through the Turnitin assignment submission tool on Moodle. Include a cover sheet that has your name, subject, date, report title and WORD COUNT The assignment should not exceed 2,800 words with a minimum of 2,500 words, excluding references. Special consideration Students whose ability to submit or attend an assessment item is affected by sickness, misadventure or other circumstances beyond their control, may be eligible for special consideration. No consideration is given when the condition or event is unrelated to the student's performance in a component of the assessment, or when it is considered not to be serious. Students applying for special consideration must submit the form within 3 days of the due date of the assessment item or exam. The form can be obtained from the AIH website (https://aih.nsw.edu.au/current- students/student-forms/) or on-campus at Reception. The request form must be submitted to Student Services. Supporting evidence should be attached. For further information please refer to the Student Assessment Policy and associated Procedure available on (https://aih.nsw.edu.au/about-us/policies-procedures/). https://aih.nsw.edu.au/current-students/student-forms/ https://aih.nsw.edu.au/current-students/student-forms/ https://aih.nsw.edu.au/about-us/policies-procedures/ 3 . Referencing and Plagiarism It is essential to use IN TEXT referencing. If you are using the exact words from a reference then you must use quotation marks. You can use Harvard Style referencing, with a listing at the end of the essay. http://www.citethisforme.com/harvard-referencing Remember that this is a Turnitin assignment and plagiarism will be subject to severe penalties. Please refer to the AIH Academic Misconduct Policy: https://aih.nsw.edu.au/wp- content/uploads/2017/11/StudentAcademic-Misconduct-Policy.pdf DO NOT COPY AND PASTE FROM THE INTERNET OR COPY OTHER STUDENTS’ WORK! http://www.citethisforme.com/harvard-referencing https://aih.nsw.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/StudentAcademic-Misconduct-Policy.pdf https://aih.nsw.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/StudentAcademic-Misconduct-Policy.pdf 4 Rubric for Report (20 marks) Requirements Total High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Pass Fail Depth and Breadth of Coverage Demonstrating understanding or interpretation of key concepts of enterprise systems initiatives in the chosen organisation, the implementation challenges and criteria for success 10% All aspects of the question are addressed in depth. Most aspects of the question are addressed in depth. Most aspects of the question are addressed adequately. Basic aspects of the question are addressed adequately. Responses are superficial and / or inadequately addressed the question. 8.5 to 10 7.5 to 8.4 6.5 to 7.4 5 to 6.4 0 to 4.9 Critical Elements 5% The written work shows great depth of thought, excellent development of argument, logical analysis and insight into the subject. The written work shows some evidence of analysis, supported by logical argument and insight into the subject. The written work shows evidence of elementary analysis and the development of argument. The written work is mainly descriptive, showing basic understanding of the topic. The written work demonstrates limited understanding of the topic. 4.3 to 5 3.8 to 4.2 3.3 to 3.7 2.5 to 3.2 0 to 2.4 Structure, Language and Conventions 5% All aspects of the written work conform to a high academic / professional standard. Most aspects of the written work conform to a high academic / professional standard. Most aspects of the written work conform to an acceptable academic / professional standard. The written work displays basic structure. The written work is not of an academic / professional standard. 4.3 to 5 3.8 to 4.2 3.3 to 3.7 2.5 to 3.2 0 to 2.4 5 Rubric for Presentation (5 marks) Requirements Total High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Pass Fail Ability to Explain & Clarify Demonstrating understanding or interpretation of key concepts of enterprise systems initiatives in the chosen organisation, the implementation challenges and criteria for success 3% All aspects of the question are addressed in depth. Most aspects of the question are addressed in depth. Most aspects of the question are addressed adequately. Basic aspects of the question are addressed adequately. Responses are superficial and / or inadequately addressed the question. 2.55 to 3 2.25 to 2.54 1.95 to 2.24 1.5 to 1.94 0 to 1.4 Speaker's Insight & Understanding 1% The presentation demonstrated deep understanding and comprehension of the topic. There was clear evidence of independent thought and reflection on topic. The presentation demonstrated sound understanding and comprehension of most aspects of the topic. The presentation demonstrated good understanding and comprehension of most aspects of the topic. The presentation demonstrated basic understanding and comprehension of most of the topic. The presentation did not demonstrate sufficient understanding and comprehension of the topic. 0.85 to 1 0.75 to 0.84 0.65 to 0.74 0.5 to 0.64 0 to 0.49 Method of Delivery 1% The topic was covered in a highly professional and organised manner. The presenter displayed excellent verbal skills and delivered a highly interesting, coherent presentation at an appropriate level for the audience. The topic was covered in a professional and organised manner. The presenter displayed good verbal skills and mostly delivered an interesting coherent presentation at an appropriate level for the audience. The topic was covered in an organised manner. The presenter displayed adequate verbal skills and mostly delivered a coherent presentation at an appropriate level for the audience. The topic was covered in a basic manner. The presenter displayed minimal standards of verbal skills and / or coherence and organisation. The topic was not covered acceptably and / or poorly organised. Verbal skills were inadequate. 0.85 to 1 0.75 to 0.84 0.65 to 0.74 0.5 to 0.64 0 to 0.49