Assignment 2 case study & posterChoose on of the organisation regarding to supply chain management and do analysisAll the details are available in assignment briefAnd do poster part also
Page | 1 Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College 55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111 PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D Approved: DATE & Version Unit Code and Title: SBM2301 Supply Chain Fundamentals Assessment Overview Assessment Task Weighting Due Length ULO Assessment 1: Online Quiz MCQ of key content areas to identify further support required. The content of the MCQ is based on the weekly lectures/material. 25% Week 2-10 45 mins ULO1,2 Assessment 2: Case Study & Poster Analysis of case organisation on its mission, goals, strategies, operations and SWOT in its SC settings. Develop a poster to illustrate the case organisation’s supply chain capability capturing the analysis mentioned in item (i). 30% Week 9 1500 words ULO1,2,3 Assessment 3: Report & Presentation of plan for implementing supply chain management Analysis of case organisation supply chain management status identifying problems and recommending solutions Assessment 3: Power Point Slides/Presentation The presentation is to reflect tasks outlined in Assessment 2 and 3. 45% 20% Report) 25% Presentation Week 12 2000 words 15 mins ULO1,2,3, 4 and 5 Assessment Details Page | 2 Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College 55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111 PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D Approved: DATE & Version Assessment 1: Online Quiz Due date: Week 2 – 10 (Online) Group/individual: Individual Word count / Time provided: 30 mins Weighting: 25% Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO1 Assessment Details: This online quiz will assess your knowledge of key content areas and to identify further support needs. For successful completion of the quiz, you are required to study the material provided (lecture slides, tutorials, and reading materials), engage in the unit’s activities, and in the discussion forums. The prescribed textbook is the main reference along with the recommended reading material. By completing this assessment successfully, you will be able to identify key aspects of scope management as per best project management practices. This will then help in achieving ULO1 and ULO2 and ULO- 3. Marking Information: The quiz will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 10% of the total unit mark. Assessment 2: Case Study & Poster Due date: Week 9 Group/individual: Group Word count / Time provided: 1500 words Weighting: 30% (20% Report and 10% Poster) Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO1, 2 and 3 Assessment Details: The purpose of this assessment is to write a clear and objective summary of the case study on a case organisation related to its SCM. Students are to design a poster reflecting their area of research that is within the ambit of SCM. In the case study, the analysis should cover the case organisation’s mission, goals, strategies, operations and SWOT analysis. In addition, students are required to develop a poster should cover the following items: title of research, objective of research, goals, mission, objectives and SWOT analysis and implications. The focus of attention should be on subject content. The layout of the poster, among others, should be consistent with headings and subheadings, font and size are standardised. Use bulleted list to facilitate reading. Relate the content to the pictures it describes. The use of fancy fonts is to be avoided. Marking Information: The case study and poster will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 30% of the total unit mark. Page | 3 Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College 55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111 PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D Approved: DATE & Version Marking Criteria Not satisfactory (0-49%) of the criterion mark) Satisfactory (50-64%) of the criterion mark Good (65-74%) of the criterion mark Very Good (75-84%) of the criterion mark Excellent (85-100%) of the criterion mark Background of Organisation Developed a thorough and logical description of the case organisation in a clear and concise manner (20 marks) No evidence of thorough and logical description of the case organisation in a clear and concise manner. Some evidence of thorough and logical description of the case organisation in a clear and concise manner. Good evident of thorough and logical description of the case organisation in a clear and concise manner. Very good evident of thorough and logical description of the case organisation in a clear and concise manner. Excellent and thorough with logical description of the case organisation in a clear and concise manner has been developed. Analysis on Organisation A descriptive and well written analysis on the goals, mission, strategies and operations and SWOT analysis of case organisation was developed including adequate and well- constructed reasons/arguments (40 marks) Poor description and analysis on the goals, mission, strategies and operations and SWOT analysis of case organisation and inadequate and not well- constructed reasons/argumen ts Satisfactory description and written analysis on the goals, mission, strategies, operations and SWOT analysis of case organisation with satisfactory constructed reasons/arguments Good description and written analysis on the goals, mission, strategies, operations and SWOT analysis of case organisation and with good reasons and arguments Very good description and well written analysis on the goals, mission, strategies, operations and SWOT analysis of case organisation with very well constructed reasons/arguments Excellent description and analysis on the goals, mission, strategies, operations and SWOT analysis of case organisation and reasons /arguments are excellent presented Style of Formatting Harvard formatting style and citation of references in the body of the report (15 marks) Poor Harvard formatting style and citation of references in the body of the report Satisfactory Harvard formatting style and citation of references in the body of the report Good Harvard formatting style and citation of references in the body of the report Very good Harvard formatting style and citation of references in the body of the report Excellent Harvard formatting style and citation of references in the body of the report Report Structure, grammar, spelling and the overall presentation and integration of report (15 marks) Poor structure, grammar, spelling and the overall presentation and integration of report Satisfactory structure, grammar, spelling and the overall presentation and integration of report Good structure, grammar, spelling and the overall presentation and integration of report Very good structure, grammar, spelling and the overall presentation and integration of report Excellent structure, grammar, spelling and the overall presentation and integration of report Poster Clarity and Continuity: Poor depiction of the case organisation SC analysis and poorly Satisfactory depiction of the case organisation SC analysis and Good depiction of the case organisation SC analysis and well- structured and designed. Very good depiction of the case organisation SC analysis and well- Excellent depiction of the case organisation SC analysis and excellently structured and designed. Page | 4 Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College 55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111 PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D Approved: DATE & Version Depicting the case organisation SC analysis clearly, well- structured and designed. (10 marks) structured and designed. adequately structured and designed. structured and designed. Assessment 3: Report & Presentation of Plan for Implementation of Supply Chain Due date: Week 12 Group/individual: Group Word count / Time provided: 2000 words and Presentation (15 mins) Weighting: 45% (20% Report and 25% Presentation) Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO1,2, 3 and 4 Assessment Details: In this assessment, the student would be provided a scenario in decision-making situations. Analysis of case organisation supply chain management status identifying problems and recommending solutions. Students are encouraged to send the report to the Lecturer in Week 7 for feedback before the submission in Week 12. Marking Information: Assessment 3 will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 45% of the total unit mark. Marking Criteria Not satisfactory (0-49%) of the criterion mark) Satisfactory (50-64%) of the criterion mark Good (65-74%) of the criterion mark Very Good (75-84%) of the criterion mark Excellent (85-100%) of the criterion mark Background of Organisation Identification and description of the case organisation position in the supply chain (10 marks) Poor identification and description