ASSESSMENT ITEM 3 (PART B): WRITTEN > LITERATURE REVIEW – LITERATURE REVIEW
|
|
Group or individual
|
|
Individual
|
Weighting
|
50%
|
Due date
|
1800h (AEST), Monday, 15 February 2021
|
Word Length
|
1500words
Word counts more than 10% above the required word limit will be penalised by
10% deduction of the marks available. The word count must be accurately stated at the end of the concluding paragraph. Every printed element between spaces is to be counted including quotations and in-text references (but not including reference list or appendices).
|
ASSESSMENT TASK 3 (Part B): DESCRIPTION
The aim of this assessment task is for you to demonstrate your ability to
critically appraise and synthesise literature on a topic and produce a narrative literature review.
1 Literature 1- Randomized Control Trails on Otago Exercise Program (OEP) to Reduce falls Among Elderly Community Dwellers in Shahroud, Iran
2. Falls and fractures in participants of a fall prevention exercise program for elderly women with history of falls: 1 year follow up
3. Reducing falls among older people in general practice: The ProAct65+exercise
Intervention trail
4. Effect of home- based exercise program on subsequent falls among community- Dwelling high – risk older adults after falls a randomized clinical trail
5 Falls prevention in a primary care setting
I don’t want introduction and Methodology, I can write as I searched this literatures.
I need help in Results and discussion. As I don’t have time to complete this assignment
1. Results: 750 words
- In results-
- Mention at least 3 major themes/ findings- Combine, compare and contrast the literature-
For example- Combine - Paper 1 find out A, B,
Paper 2: find out A, B and D
Compare: example- Mr smith(2018) find out A, B but Lauder(2016) find out A, B and D
Contrast- Example: 3 papers find out A, B but 4th
one find out C
- When you introduce paper first time in theme, you need to critically appraise the paper , then later you don’t need to do
· For example- Sample of paper, what was good about , what is theme, methology, (What was the design of the study?,What was the sample?, What were the data collection instruments and/or procedures?, How was the data analysed)
(A synthesis of the selected literature presented as:
• A critical appraisal of the rigor of literature, woven into the synthesis.
• The key themes identified after the literature has been analysed for common or unique themes
related to your research question.
)
2. A discussion of your results.
:750 words
- Recommendations for practice
- Further research, demonstrating exceptional analysis of results- Recommendation for future practice
- Limitation- its not about limitation of literatures- its about my limitation of this literature
3. A brief conclusion.
Key finding related to literature question
Throughout the literature review, use a wide range of relevant, current and reliable evidence to support the discussion. This would include literature that is in addition to your five chosen articles. You are expected to use correct APA 7th edition formatting throughout. The literature review must be written in third person and must follow the usual format for research papers including sections for Introduction, Methodology, Results, Discussion, Conclusion.
For guidance on standards for assessment preparation, including referencing, please see Assessment Preparation Guidelines.
|
|
|
|
Synthesis of literature presented as results
Weight 30%
|
Demonstrates sophisticated ability to critically appraise literature for rigor using a systematic appraisal process. Critique information expertly woven into the synthesis. Findings of the literature review are compared, contrasted and/or connected to each other demonstrating a sophisticated level of synthesis, relevant to the research question.
|
|
|
|
Page 17 of 21
Criteria
|
HD
|
C
|
P
|
N
|
|
Discussion
Weight 30%
|
A sophisticated discussion that presents the strengths and/or limitations of the literature review and recommendations for practice and further research, demonstrating exceptional analysis of results.
|
|
Conclusion
Weight 5%
|
A sophisticated conclusion that succinctly summarises the knowledge found from the review and astutely relates the knowledge gained to the research question.
|
|
Use of evidence
|
Judiciously integrates a wide range of relevant, current and reliable literature sources. APA 7th edition referencing conventions in both in-text referencing and reference list have always been applied accurately and consistently.
|
|
Weight 10%
|
|
Academic language (grammar, punctuation), academic structure (layout)
Weight 5%
|
Demonstrates
advanced
written communication skills, with evidence of:
Sophisticated language, including use of accurate terminology. Highly effective sequencing and structure of paragraphs in body. Very well constructed sentences and correct punctuation and spelling.
|
Demonstrates
very good
written communication skills, with evidence of:
Effective language, including use of accurate terminology. Effective sequencing and structure of paragraphs in body. Well-constructed sentences and very minor punctuation and spelling errors.
|
Demonstrates
sound
written communication skills, with evidence of:
Sound language, including use of accurate terminology. Logical sequencing and structure of paragraphs in body. Soundly constructed sentences and minor punctuation and spelling errors.
|
Demonstrates
satisfactory
written communication skills, with evidence of:
Basic language, including use of largely accurate terminology. Largely logical sequencing and structure of paragraphs in body. Satisfactorily constructed sentences and minor punctuation and spelling errors.
|
Demonstrates
poor
written communication skills, with evidence of:
Poor language, including use of inaccurate terminology. Inconsistent sequencing and structure of paragraphs in body. Poorly constructed sentences and significant punctuation and spelling errors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|