Assessment 1: Seclusion debate. Assessment type Discussion Board Word limit / length 500 words Weighting 10% Due date Sunday 6th September at 11 pm AEST Week 1 Overview The use of seclusion is...

1 answer below »
Assessment 1: Seclusion debate. Assessment type Discussion Board Word limit / length 500 words Weighting 10% Due date Sunday 6th September at 11 pm AEST Week 1 Overview The use of seclusion is essential in the acute mental health setting: Yes or No? This assessment provides you with the opportunity to explore the arguments for OR against seclusion and to develop, with the use of relevant literature, an argument that supports the stance you have taken - for or against the use of seclusion in the acute mental health setting. Learning outcomes This assessment task is aligned to the following learning outcomes: 1. Critique the Mental Health Act and the ethics of acute care within the contexts of clinical intervention and consumer experiences of care 2. Appraise a range of acute care conditions engagement and interventions Assessment details Participate in the following discussion board by performing the following steps: 1. Undertake some research on the use of seclusion in the acute mental health setting. Choose a stance for or against the use of seclusion and justify your choice. 2. Identify the legal and ethical concerns associated with your stance and discuss how you would address these concerns. Submission format Please upload your research and synopsis as a Word document via Turnitin in Blackboard. After the due date please share on the discussion board in blackboard labelled “Share your position on seclusion”. 8 | P a g e Assessment 1 rubric (total marks = 10) Criterion Marks HD DI CR PA Fail Presents a synopsis of the use of seclusion. Choose a stance for or against the use of seclusion and justify your choice utilising available evidence. 4 Synopsis is extremely well written. Choice of stance is clearly established and justified. Available evidence extremely relevant. Synopsis is very well written. Choice of stance is clearly established and justified. Available evidence highly relevant. Synopsis is competently written. Choice of stance is justified. Available evidence relevant. Synopsis is adequate. Choice of stance is basically justified. Available evidence somewhat relevant. Synopsis is poorly described. Choice of stance is not justified. No evidence, or available evidence poorly linked. Critical comment about legal and ethical concerns, and how they might be addressed 4 Legal & ethical concerns identified extremely well. How legal and ethical concerns might be addressed is very evident. Legal & ethical concerns identified well. How legal and ethical concerns might be addressed is evident. Legal & ethical concerns identified competently. How legal and ethical concerns might be addressed is made clear. Legal & ethical concerns identified at a basic level. How legal and ethical concerns might be addressed is shown at an adequate level. Legal & ethical concerns not identified. How legal and ethical concerns might be addressed is unclear. Writing Spelling and grammar Referencing 2 Clear, crisp and coherent style. Very well organised. Free of grammar and spelling errors. All citations follow required style. Clear, coherent style. Well organised. Mostly free of grammatical and spelling errors. Citations follow required style. Small errors. Good style. Competently written. Structure is clear. A few grammatical errors. Most citations follow required style. Some errors. Writing is adequate. Structure could be clearer. Grammatical errors. Some citations follow required style. Errors. Poor style with little attention to spelling and punctuation. Poorly structured. Not written well. Citations do not follow required style.
Answered Same DaySep 08, 2021NRS83004Southern Cross University

Answer To: Assessment 1: Seclusion debate. Assessment type Discussion Board Word limit / length 500 words...

Parul answered on Sep 09 2021
136 Votes
No, I strongly disagree using seclusion as an essential method to cure mental health of patients. When we talk about mental health and well-being, I feel seclusion is not essential in the acute mental health setting. Although it is a known fact that seclusion is primarily used in health services especially in mental care scenario to cure problems. However, there were numerous amounts of ill-effects on patients as well as nurses due to this seclusion. For instance, in country like China, excessive clinical utilisation of seclusion was slowly accelerating that had resulted to onset of various ethical dilemma which had drawn public attention and concerns (Huf, G., Coutinho, E. S., Ferreira, M. A., Ferreira, S., Mello, F., & Adams, C. E., 2011). If we deep dive into the issue we will realise the fact that since the nursing staff was heavily occupied and due to limitation of workforce, there was adoption of seclusion as a coercive intervention handling behaviour of patients who were agitated and aggressive (Georgieva, I., Vesselinov, R., & Mulder, C. L., 2012). Therefore, dilemmas in healthcare especially about the way’s patients are taken care raises numerous health questions. In order to balance nurse's responsibilities to protect patients with their obligations to prevent from ay harm seclusion was considered as one of the most popular practice in psychiatric settings. As per the enactment of Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 is an effort to safeguard the rights of patients those are mentally ill and empower citizens to decide on the ways of treating mental illness rather than neglecting them in the name of care (Roberts, D., Crompton, D., Milligan, E., & Groves, A., 2009). Indeed, I find the entire...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here