Abishek,
The report has demonstrated a sound research skills.
The main issue with this report is that you don't have research methodology section presented. Therefore it is unclear whether or not the correct methods were employed to answer the RQs
The writing and the referencing also has an impact on the quality of the report. Pls improve these skills, as it will improve the quality of your report.
17/10/18
Dr.E.Lanasier
Moderated by the UC. Dr Sardana Khan
Immigration BUSN20019 Assessment 2 Effect of immigration in employment rate in Australia Unit Coordinator Dr. Sardana Khan Student Name Abhishek Kumar Student ID 12069628 Contents Effect of immigration in employment rate in Australia1 Project title3 Introduction3 Background3 Justification3 Aims/Objectives4 Research Questions4 Quality and coherence of introduction and conclusion4 Critical literature review5 A detailed presentation of how you carried out your project7 Findings9 Discussion12 Conclusion, including recommendations and limitations17 References19 Project title Effect of immigration in employment rate in Australia Introduction Background Immigration was significantly less efficient in Australia than in 1995. There is competition among less-skilled domestic workers and new immigrants and subsequent cuts in the migration intakes than the recession (Abelson & Dalton, 2018). From the mid-1990s, historical changes in birth rate, increasing participation in third education, and increasing number of improvements and comparatively faster reconstitution of skill levels of labour demand to produce a skilled labour supply crisis in Australia. The permanent, as well as temporary skilled migration policies established by the Australian Government since 1995, have played a special role in meeting labour demand, especially in the years of the first decade of the first decade of the 21st century. As this is a relatively new phenomenon, it is important to provide the historical context that has led up to this outcome (Antoniades, Mazza & Brijnath, 2018). The purpose of the analysis is to provide a demographic accounting of changes in employment. As such, the analysis focuses on the supply of employment rather than demand. The impacts of immigration on Australian especially on their wages moreover on their employment prospects is a question that can incite hot and emotional debate. The effects of anecdotes and intestines can easily dominate both sides of the public (Atalay, Kim & Whelan, 2014). Justification The following are the benefits of organizing this research proposal: · This research will help those who want to understand how immigration affects the Australian economy. Also, they should take into account the mechanisms through which immigration conditions impact (Bardsen, Hurn & McHugh, 2010). · This research proposal will also help in understanding how immigration status shapes the Australian economy and performance. · Research results obtained from this research proposal will be used for business owners, researchers, and policymakers. Aims/Objectives This paper examines the impact of the immigration on the employment in Australia Research Questions RQ1: What impact did immigrants have on employment and Australia's economy? RQ2: How much and how much do you help to improve employment and the economy of Australia? Quality and coherence of introduction and conclusion This research study is consistent because this research provides deep insights that immigration provides major benefits and some problems to the Australian economy (Berry, 2009). On the other hand, strong labor or workforce demand is likely to maintain migration at a moderately high level in the coming years; it is to make plans for the population growth impact on the government's infrastructure as well as resources at a rapid pace. To reach the identified objectives and objectives, it is necessary to follow a group of methods (comprehensive literature review, quantitative and qualitative data) to reach the desired results (Campolieti, 2012). Critical literature review Migrants from the Middle East moreover North Africa is three times more likely to be surely out of the work in the first five years of settling European or Asian immigrants and 35% unemployment rate is six times higher than the national average (Gewin, 2013). Islamic Migration Specialists have blamed the sky-high unemployment rate on those owners who left the jobseeker called "Mohammed" and women wearing hijab. The latest ABS data shows that Middle Eastern immigrants are having much more difficulty finding jobs compared to other immigrants (Hava & Erturgut, 2010). After living here for five to nine years, the unemployment rates of Asian and European immigrants are also lower than that of Australian cultivation workers. But among the job seekers in the Middle East, the unemployment rate has reached 17.5%. On the contrary, Southeast Asian immigrants were 3.6%, and Southern Europe and Eastern Europe were 1.9% (KARANASSOU & SALA, 2009). Australian National University economist Bob Gregory said most of the Middle Eastern immigrants are refugees and English language skills are "important" to find a job. Recent Immigration Survey includes detailed information on Australian immigrants and their performance after arrival in the last 10 years. These topics include how immigrant employs jobs and it is likely that they will get a job related to their visa type, education, language skills or other specialties (Mavisakalyan, 2012). In November 2016, Australia's population of 15 years and older was 19.1 million. Approximately 6.8 million (35%) of these were born overseas. (Table 1) Approximately 1.9 million people born abroad came to Australia in 2006 and reached the age of 15 on arrival. This is 10% of the total population of 15 years and above. Among them, by November 2016, 254,600 Australian or New Zealand citizens were either before coming or catching New Zealand citizenship. This group has not been included in this group. The remaining 1.7 million people are a recent immigrant or temporary resident who is the centre of this review (Meng & Deng, 2013). Immigration has been a major contributor to the development of Australian workers. In 1991, 26% of staff strength was immigrant, and 13% were Australian born children. A large percentage of these immigrants come from the UK and continental Europe, though Asian immigrants are more important in the recent wave of immigration (Uhlendorff & Zimmermann, 2014). This change in Australian immigrant country reflects changes in Australian immigration policy and supply and demand factors in the global economy. One of the important ideas in this regard is the potential for Australia's economic success. Although the net effect of this immigration decision depends on the relative extent of economic well-being in the country of origin and destination, the first step to understanding its importance is to check the financial well-being of immigrants in the country (Wright, 2013). The main determinant of economic welfare is whether a person has a job or not. Therefore, the result of immigration employment is the centre of this study. The result of Australian immigrant employment is the subject of a series of studies based on the data collected in the 1980s. These studies show that in the first few years after coming to Australia, immigrants had experienced relatively high unemployment rates, but this loss disappeared because most of the groups survive for a long time. However, due to these studies, the Australian labour market has declined and the immigration portfolio is moving to Asia (Zelekha, 2013). Therefore to determine whether the results of earlier research in the labour market in the 1990s were the centre of research or not. In addition, progress in the research methods used in previous studies is now possible, and one of the features of current research is that differences between the Australian-born and non-immigrant groups are divided into differences in factors that are considered appropriate and inappropriate as proposed can be ideal (Abelson & Dalton, 2018). A detailed presentation of how you carried out your project The study data comes from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. This paper uses the survival method to decompose the employment growth in Australia in the five years from 2011 to 2016: (1) changes in age and gender distribution without immigration; (2) changes in employment participation rates by age and sex; (3) Net immigration by age and sex (Antoniades, Mazza & Brijnath, 2018). The input data for this study is: 1. Estimated Resident Population (ERP) for five age groups and genders in Australia on June 30, 2011, and June 30, 2016. The ERP value used is an estimate before the 2016 census results. 2. Australian Bureau of Statistics announced the employment of five-year-old age groups and gender in the July 2011 and July 2016 labour force surveys (ABS 2011, 2016a). 3. Five age groups and gender-specific employment-to-population ratios from the same survey 4. Australian Bureau of Statistics published the Australian Life Table 2013-2015 five-year life table survival rate by age and gender (ABS 2016b). The first step of the method is to use the life table survival rate, and in July 2016, the five-age group and gender as of July 2016 will be forecast for the 2016 Australian resident population. In the oldest age group, the population aged 85 and over survived to the age of 90 and above. In the absence of immigration, this gives rise to the estimated age and gender distribution of the 2016 population (Atalay, Kim & Whelan, 2014). In the second step, the 2011 employment ratio applies to the projected 2016 population. At the oldest age, published data requires the use of age groups 65 and older. This step calculates the number of people employed in Australia without immigration in 2016 and assumes no change in the employment-to-population ratio between 2011 and 2016 (Bardsen, Hurn & McHugh, 2010). This produces the first component: 1. Changes in the number of people used for population growth due to the current age distribution in 2011 and the five-year mortality rate (referred to in this document as “population growth”). In the absence of immigration, Step 3 applies the 2016 employment ratio to the projected population for 2016. This calculates the number of people employed in 2016 without immigration but uses the actual employment ratio in 2016. The difference between the results of steps 3 and 2 produces a second component: 2. Changes in the number of employed people due to changes in the employment ratio (Berry, 2009). The fourth and final stages compare the actual numbers and results of the ages and genders used in 2016. In third step, the difference between the two, the residual, shows the impact of the addition in the migration and any errors (sampling errors in the two surveys; errors in the ERP used to detonate the survey results; hypothetical false deaths). This provides an estimate of the third component: 3. The impact of net migration on the total number of employed persons in 2016 during 2011-2016 (Campolieti, 2012). Regarding the error, the sampling error in the labour force survey is small, and any error caused by the survival rate is negligible because most calculations involve younger ages. Errors in ERP may lead to larger errors, but according to historical standards, the 2016 Census results have little change in ERP (ABS 2017). It should also be noted that the 2016 census adjusted ERP is greater than the pre-census estimate, which means that if the 2016 census adjusted ERP is used to adjust 2016, the remaining (third part) will be greater than here. Estimate the results of the labour force survey (Gewin, 2013). Finally,