Assessment item 2 - Written ReportValue: 30%Due Date: 14-May-2021Return Date: 07-Jun-2021Length: 2,000 wordsGroup Assessment: NoSubmission method options: Alternative submission methodTASKA selection of case studies will be provided to students in week 4, based on current events in the news. They will be related to topics covered over the first 6 weeks of class. You will need to analse the case study using the following structure.You are to develop a report using the following headings:1. Executive summary2. Table of contents3. Introduction4. Overview of case study – provide an overview of the case study you will focus on forthe report.5. Ethical issue – identify the ethical issue you wish to discuss, and outline why this posesan ethical issue.6. Concept: The broad and narrow view of CSR or distributive justice (PIMES)Define the concept and ethical arguments (Either the broad/narrow view of CSR or distributive justice (PIMES)Identify ethical connections to your selected case study7. Outline of ethical theory: Ethics of care or Kant8. Application of selected ethical theory, following the format covered in class9. Conclusion10. References – referencing should conform to APA 7 referencing guidelinesStudents may seek support and guidance on report writing from the academic skills team at:https://www.csu.edu.au/current-students/learning-resources/build-your-skills/academic-skills-help/academic-writing-essaysRATIONALESUBJECT LEARNING OUTCOMESThis assessment task will assess the following learning outcome/s:• be able to outline ethical theories in western moral philosophy and apply them in inter and intra cultural organisational contexts.• be able to describe the issues and critique the debates associated with the concept of corporate social responsibility in a global business environment. GRADUATE LEARNING OUTCOMESThis task also contributes to the assessment of the following CSU Graduate LearningCharles Sturt University Subject Outline MGT211 202130 SM IVersion 2 - Published 26 February 2021Page 14 of 27 Outcome/s (https://student.csu.edu.au/study/glo):• Ethics (Application) - Charles Sturt Graduates form judgements and apply ethicaldecision making and reasoning to identify creative solutions to ethical problems. Charles Sturt University Subject OutlineMGT211 202130 SM I Page 15 of 27 Version 2 - Published 26 February 2021
MARKING CRITERIA AND STANDARDS HD (25.5-30)DI (22.5-25.4)CR (19.5-22.4)PS (15-19.4)FL (0-14.9)Criterion 1Writing and presentation (20 marks)All presentation guidelines have been followed. Referencing is completed using APA 7th (ed) mostly without flaw. Elegant and engaging writing.All presentation guidelines have been followed. Referencing mostly complies with APA 7th (ed) style.Engaging writing with no errors.All presentation guidelines have been followed.A genuine attempt at referencing using APA 7thy (ed) is evident in- text and in the reference list but some minor errors.Writing is comprehensible with few errors.All presentation guidelines have been followed.A genuine attempt at APA 7th (ed) referencing is evident in-text and in the reference list. Writing is easy to follow but contains errors.Passing criterion has not been met.Criterion 2Responses to questions (40 marks)Clear andcomprehensiveunderstanding of the issues/concepts raised in the question. Explanations are eloquent and show clear evidence of deep critical reflection.Demonstrated a good understanding of the issues/concepts raised in the question.The student's explanations are clear and sufficient to allow the reader to follow the ethical dimensions in the task, and they show reasonable evidence of critical reflection.The student has demonstrated some understanding of the issues/concepts raised in the question. The student's explanations are sufficient to allow the reader to gain an understanding. There is some evidence of some reflection.A basic understanding of the issues/concepts raised in the question. The student's explanations may not be sufficient to allow the reader to gain a clear understanding. There is little evidence of serious reflection, but a reasonable attempt has been made to do so.Passing criterion has not been met. Charles Sturt University Subject OutlineMGT211 202130 SM I Page 16 of 27 Version 2 - Published 26 February 2021
HD (25.5-30)DI (22.5-25.4)CR (19.5-22.4)PS (15-19.4)FL (0-14.9)Criterion 3Application of theory (40 marks)The ethical theory has been applied extensively and accurately to support the student's position. The method/format shown in MGT230 has been used effectively so that the application of the theory was comprehensive. The student has provided relevant and coherent arguments and has used appropriate ethical principles to support them. Reasoning is based on facts rather than on unfoundedThe ethical theory has been applied well to support the student's position, and there are no inconsistencies. The method/format shown in MGT230 has been used clearly so that the application of the theory was comprehensive. The student has provided relevant and coherent arguments and has used appropriate ethical principles to support them. Reasoning is based on facts rather than on unfounded opinions. All arguments have been discussed, and opposing arguments have been rebutted convincingly. The student has provided a clear argument and has used theory effectively to support his/her positionThe ethical theory has been applied well to support the student's position, but there may be inconsistencies. The student has provided relevant and coherent arguments and has used appropriate ethical principles to support them. The method/ format shown in MGT230 has been generally followed so that the application of the theory was clear and supported. Reasoning is based on facts rather than on unfounded opinions. All arguments have been discussed, and opposing arguments have been rebutted. The student has provided a clear argument and has used theory effectively to support his/her position.An attempt has been made to apply the theory and the student has attempted to use use the method/format demonstrated in MGT230. The application may have some minor flaws. The student may have provided relevant and coherent arguments, but he/she may have failed to support them adequately. There may be some reliance on unfounded opinions or assumptions.Passing criterion has not been met. Charles Sturt University Subject OutlineMGT211 202130 SM I Page 17 of 27 Version 2 - Published 26 February 2021
PRESENTATIONPlease follow these guidelines:1. Label all parts clearly and use headings to guide the reader through your work. 2. Use 12pt font Arial or Times New Roman and 1.5 spacing.3. Provide your name, student number, and page numbers in a footnote.4. Submit your work in a Word document. Do not convert your work to pdf.5. Proof-read your work so that it is free of spelling, grammar, and punctuation mistakes. Use language that is appropriate for academic and professional tasks. Ensure you use respectful and appropriate terminology. For assistance, see Academic Skills: https://www.csu.edu.au/ current-students/learning-resources/build-your-skills/academic-skills-help6. Your reference list should contain all source documents that you refer to, quote or paraphrase from. It must conform to the APA referencing style. Please refer tohttps://www.csu.edu.au/current-students/learning-resources/build-your-skills/academic- skills-help/referencing for guidance and assistance with referencing.REQUIREMENTSPlease do not attempt your assignment without reading the relevant material (weeks 1-4) and attending lectures, or listening to the lecture recording where this is not possible.This assignment must be submitted through Turnitin.It is recommended that your name, student ID and page number are included in the header or footer of every page of the assignment.Further details about submission in Turnitin are provided in Alternative Assessment - submission process.