all details in pdf and my topic is recently concluded 2018 Gold Coast Commonwealth Games
PPMP20009 Leading Lean Projects Term 2, 2018 Page 1 of 3 Assessment 1 (Individual Work – 40%) Case study: Managing Lean Project Introduction You have been given the task to organise the FIFA 2018 World Cup football tournament (https://www.fifa.com/worldcup). (For those not familiar with football, you may change the event to the recently concluded 2018 Gold Coast Commonwealth Games: https://gc2018.com/). Your tasks This assessment item requires you to work INDIVIDUALLY. 1. As the project manager in charge of delivering such as an important world sporting event: i. Identify and elaborate the following terms with regards to the event. a. Voice of the Customer (VOC) b. Critical to Customer Requirements (CCR) c. Critical to Quality parameters (CTQ) ii. In what ways would you have implemented lean project management for this event? iii. Identify and elaborate processes from PMBOK, PRINCE2, Organisational Project Management, Agile Practices and Lean Six Sigma (DMAIC Methodology) that could support your lean project implementation. 2. Your submission should be made using Microsoft Office documents and the ESSAY submitted as a separate 2,500 - 3,000 word Microsoft WORD document. Text beyond the 3000 word limit WILL NOT BE MARKED. Text length less than 2500 words will be penalised by 5% of the total available marks. 3. Supporting diagrams / figures may be presented in other formats - Excel, PowerPoint slides, PDF documents, as part of the appendix and will not count towards the essay’s word limit. The reference list will also not be included in the word count. 4. Tables should be placed in the essay and shall be included in the word count. 5. Your submission should be a properly constructed to an academic standard. It should contain an effective introduction, body and conclusion. The introduction should introduce the essay and include your argument. The body should present the justification to support your https://www.fifa.com/worldcup https://gc2018.com/ PPMP20009 Leading Lean Projects Term 2, 2018 Page 2 of 3 recommendations, provide your assumptions and finally, provide a conclusion that should restate your recommendations on a high level. 6. The submission should contain a coherent, but necessarily restricted review of the academic literature on the project management topics in question. The literature review should be integrated into the essay, not a separate section. Do not include an executive summary or an abstract. 7. This assessment item involves researching your assigned topic to enhance your understanding of lean project management concepts and utilisation of academic literature. Whilst you use the recommended textbooks and lecture materials, you may also refer to relevant peer reviewed, academic journal articles. A reference list (comprising between 5 – 10 references) formatted in the prescribed APA style is compulsory. PPMP20009 Leading Lean Projects Term 2, 2018 Page 3 of 3 Assessment Criteria Marking Criteria: Your assignment will be assessed on the extent and quality to which it meets each of the following criteria: No Attributes (%) i a) Voice of the Customer (VOC) 2 i b) Critical to Customer Requirements (CCR) 2 i c) Critical to Quality (CTQ) parameters 2 ii) Ways or areas to implement lean project management 8 iii) Identify and elaborate processes from PMBOK, PRINCE2, Organisational Project Management (OPM) Agile Practices and Lean Six Sigma (DMAIC Methodology) that could support your lean project implementation. Best Practices Processes Elaboration Marks available PMBOK 6 PRINCE2 6 OPM 2 Agile 2 Lean Six Sigma 6 22 iv Clarity of expression, grammar, spelling and correct APA style referencing 4 Total 40 Important Information Assessment Due Date Week 9 Monday (10 Sep 2018) 11:55PM AET Type Individual Work Weighting 40% Assessment 1 rubric_v4.xlsx PPMP 20009 Marking Rubric Assessment 1 (Individual ‐ 40%) Fail Developing Competent Accomplished Outstanding Marks Awarded Marker's comments • Totally incorrect identification of VOC The VOC is provided but is difficult to read and understand • There is a clear description of the VOC which includes all the relevant information. • Gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. 0 1 2 • Totally incorrect identification of CCR The CCR is provided but is difficult to read and does not relate to VOC • The CCR is a clear which includes all the relevant information. • Gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. 0 1 2 • Totally incorrect identification of CTQ The CTQ is provided but is difficult to read and does not relate to CCR • The CTQ is clear which includes all the relevant information. • Gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. 0 1 2 • Did not mention any best practices to implement lean project management • Identified ONE best practice to implement lean project management • Describes how the case will be addressed and gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. • Identified TWO best practice to implement lean project management •Describes how the case will be addressed and gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. • Identified THREE best practice to implement lean project management • Describes how the case will be addressed and gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. • Identified more than THREE best practice to implement lean project management • Describes how the case will be addressed and gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. 0 1 ‐ 2 3 ‐4 5 ‐ 6 7 ‐ 8 Marks available (out of 2 marks) Attributes ia) Voice of the customer (VOC) n/a n/a ib)Critical Customer Requirements(CCR) n/a n/a Marks available (out of 2 marks) ic)Critical To Quality (CTQ) n/a n/a Marks available (out of 2 marks) ii) Ways or areas to implement lean project management Marks available (out of 8 marks) Fail Developing Competent Accomplished Outstanding Marks Awarded Marker's commentsAttributes • Level of understanding about selected PMBOK process activities for a lean approach None Limited Satisfactory Clear Excellent Marks available 0 0 ‐ 1.5 1 ‐ 2 2 ‐ 3 3 ‐ 4 • Linking to appropriate PMBOK knowledge area and process groups None None Weak Moderate Strong Marks available 0 0 1 1.5 2 • Level of understanding about selected PRINCE2 processes for a lean approach None Limited Satisfactory Clear Excellent Marks available 0 0 ‐ 1.5 1 ‐ 2 2 ‐ 3 3 ‐ 4 • Linking to appropriate PRINCE2 principle and themes None None Weak Moderate Strong Marks available 0 0 1 1.5 2 • Did not mention any of OPM attributes • Demonstrates satisfactory understanding of OPM • Makes weak connection between the best practice(s) adopted for lean approach • Demonstrates excellent understanding of OPM • Makes strong connection between the best practice(s) adopted for lean approach 0 1 2 • Did not mention any of Agile attributes • Demonstrates satisfactory understanding of Agile • Makes weak connection between the best practice(s) adopted for lean approach • Demonstrates excellent understanding of Agile • Makes strong connection between the best practice(s) adopted for lean approach 0 1 2 • Level of understanding about DMAIC methodology for a lean approach None Limited Satisfactory Clear Excellent Marks available 0 0 ‐ 1.5 2 ‐ 3 3.5 ‐ 4.5 5 ‐ 6 iii) Identify and elaborate processes from PMBOK,PRINCE2,OPM,Agile Practices and Lean Six Sigma (DMAIC Methodology) that could support your lean project implementation PMBOK (out of 6 marks) PRINCE2 (out of 6 marks) Marks available Agile Practices (out of 2 marks) Marks available n/a n/a n/a n/a OPM (out of 2 marks) Lean Six Sigma (out of 6 marks) Fail Developing Competent Accomplished Outstanding Marks Awarded Marker's commentsAttributes • The writing is difficult to follow, with incoherent or illogical arguments. • There are many errors of spelling or grammar. • Sections are unrelated. • No citations are included in the text of the essay, and there is no reference list at the end. • The arguments make sense in places, but there are also illogical arguments, confusing sentences or sudden changes of topic. • There are numerous errors of spelling and grammar. • There is a reference list but it does not comply with APA refererencing style • Most statements are clear but some require re‐ reading and guessing about meaning as they are not clear. • Sentence structure can be improved for simplicity, clarity and ease of comprehension. • Few grammar or spelling errors • APA referencing style is used with some format errors or inconsistencies. • Statements are clear and well‐connected. There is a logical flow of ideas. • Few spelling errors. • APA style is used almost perfectly with few errors or inconsistencies. • Excellent clarity of expression at both the sentence and paragraph levels. • Well‐structured with logical flow of ideas between paragraphs • Citations and References fully comply with APA style. 0 0.5 ‐ 1 1.5 ‐ 2 2.5 ‐ 3 3.5 ‐ 4 Notes: Definition of Criteria Criteria Limited Satisfactory Clear Excellent None Weak Moderate Strong Total marks awarded (out of 40) 0 Linking to PMBOK knowledge areas and process groups or to PRINCE2 principles and themes almost always discussed Linking to PMBOK knowledge areas and process groups or to PRINCE2 principles and themes always discussed Linking to PMBOK knowledge areas and process groups or to PRINCE2 principles and themes not discussed Linking to PMBOK knowledge areas and process groups or to PRINCE2 principles and themes occasionally discussed Definition Mostly incorrect named PMBOK / PRINCE2 / DMAIC process activities / processes and without justification for the use of the processes Correctly named PMBOK / PRINCE2 / DMAIC process activities / processes and with accurate justification for the use of the processes Some occurrence of incorrectly named PMBOK / PRINCE2 / DMAIC process activities / processes and with poor justification for the use of the processes Correctly named PMBOK / PRINCE2 / DMAIC process activities / processes and with somewhat accurate justification for the use of the processes Marks available iv) Clarity of expression, grammar, spelling, final summary and correct APA style referencing (out of 4 marks)