ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Title PUBH6008: Capstone A: Applied Research Project in Public Health Assessment 2: Literature review Individual 4,000 words Assessment Individual/Group Length...

1 answer below »

ASSESSMENT BRIEF

Subject Code and Title

PUBH6008: Capstone A: Applied Research Project in Public Health

Assessment 2: Literature review Individual
4,000 words

Assessment

Individual/Group

Length

Learning Outcomes

This assessment addresses the following learning outcomes:

  1. Integrate and apply their knowledge and skills in public health

  2. Develop research skills and apply these to a public health issue

  3. Conduct a small literature review which critically analyses key issues on a public health research topic

  4. Define and justify a research question, based on the

    literature/public health issue, and outline its significance

Submission

Due Sunday following the end of Module 4 at 11:55pm AEST/AEDT*

40%
100 marks

*Please Note: This time isSydneytime (AEST or AEDT). Please convert to your own time zone (eg. Adelaide = 11:25pm).

Weighting

Total Marks

PUBH6008_Assessment Brief 2 Page1of6Instructions:

By theend of module 3, student must provide to their learning facilitator a brief review of the literature on their chosen topic. The literature review must contain key references/theorists/researchers for the public health topic chosen. The literature review assignment must be designed to address the following questions:

  • Who are the key theorists/researchers in your public health topic?

  • What are the key issues?

  • What are the gaps in the existing body of knowledge?

    The literature review should provide a basis for justifying a clear research question or hypothesis to be explored further.

    You must also indicate the search strategy used for your literature review. For example, what were the key words you searched for, and which key databases or other sources did you use to conduct your literature review? (e.g. CINAHL, Proquest Public Health, Informit, Medline, Google Scholar).

    Assessment Criteria:

•Critical and comprehensive review of the literature (70%)Clarity of research question/hypothesis (10%)General assessment criteria (20%):

oProvides a lucid introduction
oShows a sophisticated understanding of the key issues
oShows ability to interpret relevant information and literature in relation to

chosen topic
oDemonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant conceptsoShows

evidence of reading beyond the required readings
oJustifies any conclusions reached with well-formed arguments and not merely

assertions
oProvides a conclusion or summaryoCorrectly uses academic writing,

presentation and grammar:

  • ▪ Complies with academic standards of legibility, referencing and

    bibliographical details (including reference list)

  • ▪ Writes clearly, with accurate spelling and grammar as well as proper

    sentence and paragraph construction

  • ▪ Uses appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research

PUBH6008_Assessment Brief 2 Page2of6

Answered 1 days AfterApr 08, 2022

Solution

Bidusha answered on Apr 10 2022
13 Votes
Impact Of Covid-19 Pandemic on The Mental Health of Australians        14
IMPACT OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON THE MENTAL HEALTH OF AUSTRALIANS
Table of contents
Chapter 2: Literature Review    3
Introduction    3
Methods    5
Literature Review    8
Conclusion    17
References    18
Chapter 2: Literature Review
Introduction
The new Covid SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic is unmatched in late history,
inging about high paces of mortality and sickness, as well as loss of pay and social confinement for billions of individuals all through the world. It unsure effect this emergency will have on populace psychological well-being in the short and long run. The intense emotional well-being impacts of enormous scope pandemics across networks are ineffectively perceived. Existing exploration has generally centred on those individuals who are generally straightforwardly affected by ailment (e.g., infected individuals and their families, medical services staff) and has just taken a gander at psychological well-being impacts in bigger gatherings after the intense stage has gone. Anxiety toward disease, employment misfortune, and monetary strain are largely prone to
ing mental pain up in everybody during the intense period. People who have previously been presented to ho
ible encounters might persevere significantly more pain. Melancholy and injury are probably going to create over the long haul, and in the event that monetary and social outcomes become laid out, the gamble of so
ow and suicidality might rise.
Past reports on the psychological well-being impacts of disastrous wellbeing plagues have for the most part centred on ailment survivors. Frequently, these examinations uncover that survivors report more mental trouble after an episode than others in a similar local area. Individuals who work in jobs that could open them to disease, as well as the people who have companions or relatives who have been tainted, might be at a higher gamble of mental distress. Notwithstanding, there are convincing grounds to trust that, during the intense period of COVID-19, government strategies and actual obstructions focused on at forestalling infection transmission will affect psychological wellness in the bigger populace. Employment cutback, monetary trouble, and social segregation, for instance, are largely very much reported marks of psychological wellness issues. Actual division measures have proactively
ought about a monstrous expansion in joblessness in a few countries, placing many individuals in genuine monetary waterways.
As the plague and its drawn-out repercussions continue, assembling early information of COVID-19's belongings is basic for further developing psychological well-being care conveyance. During the intense time of the pandemic in Australia, the present review analysed a delegate test of Australians from March 28 to March 31, 2020. Before the finish of the review, 19 passings had been reported in Australia, contrasted with right around 36,500 passings around the world. The Australian government had covered cafés, clubs, and holy places in the week going before up to the survey, seriously restricted the size of public and private gatherings, kept unfamiliar individuals from entering Australia, and forced cruel quarantine strategies for Australians getting back from a
oad.
The objective of this study was to catch the primary psychological well-being circumstance in the Australian populace and examine its relationship with wide COVID-19 openness during this vital intense period.
· To describe the varied effects of the Covid-19 epidemic on the mental health of the Australian populace.
· To investigate the disparities in the effects of the Covid-19 epidemic on mental health throughout the Australian population's various age groups.
· To discover possible solutions or treatments that may be useful in reducing the impact of Covid-19 on the mental health of Australians.
We likewise considered in the staggering bushfires that attacked Australia from November 2019 to January 2020. We anticipated that more elevated levels of COVID-19 openness, as well as hindrances in work, funds, and social working, would be connected to expanded mental inconvenience and lower mental prosperity.
Methods
The impact of huge scale epidemics on local area mental health, especially during the intense period, is minimal understood. Because of this data vacuum, we are tragically ill-equipped to assist communities with adapting to the phenomenal COVID-19 flare-up. The objective of this study was to create information that would be basic in illuminating government strategy and resource allotment in the cu
ent and future crises (Newby et al., 2020). The research was the first to survey a representative sample of the Australian populace during the COVID-19 pandemic's beginning phases. Very much approved questionnaires were used to assess depression, anxiety, and psychological prosperity.
As the epidemic and its drawn out repercussions persist, assembling early information of COVID-19's effects is basic for further developing mental health care conveyance. During the intense time of the pandemic in Australia, this study analyzed a representative sample of Australians from March 28 to March 31, 2020. Before the finish of the study, 19 deaths had been archived in Australia, contrasted with almost 36,500 deaths around the world. The Australian government had shuttered restaurants, clubs, and churches in the week paving the way to the survey, severely restricted the size of public and private meetings, kept unfamiliar individuals from entering Australia, and imposed harsh quarantine procedures on Australians getting back from overseas. To assess the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on a representative sample of the Australian grown-up populace (18 years), we sent off another longitudinal research, The Australian National COVID-19 Mental Health, Behaviour, and Risk Communication Survey. Participants must have the option to finish an internet based English language survey to take part (Rossell et al., 2021). The study consists of seven survey waves that are directed internet based at regular intervals by Research Services. Standard sampling was used to deliver a representative sample based on age, orientation, and geographic region. Subsequent to getting a definite outline of the study, participants signed a composed informed consent structure.
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) were used to measure depression and anxiety symptoms during the previous two weeks. These measurements are very similar to the diagnostic rules for significant depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. The World Health Organization Wellbeing Index was used to assess general psychological prosperity during the previous two weeks. COVID-19 exposure was determined as the sum of self-reports of possible or real virus exposures, related populace health responses, or close social effect, such as: having been diagnosed with the virus, anticipating test results, testing negative to the test, being in direct contact with a virus transporter, having needed to isolate in the past, choosing to isolate in the past, being compelled to isolate in the past, being compelled to isolate in the present, being compelled to isolate in the present, being compelled to isolate in the present, being.
The Work and Social Adjustment Scale was used to assess whether someone had lost their employment or was working from home as a result of COVID-19 (yes/no); was encountering monetary distress as a result of COVID-19 ; and the general degree to which their work and social activities were hurt by COVID-19 (WSAS). Participants in the WSAS passed judgment fair and square of weakness caused by COVID-19 out of five word related and social areas (capacity to work, home administration, social leisure activities, private leisure activities, and capacity to frame and keep up with close relationships). Age (in years); orientation (male/female/other); years of schooling; accomplice status (yes/no); living alone (yes/no); living with subordinate kids (yes/no); existing health, neurological, or psychological conditions, diagnosed by a suitable clinician (yes/no); ongoing exposure to bushfire smoke (yes/no); and effect of other late adverse life events (five-point Liker-type rating, from Not by any means to Extremely). The reason for distinguishing smoke from fire in the bushfire exposure variables is because numerous Australians who were exposed to smoke resided far away from the real flames and their home/district was never in impending peril. Unfortunate air quality kept individuals from spending time outside for quite some time over the summer for those who were impacted by smoke yet not by fire.
We discovered that the social, word related, and monetary disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic's intense phase were connected to significant deficits in local area mental health in Australian adults (Fisher et al., 2020). COVID-19 exposure, then again, was not viewed as an indicator of mental health in this partner. The assessment of a representative local area sample from the get-go in the pandemic, giving prompt proof of populace mental health status, was a critical strength of this study. The findings show that in the beginning phases of an illness, epidemics can produce substantial issues for local area mental health. To be sure, our findings show that, at a local area level, changes in social and work working as a result of COVID-19 were more significantly connected to mental health declines than the quantity of illness contacts. This conclusion is in accordance with a previous study in the United Kingdom, which observed that residents are more anxious about what societal changes would mean for their psychological and monetary prosperity than they are tied in with being sick from the virus. This discovery is also in accordance with ongoing research that suggests loneliness is a main consideration in the COVID-19 pandemic's mental health effects. Generally, the essential general health measures around the plague are plainly having substantial consequences for local area mental health, since they debilitate social and professional working.
This is not to say that the mental health costs of pandemic-related societal upheavals will always be...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here