Collins 2 Adam Collins Professor Schwab History of Civilization 1/23/2020 A clash of civilizations - whether occurring among states, nations, or different groups within a nation or state would best...

1 answer below »
Analyze a second primary source you will be using for your paper. Using the P.A.P.E.R. technique as well as guidelines provided by Professor Schwab and your reference sources, discuss how and why your chosen primary source is important to your topic of study. Be sure to address the larger historiographical issues associated with your chosen source. This assignment should be at least 500 words in main text


Collins 2 Adam Collins Professor Schwab History of Civilization 1/23/2020 A clash of civilizations - whether occurring among states, nations, or different groups within a nation or state would best define “war”. Existent since biblical times, war has only transpired more prominently and bloodily throughout the years; Conflicts such as the Israeli-Palestinian crisis and India v. Pakistan are just a couple of issues that society sees still to this day. In order to comprehend the principle of war, examination of sources is necessary to determine not only causes, but all that is encompassed with fighting. Written in the fourth and fifth centuries, was an actual old, delicate letter “On posting a young soldier.”  From the form of this source, this powerful, firsthand documentation serves as an excellent primary source capturing the effects of war: the unknown - will he return alive? This letter exhibits a relationship between two brothers, in which one was sent off to war. Written on old papyrus, this signifies not only how old it was, but the idea of letter-writing has not changed even to this day. Sending letters has developed further with mail trucks, post offices, stamps, and security, but the intention of sending a letter to a loved one retained. Interpreting this documentation, the purpose was to address a brother who has been posted with the Egyptian army.  The author’s message was to showcase an unconditional bond from one brother to another. “I urge you, brother, to write to me about your safety, since I heard at antinoopolis that there has been plague in your neighbourhood” (B.P. Grenfell, p.132). This message is both explicit and implicit. In regards to expressing concern for safety within the letter, would be classified as explicit. Referencing Abraham Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, the letter is implicit for readers as it provides our own sense of ‘love and belonging’ that society seeks to have and be reciprocated (wishing no harm to come to that person) - the unknown - writing this letter and it may be implied that the brother addressed to, could be already dead unfortunately. We don’t know the author specifically or any info such as Race, sex, class, occupation, religion, age, region, political beliefs, but this source documents war in the sense that one may never see their relative again. With analysis of the letter, it appears to not be target towards an intended audience as the correspondence is between two people. Now that it is public, it may open the possibility of sharing the same effect felt when the author wrote it to a reader of the letter. “...I was not able to visit you.”  carefully reading the text the diction of the author presents a deep sadness and longing for his brother. The author does not choose to talk in depth particularly about whatever troubles are happening that the brother soldier may be experiencing. As a historical, descriptive piece of evidence among two ordinary people, this represents the harshness of conflict - having to spend time away from a significant one and not hear from them. A possible question that could be asked of the source - why was it written (more specifically what plague is being referenced within the letter?) The limitations of this source are transparent, as this document was dated back to fourth and fifth century Egypt. As a letter between a soldier and a family member in Egypt, it is apparent that through analysis there is a universal understanding on the idea of war and fighting for a country, but also simultaneously the people who go off to fight may not return.  This letter serves as a concrete example of that.
Answered Same DayFeb 11, 2021

Answer To: Collins 2 Adam Collins Professor Schwab History of Civilization 1/23/2020 A clash of civilizations -...

Kishor answered on Feb 12 2021
146 Votes
Say no to War. what is it good for?
A definition of War is “a state of open, armed, often protracte
d conflict carried on between nations, states, or parties”.
War! What is it good for?" sings Edwin Starr in his 1970 musical composition, afore giving an unequivocal answer: "absolutely nothing."
Whilst this definition is pellucid enough it does not come proximate to exploring the true meaning of war in terms of emotions and the effects of war on humanity. It commences off by sending irreprehensible lives out to war, most of them not kenning that they are going to sacrifice themselves for the cause of their regime. Hundreds if not thousands of irreprehensible people would die each day due to the war, but does not denote that it always justifies the cessation? The answer is big no, imperiling irreprehensible lives is not a debatable issue, it simply is erroneous. In the past century, wars had a relatively very low economic base and money power. From the second a moiety of the 19th...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here