Answer To: Teaching Period 2, 2020 ORG20003: Organisational Behaviour Assignment 2: Case study team report Word...
Kuldeep answered on Aug 29 2021
Human Behavior
Human Behavior
Student Name:
Unit:
University Name:
Date:
Contents
Abstract 3
Introduction 3
Defining Issues and Problems of the Tamarack Case 4
Organizational behavior theories 7
Recommendation 9
Conclusion 11
References 12
Executive Summary
Conflict is a process in which one party claims that its welfare is opposed as well asopposed affected by other party. Likewise, conflict can eventually be depends on the perception that can occurs when one person claims that other person hinders her/his efforts to do work. Conflict can be relationship or constructive. Constructive conflict is when people maintain respect for others while focusing their discussions on issues. Such as, in Tamarack (Tamarack) industry worker conflict case, elder members of staff moreover workers of Greek team have different views on what to do. This is an instance of a constructive conflict. Relationship conflict is where people pay attention to the individuality of other people. Such as, in Tamarack employee conflict case, elder employees despise the university team workersas they are arrogant and slow. Nevertheless, using the conflict process model can resolve conflicts well in someassociation. The model contains a variety of different alternatives that can best resolve conflicts among Tamarack employees.
Introduction
Tamarack Industries is business engaged in the production of the motor boats, which are generally used for a water skiing. In summer, third line of production will be formed to meet the high demands of summer. However, this resulted in the distribution of employees to each three production lines, or the hiring of summer college students to help the crew complicate. Nevertheless, in the long-ago, experienced employees have complained about working with the college students, calling them arrogant and slow. This can led Dan Jensen, the head of the business, to execute aN innovative strategy in which the third row consisted only of university students. Mark Allen (Mark Allen) was sent to supervise Greek team moreover spent a lots of hours with them on their training ground, which improved productivity to standard and minimized errors(Donnell, Heyd and Michigan, 2014). Subsequently, Dan Jensen assigned aninnovative crew to make 40 identical units compared to the previous 30 identical units, because this also helped reduce errors. However, there was a conflict among the Greek team moreover the company's older employees (permanent workers). This caused the foreman Dan Jensen to change his planbecause that he could change the status quo and reorganize the work distribution among the two staff members, nevertheless Mark Allen not agreed with this idea. Therefore, this leads to conflicts that need to be resolved in Tamarack business. OB is the application of information about the behavior of groups, individuals, as well as people in an organization. It uses a system approach. In other words, it defines the relationship among the associations and people from the viewpoint of the entire person, the whole group, the entire association, as well as the complete system. The goal is to make good relationships by attaining social goals, human goals, or organizational goals.
Defining Issues and Problems of the Tamarack Case
The major problem in the Tamarack Company is the conflict among the two teams, the conflict between the Greek group and the older employee team. It’s said that at the starting of work, the elderemployeeas well as Greek group had unique ideas about how companies must do things.
Leadership issue: Trust is important for teamwork, and trust begins when individuals understand each other. Also, Team members should definitely get to know each other professionally or personally. Disagreements can be healthy, also if done right, they can be led to useful arguments. It can lead individuals to different opinions, expand the knowledge as well as understanding; Different thoughts are not the bad thing. Without transparency, trust will be gained both within the project team also with the final client. It starts from the top: the bigger, the greater your responsibility to be an example. Employees track the leader’s actions, good or bad. If it works properly, it will have a constructive impact on the whole organization.
Cultural Diversity issues: Recruitment companies struggle with a variety of issues every day. Although some people think that diversity in the workplace is as simple as keeping quotas for race and gender of employees, this is more than that. Although local experience is an invaluable asset, it is also significant to promote teamwork to prevent collaborators from the different nations and limit knowledge transfer.
This problem can be overcome, particularly when there are potential conflicts among cultures, which makes them less eager to work together. Although, Negative cultural typecasts can seriously damage the company spirit as well as affect productivity. For instance, sometimes hundreds of years before the violence between Britain and France and Poland and Germany, he went into hiding at work. Colleagues from different cultural backgrounds can also instill different attitudes, values, behaviors, and ethics in the workplace. Although they can be rich and even useful in a variety of professional environments, they can also cause misunderstandings or inconveniences among group members.
The early resignation of Greek workers and their attacks on old workers with derogatory remarks caused another problem between them. In other words, the old workers sneaked into the work line of the Greek team during their breaks, concealed tools, creasing materials, installed crooked things, and did things that might...