Assessment 2 - Poster Presentation with NarrationStart AssignmentDue21 Marby10:00Points45Submittinga file uploadFile...













Assessment 2 - Poster Presentation with Narration

























  • Due








    21 Marby10:00














  • Points


    45








  • Submitting


    a file upload








  • File types


    pdf








  • Available


    until 24 Mar at 10:00























Assessment 2


-


Poster Presentation with Narration








Type:Poster presentation with narration







Weighting:





45


%











Method:Independent







Length:


Single powerpoint slide with five (5) minutes of narration (+/- 10%)








Submission type:


Powerpoint slide with recorded narration submitted electronically to Canvas and word document of narration and references.









Assessment description




For this assessment, you are tasked with creating a poster and providing a five (5) minute recorded narration around a chosen mental disorder and its connection to a chosen social stressor and/or ethical issue. In your presentation, you will explain the key concepts, research findings, and connections between the elements outlined below.







This assessment will provide evidence of your abilities against the following unit learning outcomes:








  • ULO 1. Describe the political, biopsychosocial, historical, and cultural factors that contribute to people's mental health, and explain how thesefactors influence people's experience of stigma, equity, and healthcare access in Australia;








  • ULO 2. Discuss therapeutic communication, use of self and working in partnership with cultural safety as critical concepts in mental health


    nursing care;








  • ULO 5. Evaluate contemporary models of mental health care for wellness across the lifespan; and








  • ULO 6. Identify and apply relevant ethical and legal frameworks for the safe nursing care of people experiencing challenges to their mental


    health.












Assessment instructions










  1. Choose one (1) mental health condition or disorder.(See examples from the list below).









  • Generalised anxiety disorder



  • Obsessive compulsive disorder



  • Major depressive disorder



  • Bipolar affective disorder



  • Schizophrenia



  • Schizoaffective disorder



  • First-episode psychosis



  • Post traumatic stress disorder



  • Borderline personality disorder



  • Anorexia nervosa



  • Bulimia nervosa









2. Choose a social and/or ethical issue.(See examples from the list below).







  • Poverty and financial hardship



  • Bullying and harassment



  • Employment and job insecurity



  • Climate change and natural disasters



  • Media portrayal of mental health



  • Social media use and its effects on mental health



  • Cultural pressures and expectations



  • Informed consent in psychological treatment or research



  • The ethics of involuntary treatment and hospitalization



  • The impact of mental health diagnoses on civil rights (e.g., forced treatment, exclusion from certain jobs)



  • Stigma and discrimination



  • Capacity and consent



  • Restrictive mental health care practices









3. Develop a five (5) minute presentation using a single Powerpoint slide (poster) with recorded narration.








Your presentation should address the following points:








  • Overview of the chosen mental disorder (e.g., onset, symptoms, course, and prevalence)



  • Critical discussion explores the social stressor and/or ethical issue chosen and its potential impact on the person experiencing the mental disorder, including,






    • emotional, psychological and social impacts, and



    • equity and access to healthcare













  • Recommend contemporary evidence based interventions/approaches to support the well being and recovery of a person experiencing the mental disorder and social stressor or ethical issue that you have described.



  • Appropriate ethical and legal considerations related to mental health care practice are evident in the presentation content



  • Your powerpoint poster should include relevant images, diagrams, and infographics to highlight key points (e.g., statistics, mental health graphs, flowcharts, or illustrations). These must be cited appropriately, please refer to theAI statement here for more information on referencing AI sourcesLinks to an external site.


















Submission guidelines




Please submit the following to Canvas by the due date:







  • Poster presentation (single powerpoint slide) with recorded narration



  • Transcript of your narration with your reference list (APA 7th formatting)






Note:







  • Students' names are not to be included on any assessment tasks/submissions. Only student ID numbers should be included (as per theAssessment PolicyandAssessment Procedures)



  • Please note that your submission will be reviewed by the University’s plagiarism-checking software and, with reasonable grounds, be subject to further inquiry through the Office of the Associate Dean of Education










Extensions and Late Submissions




Please refer to the Unit Outline and the University of Canberra and Assessment procedures forinformation regarding extensions, late submissions, and assessment requirements.




Late submission of assignments without an approved extension will result in a penalty of 10% of the maximum available marks for the assessment item per day, up to and including three (3) calendar days. After 3 days, a zero (0) mark will be awarded (per UC assessment policy).








Academic Integrity




Students must submit original work, that has not been previously submitted for assessment at the University of Canberra. Self-plagiarism is grounds for referral for academic misconduct.








Support resources




If you’re facing unanticipated extenuating circumstances that are affecting your ability to complete an assignment on time, you can apply for an extension.Your assignment extension request will be considered, and you’ll be notified of the outcome via your student email account.




If you are looking for more information about support and requirements for completing your assessments, review the


Studying at UC: Resources for Studentspage as this connects you with a wider range of information and services available to you as a UC student.




If you have a question about this assessment, please post it on theAssessment 2 - Q&A discussion.









Submission details




To submit, select the 'Start Assignment' button which will then allow you to upload the files you need to submit.



















Rubric













PowerPoint poster with narration


















































































































































PowerPoint poster with narration





CriteriaRatingsPts












This criterion is linked to a learning outcome





Provides a clear and detailed outline of the chosen mental disorder (e.g., onset, symptoms, course, and prevalence)






























































10Pts



High Distinction



(Range - 10-8.5 marks) Exceptional and comprehensive outline of the chosen mental disorder with excellent, accurate and relevant detail including onset, symptoms, course and prevalence addressed.
























8.49Pts



Distinction



(Range - 8.49 - 7.5 marks) Very good outline of the chosen mental disorder with relevant detail including onset, symptoms, course and prevalence addressed to a high standard.
























7.49Pts



Credit



(Range - 7.49 - 6.5 marks) Good outline of the chosen mental disorder with relevant detail including onset, symptoms, course and prevalence addressed, however there may be some omissions or inaccuracies.
























6.49Pts



Pass



(Range - 6.49 - 5 Marks) Satisfactory outline of the chosen mental disorder with mostly relevant detail including onset, symptoms, course and prevalence addressed, however there are omissions or inaccuracies
























4.99Pts



Unsatisfactory



(Range - 4.99 - 0 marks) Unsatisfactory or absent outline of the chosen mental disorder. Major omissions or inaccuracies to the relevant detail including onset, symptoms, course and prevalence of the chosen mental disorder.


















10pts


















This criterion is linked to a learning outcome





Provides critical discussion of the social stressor and/or ethical issue chosen and its potential impact on the person experiencing the mental disorder, including, emotional, psychological and social impacts, equity and access to healthcare






























































10Pts



High Distinction



(Range - 10-8.5 marks) Exceptional and considered critical discussion of the social stressor and/or ethical issue chosen and its potential impact on the person experiencing the mental disorder, including, emotional, psychological and social impacts, equity and access to healthcare.
























8.49Pts



Distinction



(Range - 8.49 - 7.5 marks) Very good critical discussion of the social stressor and/or ethical issue chosen and its potential impact on the person experiencing the mental disorder, including, emotional, psychological and social impacts, equity and access to healthcare.
























7.49Pts



Credit



(Range - 7.49 - 6.5 marks) Good critical discussion of the social stressor and/or ethical issue chosen and its potential impact on the person experiencing the mental disorder, including, emotional, psychological and social impacts, equity and access to healthcare. However there may be some omissions or inaccuracies.
























6.49Pts



Pass



(Range - 6.49 - 5 Marks) Satisfactory critical discussion of the social stressor and/or ethical issue chosen and its potential impact on the person experiencing the mental disorder, including, emotional, psychological and social impacts, equity and access to healthcare. However, there are omissions or inaccuracies.
























4.99Pts



Unsatisfactory



(Range - 4.99 - 0 marks) Unsatisfactory or absent discussion of the social stressor and/or ethical issue chosen and its potential impact on the person experiencing the mental disorder, including, emotional, psychological and social impacts, equity and access to healthcare. There are major omissions or inaccuracies.


















10pts


















This criterion is linked to a learning outcome





Critical discussion of contemporary evidence-based interventions / approaches to support the wellbeing and recovery of a person experiencing the mental disorder and social stressor and/or ethical issue described.






























































10Pts



High Distinction



(Range - 10-8.5 marks) Exceptional and considered critical discussion of the contemporary evidence-based interventions / approaches to support the wellbeing and recovery of a person experiencing the mental disorder and social stressor or ethical issue described.
























8.49Pts



Distinction



(Range - 8.49 - 7.5 marks) Very good critical discussion of the contemporary evidence-based interventions / approaches to support the wellbeing and recovery of a person experiencing the mental disorder and social stressor or ethical issue described.
























7.49Pts



Credit



(Range - 7.49 - 6.5 marks) Good critical discussion of the contemporary evidence-based interventions / approaches to support the wellbeing and recovery of a person experiencing the mental disorder and social stressor or ethical issue described, however there may be some omissions or inaccuracies.
























6.49Pts



Pass



(Range - 6.49 - 5 Marks) Satisfactory critical discussion of the contemporary evidence-based interventions / approaches to support the wellbeing and recovery of a person experiencing the mental disorder and social stressor or ethical issue described, however there are omissions or inaccuracies.
























4.99Pts



Unsatisfactory



(Range - 4.99 - 0 marks) Unsatisfactory or absent critical discussion of the contemporary evidence-based interventions / approaches to support the wellbeing and recovery of a person experiencing the mental disorder and social stressor or ethical issue described. There are major omissions or inaccuracies.


















10pts


















This criterion is linked to a learning outcome





Critical discussion of appropriate ethical and legal considerations related to mental health care practice applicable to the mental disorder and social stressor and/or ethical issue described.






























































5Pts



High Distinction



(Range – 5 - 4.25 marks) Exceptional and considered Critical discussion of appropriate ethical and legal considerations related to mental health care practice applicable to the mental disorder and social stressor and/or ethical issue described.
























4.24Pts



Distinction



(Range – 4.24 - 3.75 marks) Very good Critical discussion of appropriate ethical and legal considerations related to mental health care practice applicable to the mental disorder and social stressor and/or ethical issue described.
























3.74Pts



Credit



(Range – 3.74 - 3.25 marks) Good Critical discussion of appropriate ethical and legal considerations related to mental health care practice applicable to the mental disorder and social stressor and/or ethical issue described.
























3.24Pts



Pass



(Range – 3.24 - 2.5 marks) Satisfactory Critical discussion of appropriate ethical and legal considerations related to mental health care practice applicable to the mental disorder and social stressor and/or ethical issue described.
























2.49Pts



Unsatisfactory



(Range – 2.49– 0 marks) Unsatisfactory or absent Critical discussion of appropriate ethical and legal considerations related to mental health care practice applicable to the mental disorder and social stressor and/or ethical issue described.


















5pts


















This criterion is linked to a learning outcome





Formatting expectations of the presentation with use of a single PowerPoint slide as a poster and content is presented clearly, creatively and logically, with consideration given to graphic design including use of colour, fonts and imagery. Narration is clear, logical and is delivered in 5 minutes (+/- 10%) in a professional manner. Follows conventional academic approach including – academic language, grammar, spelling, punctuation and syntax in the written and narrated components.






























































5Pts



High Distinction



(Range – 5 - 4.25 marks) Presentation exceeds expectations. A high amount of effort and thought are evident. Presentation is logically developed and shows creativity. Writing skills including referencing, spelling and grammar are of a high standard. Presentation is the correct duration with a single PowerPoint slide (poster). Excellent standard of presentation and structure. Excellent clarity and articulation of ideas (with extensive use of professional terminology) that reflects the assessment instructions. Adheres to time limit (+/- 10%)
























4.24Pts



Distinction



(Range – 4.24 - 3.75 marks) Presentation is comprehensive and logically developed. A good show of creativity. Referencing is of a high standard. Presentation is the correct duration with a single PowerPoint slide (poster). Good standard of presentation and structure. Good clarity and articulation of ideas (with good use of professional terminology) that mostly reflects the assessment instructions. Adheres to time limit (+/- 10%)
























3.74Pts



Credit



(Range – 3.74 - 3.25 marks) Presentation is presented clearly and logically. References are cited. Minimal spelling or grammatical errors. Minor to no referencing errors. Presentation is the correct duration with a single PowerPoint slide (poster). Adequate standard of presentation and structure. Adequate clarity and articulation of ideas (with limited use of professional terminology) that somewhat reflects the assessment instructions. Adheres to time limit (+/- 10%)
























3.24Pts



Pass



(Range – 3.24 - 2.5 marks) Presentation is clear but is presented with minimal effort displayed. Adheres to the word limit. References present but missing details or multiple errors. Presentation is the correct duration with a single PowerPoint slide (poster). Structure and presentation do not provide adequate clarity, with poor articulation of ideas within the assessment, including minimal use of professional terminology. Presentation does not reflect the assessment instructions. Adheres to time limit (+/- 10%)
























2.49Pts



Unsatisfactory



(Range – 2.49– 0 marks)Presentation is disjointed. Does not adhere to the correct duration and number of slides. Articulation of ideas within the assessment does not reflect the assessment instructions. No demonstration of structure or clarity during assessment. No use of professional language throughout. Does not adhere to time limit (+/- 10%)


















5pts


















This criterion is linked to a learning outcome





Use of high quality sources to support the presentation. Referencing utilising APA 7th referencing style






























































5Pts



High Distinction



(Range – 5 - 4.25 marks) Student supports the presentation with a high number of high-quality references. Sources are highly appropriate, contemporary and from a range of journals and databases. Complies with all APA 7th referencing style requirements in the transcript. There are no errors in referencing.
























4.24Pts



Distinction



(Range – 4.24 - 3.75 marks) Student supports the presentation with a good number of good-quality references. Sources are appropriate, contemporary and from a range of journals and databases. Complies with all APA 7th referencing style requirements in the transcript. Less than 5 minor referencing errors.
























3.74Pts



Credit



(Range – 3.74 - 3.25 marks) Student supports the presentation with a good number of references. Sources are mostly appropriate, evidence-based and contemporary. Mostly Complies with APA 7th referencing style requirements in the transcript. Some referencing errors (5-7).
























3.24Pts



Pass



(Range – 3.24 - 2.5 marks) Student supports the presentation with a satisfactory number of references. Sources are mostly appropriate, However, there are too few to demonstrate wide reading. Attempts to use APA 7th referencing style in the transcript. Some referencing errors (8-10).
























2.49Pts



Unsatisfactory



(Range – 2.49 – 0 marks) Student supports the presentation with an unsatisfactory number of references. Sources are inappropriate and/or absent. In-text referencing and/or reference list contains major errors (>10).


















5pts









Total points:45














Mar 09, 2025
SOLUTION.PDF

Get Answer To This Question

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here