Assessment 3 Written Assessment (15%) Due Date: Week 8 Word Count: XXXXXXXXXXwords The goal of this assessment is to assess students’ knowledge and comprehension of conflict resolution in community...

ASSESSMENT 3 WRITTEN ASSESSMENT                        1
ASSESSMENT 3 WRITTEN ASSESSMENT                         7
ASSESSMENT 3 WRITTEN ASSESSMENT
THOMAS-KILMANN CONFLICT MODE INSTRUMENT (TKMI)
Table of Contents
Introduction    3
Top 2 Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode:    3
Competing:    3
Avoiding:    3
Agreeing with the Results    4
Example of Competing Mode:    4
Example of Avoiding Mode:    4
Disagreeing with Examples    5
Example of Competing Mode:    5
Example of Avoiding Mode:    5
Other Conflicting Mode:    5
Conclusion    6
References    7
Introduction
In every individual’s life, a conflict situation always transpires, which are sometimes uncontrollable and unpredictable. They sometimes yearn to get rid out of these conflict situations or sometimes they create certain conflict situations for others in order to put them in trouble. Thomas- Kilmann conflict mode instruction has been designed in order to measure the individual’s behaviour in certain conflict situations.
When two individuals concern and opinion appears to be incompatible there this conflict situations arises. Two-dimensional behaviour is observed in such conflict situations and they are assertiveness and cooperativeness, which thereby comprises of different responding modes such as competing, collaborating, compromising, avoiding and accommodating.
Top 2 Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode:
Competing:
This is a Thomas-Kilmann conflict mode, which is non-cooperative as well as assertive in sense. Competitions are always welcome in every organisation as it encourages and energies the employees to struggle and fulfil their desire and determined goal but this competitive nature should not take an over power-oriented mentality, from which thereby results in a conflict situation. ‘Competing’ means simply trying, to win anyhow by any means, without bothering about others. As stated by Harms (2017), this is a power- oriented mode where an individual is found to use their power anyhow in order to win, hold their position, their capacity to argue, their ranks and economic sanctions.
Avoiding:
This is a Thomas-Kilmann conflict mode, which are both non-cooperative as well as un assertive in sense. Here individuals neither shows their own concern towards others nor they pursue some one’s other concerns and by doing so they just avoid the conflict situations. By avoiding any problematic situation, the individual is actually sidestepping diplomatically from the conflict situation (Qadir, 2020). They are found to just postponed the conflicts situations and wait for the favourable situations, they simply avoid getting involved in any serious situations or simply they avoid expressing their own concern towards other in order to ignore the conflict situations.
Agreeing with the Results
Yes, I agree with above-mentioned...