Assessment 3: Critical analysis Weighting: 50% Word count 2500 words) +/- 10% The assessment for this unit is based on students undertaking a critical analysis of the role of the Nurse Practitioner...

1 answer below »


Assessment 3: Critical analysis



Weighting: 50%



Word count 2500 words) +/- 10%


The assessment for this unit is based on students undertaking a critical analysis of the role of the Nurse Practitioner (NP)ORClinical Nurse Specialist (CNS). Students are required to discuss the application of the role they have chosen to their workplace. This assignment will provide students with the opportunity to explore and gain further theoretical understanding of the chosen role. Students are required to discuss the registration standards in Australia and the practice domains.


In order to complete this paper, the students are required to review 7-8 referred journal articles in relation to the roles of Nurse PractitionerORClinical Nurse Specialist and they are also required to locate and utilize the websites for the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia and the Australian Health Care Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) site.



Assessed: Marking criteria/rubric


Rubric

Assessment 4 (Assignment 3)Assessment 4 (Assignment 3)





































CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction










5.0to >4.0ptsHDEvidence of exceptional understanding and clear and adequate description of the selected role.4.0to >3.0ptsDEvidence of relevant knowledge and understanding of the selected role.3.0to >2.5ptsCAdequately identifies and describes the selected role.2.5to >2.0ptsPProvides minimal description and understanding of the selected role.2.0to >0ptsNFails to provide an adequate description and understanding of the selected role.

5.0pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent and literature










15.0to >14.0ptsHDPurpose of the writing is very clear and ideas flow in a logical sequence. The student provides 10 to 15 relevant academic references in the paper. A minimum of 5-7 peer reviewed journal articles are included.14.0to >11.0ptsDPurpose of the writing is clear. The student provides 10 to 15 relevant academic references in the paper. A minimum of 5-7 peer reviewed journal articles are included.11.0to >8.0ptsCis provided. The student utilizes 10 to 15 relevant academic references in the paper. A minimum of 5-7 peer reviewed journal articles are included.8.0to >7.5ptsPPurpose of the writing is provided. The student utilizes 10 to 15 relevant academic references in the paper. A minimum of 5-7 peer reviewed journal articles are included.7.5to >0ptsNPurpose is not clear. Student provides less than 10 references. Uses many text and internet sources. Does not use peer reviewed and/or evidence- based practice source(s).

15.0pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritically evaluates and appraises the role










20.0to >18.0ptsHDA comprehensive critical analysis of the chosen role is provided. Consistently interprets the information gathered in an accurate and highly insightful way and provides highly creative and unique syntheses of that information. Demonstrates exceptional understanding of the important concepts of the nursing role. Demonstrates an excellent ability to incorporate and integrate relevant research throughout the paper.18.0to >15.0ptsDA very good critical analysis of the chosen role is provided. Consistently interprets the information gathered for an accurate synthesis of the information concisely. Displays a very good understanding of the important concepts of the nursing role. Demonstrates a strong ability to incorporate and integrate the research throughout the paper.15.0to >11.0ptsCA good critical analysis of the chosen role is provided. Sporadically interprets the information gathered for a limited synthesis of its application. Displays a good understanding of the important concepts and generalizations. Incorporates research sporadically throughout the discussion paper.11.0to >7.0ptsPA brief critical analysis of the chosen role is provided. Rarely interprets information accurate information and very poor synthesis of application of policy. Displays an incomplete understanding of the important concepts and generalization and has some notable misconceptions. Only provides minimal amount of research to support the discussion throughout paper.7.0to >0ptsNAn inadequate analysis of the chosen role and minimal support provided. Fails to interpret information gathered for the synthesis of the application of policy. Demonstrates severe misconceptions about the concepts and generalizations. Fails to incorporate or integrate research to support the discussion throughout paper.

20.0pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation










5.0to >4.0ptsHDObjectives are very clearly provided. Logical and sequential arrangement of arguments and discussions. Sentence structure and grammar excellent. Headings are very accurately labelled, and the information presented under the heading is consistent with the heading. Conclusion provides a very clear summary of the presentation. No new information is provided.4.0to >3.0ptsDObjectives are clearly provided. Good flow of ideas. Mostly logical and sequential arrangement of arguments and discussions. Headings are clearly labelled, and the information presented under the heading is relevant to the heading. Conclusion provides a clear summary of the presentation. No new information is provided.3.0to >2.5ptsCObjectives are provided in the presentation but not consistently clear. Minor issues with flow of ideas. Logical and sequential arrangement of arguments and discussions. Not all headings are clearly provided and the information under each heading is not always relevant to the heading. Conclusion provides an adequate summary of the presentation. No new information is provided.2.5to >2.0ptsPObjectives are only briefly mentioned in the presentation. Lack of clarity with ideas and inconsistent structure with the arrangement of arguments and discussions. Headings are only provided sometimes and/or the information under the heading not always relevant to the heading. Conclusion provides a poor summary of the presentation. No new information is provided.2.0to >0ptsNObjectives are not mentioned in the presentation. Incoherent structure. Ideas do not flow in a logical or sequential manner. Poor planning of the paper. Headings are not labelled consistently and/or unclear. The information provided is inconsistent with the topic heading. Inconsistent referencing or missing referencing. Conclusion is not provided.

5.0pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format and References










5.0to >4.0ptsHDPaper contains 1-2 errors in grammar, punctuation or spelling. Paper meets APA guidelines regarding margins, font, references etc. All content follows current APA writing guidelines4.0to >3.0ptsDPaper contains less than 3 errors in grammar, punctuation or spelling. Paper meets appropriate APA guidelines regarding margins, font, references, etc. Most content compliant with current APA writing guidelines3.0to >2.5ptsCPaper contains less than 3 errors in grammar, punctuation or spelling. Paper uses minimal APA guidelines regarding appropriate margins, font, references, etc. Minimal compliance with current APA writing guidelines2.5to >2.0ptsPPaper contains 5 or more grammatical, punctuation or spelling errors. Paper attempts to use some APA guidelines for appropriate margins, font, references, etc. Most of content is not in compliance with current APA writing guidelines.2.0to >0ptsNPaper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation or spelling errors. Paper does not use appropriate margins, font, references, etc. The content is not compliant with current APA writing guidelines

5.0pts

Total Points:50.0
Answered Same DayJun 12, 2021

Answer To: Assessment 3: Critical analysis Weighting: 50% Word count 2500 words) +/- 10% The assessment for...

Tanaya answered on Jun 19 2021
144 Votes
Running Head: ASSESSMENT 3: CRITICAL ANALYSIS
        1
ASSESSMENT 3: CRITICAL ANALYSIS        11
ASSESSMENT 3: CRITICAL ANALYSIS
[Critical Analysis of the Role of the Nurse Practitioner (NP)]
Table of Contents
Introduction    3
Critical Analysis    3
Conclusion    10
References    11
Introduction
The nurse practitioners help in providing health services, which are at times more than a registered nurse. They help in the diagnosis of the health condition and also treat them. Further they are capable of interpretation of the radiological and bl
ood tests and are authorised to prescribe medications. In Australia, the nurse practitioners have high skill level and play an integral; part of the health care system. They are capable of functioning autonomously contributing values in the health services. It is observed that in Australia, nurse practitioners are considered to be one of the highest levels in the nursing hierarchy.
Although, nurses in the remote areas are trained to be able to take the role of the nurse practitioners; however, in most of the cases, a practiced nurse needs to work their way to be in the position of the nurse practitioners. Thus, it can be understood that t these group of nurses make important decision related to the healthcare services. In the study, seven articles have been selected that identifies and explains the roles of the nurse practitioners based on the standards set by the Nursing and Midwifery board in Australia as well as the regulatory agency of health care practitioner in Australia.
Critical Analysis
Nursing had developed and proliferated in the last 30 years with the increase in registration level and also with the strengthening of the standards of Practice. The main purpose of these Standards is it helps in providing a framework that helps in describing a professional practice at a specific level. The Australian Critical Care Nurse guideline (ACCCN) have been developed from the Standards of the Nursing Care for the Critically ill patients. As stated by Gill, Kendrick, Davies and Greenwood (2017), an observational procedure has been developed by the ACCCN competency standards in the process of the critical nursing care of the patients.
In the study, carried out by Gill et al. (2017), the competency standards are been revised that are followed by the nurse practitioners so that the needs of the critical care are met by the nurses. This was carried out following a Delphi method. In addition, the researcher carried out verification of the practice standards and performance standards whose criteria was built on Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australian National Competencies.
In support to Gill et al. (2017), Gullick et al. (2018), carried out review as well as synthesis of the contemporary structures in the critical care education of the nurses and their outcome. By performing Donabedian’s framework, Gullick et al. (2018), analysed the practice and the education of the nurse practitioner in providing the best possible care to the patients. While educating the nurse practitioners on the standards and policies for the workforce, there were certain processes that were included as a part of the education of the nurses to increase their efficiency.
This included patient acuity, competencies in terms of assessors and preceptors. These were carried out through an evidence-based measurement of the clinical abilities and competencies of the nurses. As it has been accepted by the Australian healthcare standards that the critical care can be complex as well as multifaceted. Hence, best practices and processes needs to be implemented for the training of the nurse practitioners so that their skills m and knowledge meets the need and safety of the society. This can be achieved with the development of the CNN expertise among the nurse practitioners.
In addition, the policies and standards including the governing bodies can help in enhancing the quality of the care and reducing the variance in the care provided by the nurses. As mentioned by Cashin et al. (2017), the Australian Standards for practice for the nurse practitioners, which were reviewed in the year 2006 highlighted the importance of the national competencies for registered nurses. As stated by the NMBA, the nursing standards that has been established by the legislatures are dynamic, professional, economic and educational. Especially as emphasised by the NMBA legislature that the nurse practitioners need to monitor that they have the competencies, which have the ability to migrate the nursing workforce and health globally.
As mentioned by Cashin et al. (2017), the competency models of the nurses are attributed by the different approaches, which are activity based focusing on the apt performance of their functions. The researchers have carried out a review of 40 different standard protocols followed by the Nurse practitioners to ensure that the nurses have the ability and the competencies in providing best results and care through their practices. There had been an increased advanced nursing practice. As observed by Parker and Hill (2017), the federal government has made several decisions so that the nursing education can be shifted to a hospital-based program.
In Australia, the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law have impacted on responsibilities handled by the health...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here