Assessment DescriptionThe purpose of this Case Study assignment is to walk through the logical framework (LogFrame) and to create the project management documents needed to successfully lead a...

Assessment Description





Stakeholder Template Example Stakeholder Analysis Project Name: New System Number NineProject Manager: Jane LopeJustification for Responses BasicsProject InformationCommitment LevelJustification C - Current Level R - Required Level StakeholderTitleEmailInfluencePrioritySME?Decision-MakerAgainstPassiveNeutral HelpInfluencePriorityCommitment LevelWhy Included? Don LuEngineerdonlu@emailHighHighYesYesCRAs the Sr. Engineer Don has considerable influence over the design and timing of this effortAs both an SME and a decision-maker, Don must have project information in almost real time.Without Don, this project will fail.Don's help is critical to the design of the project. Ed HarrisFinanceed@emailMediumMediumYesNoCREd has some influence over the acceptance of the project budget and timing of the budget allocations.Ed needs to be kept informed of the project spend; however, his reports can be at month end.The team needs Ed to be neutral as an 'against' stance could prevent the budget from being approved or approved in a timely mannerEd has the ability to articulate the project needs in financial terms clearly. Jo AnnDesignjo@emailLowLowNoNoCR mailto:donlu@emailmailto:ed@emailmailto:jo@email Communications Template Stakeholder NameRoleInformationTimeframeMediaResponsible for UpdatesResponsible for Delivery Communications example Stakeholder NameRoleInformationTimeframeMediaResponsible for UpdatesResponsible for Delivery Carol AndersonProject SponsorSummary project status1st each monthe-mailTeamJames White (PM) Critical risks and issuesWeeklyDashboardJames White (PM)James White (PM) Budget & timeline performance1st each monthDashboardJames White (PM)James White (PM) James WhiteProject ManagerDetailed project statusWeeklyTeam status systemTeanTeam status system All risks and issuesWeeklyTeam status systemTeamTeam status system Resource, supplier, procurement budget & timeline performancee/o weeke-mailTeamFinance Matrix Sam DeanSafety AuditorLevel of safety compliance of all deliverables produced1st each month1st each monthQuality ManagerQuality Manager Stakeholder Template Stakeholder Analysis Project Name: {Your Project Name}Project Manager: {Proj. Mgr. Name}Justification for Responses BasicsProject InformationCommitment LevelJustification C - Current Level R - Required Level StakeholderTitleEmailInfluencePrioritySME?Decision-MakerAgainstPassiveNeutral HelpInfluencePriorityCommitment LevelWhy Included? Kitchen Heaven Project Case Study (Part 3) - Rubric Communication Plan 42.75 points Criteria Description Depth and breadth of the assignment, number and type of sources required, types of media, etc. (To be assigned) 5. Excellent 42.75 points The minimum number of stakeholders including the required components of the template were thorough. 4. Good 36.34 points The minimum number of stakeholders including the required components of the template were detailed. 3. Satisfactory 32.06 points The minimum number of stakeholders including the required components of the template were included. 2. Less Than Satisfactory 27.79 points The minimum number of stakeholders including the required components of the template were incomplete or incorrect. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points The minimum number of stakeholders were not included. Stakeholder Analysis 42.75 points Criteria Description Include number of cards, graphics, animations, etc. (To be assigned) 5. Excellent 42.75 points The minimum number of stakeholders including the required components of the template were thorough. 4. Good 36.34 points Collapse All The minimum number of stakeholders including the required components of the template were detailed. 3. Satisfactory 32.06 points The minimum number of stakeholders including the required components of the template were included. 2. Less Than Satisfactory 27.79 points The minimum number of stakeholders including the required components of the template were incomplete or incorrect. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points The minimum number of stakeholders were not included. Mechanics of Writing 9.5 points Criteria Description Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc. 5. Excellent 9.5 points No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout. 4. Good 8.08 points Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used. 3. Satisfactory 7.13 points Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted. 2. Less Than Satisfactory 6.18 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout. Total 95 points