PowerPoint Presentation Final Assignment 3 Update CMM92001 Risk and Resilience Engineering – Assignment 3 Outline Information 29 Sep 19 • HINT: The information in you Risk Matrix is closely connected...

Assignment Brief You are to write a Safety Case Report reflecting on the Risk Matrix that you have completed in Weeks 2-11. You are to incorporate items discussed in the RE workshops as part of this report. The body of the report will be structured by you to achieve the best possible communication with the reader. Your intended audience is senior executives and other external senior stakeholders relating to safety and risk management.


PowerPoint Presentation Final Assignment 3 Update CMM92001 Risk and Resilience Engineering – Assignment 3 Outline Information 29 Sep 19 • HINT: The information in you Risk Matrix is closely connected to the development of your Safety Case Report • Safety Case Report Overall Concepts • Outline the most significant risks in a project • Outline all the Risks identified in a project • Categorize the Risks (Safety, Performance, Environment) • Sub Categorize the Risks (Very High, High, Medium, Low) • Outline the Mitigations • How are the Mitigations Implemented (Implementation Plan) • Safety Management System (SMS) Concept Outline • You must be able to link the SCR assignment to Assignment 4 so you can effectively present your findings. • Google “Safety Case Report Template” to find templates to use as a GUIDE ONLY If we find you copying information without appropriate referencing you will be referred for Academic Misconduct • The assignment structure is in a report format as per the SCU Report Guide. Additionally the intention of this assignment is to give you some flexibility in developing your own Safety Case Report format taking into consideration the information already provided. It is up to you as the “ Engineering Manager” to determine the correct format given the industry you are working in. • Follow the Rubric carefully. HINT: The way you structure your report will determine the marks you receive in the Structure Section of the Marking Rubric • Categorize and prioritize the risks in your last Risk Matrix. You should have a list of (Very High, High, Medium, & Low) As your final Residual Risk Score. Discuss your mitigation decisions, use academic and industry referencing as much as possible. Don’t just run with bare minimum on the number of academic references per the marking rubric. The more references you use both direct and in-text will result in a higher quality report and higher marks, overall. • Review all scenario updates and re-check your risk matrix to see if it all makes sense. CMM92001 Risk and Resilience Engineering – Assignment 3 Outline Information 29 Sep 19 Additional Information Overview of Scenario Updates CMM92001 Risk and Resilience Engineering – Assignment 3 Outline Information 29 Sep 19 Week Scenario Update Week 1 Principal Scenario: You are the Engineering Manager for a large Ship building company assigned to a new Submarine building program. The Program scope is to execute the build of a fleet of conventional diesel powered Submarines for your countries Navy. One of your main duties is to manage the Risk Assessment Matrix for the program relating to the engineering and build of the submarines electrical, mechanical, communications and environmental monitoring systems. In week 1 you will have an outline of some of the initial risks from a kick off risk workshop. Each Week you will receive project updates and you will need to extract any known or identified risks and update the risk matrix accordingly. Week 2 The project is mid flight and you have started to receive the initial pre-fabricated materials for the submarine hull and platform construction. The submarine is built in modular sections and requires a large amount of heavy lifting equipment, welding specialists, and metal testing professionals. Additionally you have been advised by your security manager that there have been targeted protests posted online however no specific information relating to date and time has been published. Week 3 You have employed a team of 6 new electrical engineers to provide design input into the submarines new electrical control systems. These systems are highly complex and the project intends on implementing a new Artifical Inteligence Safety system. The original design requirements were not clearly set out and you are intending on calling a meeting with the head engineer to clarify the overall system requirements Week 4 The Mechanical engineers have advised that there are issues with the new diesel generators being installed onboard the submarines and require full removal for rectification. Currently they have been fully installed and the hulls have been welded in on the first 2 submarines and the remaining 8 submarines are in line for installation. The diesel generators will need to be shipped back to the manufacturer in Germany for repair with a turn around time of 6-9 weeks per diesel. Week 5 You are now 12 months into the program and the environmental management systems are being installed into the first 5 submarine hulls. These include Carbon Dioxide converters, Oxygen Generators and Desalination plants. You have been advised by the WHS and human engineering department that the Desalination systems have not yet been fully tested in your local region and they are unsure of the performance of these systems when used in different climatic conditions. Additionally you have been made aware by procurement that there has been a major natural disaster event at the manufacturing factory for the Oxygen Generators and the suppler is unable to provide any details on the next shipments of the devices. You have currently received 50% of the Oxygen Generators needed for the whole fleet. Week 6 During the construction process an electrical fire has broken out in the main electrical component room of the submarine during initial system integration testing. This has resulted in severe injury to five electrical technicians and the Electrical Engineering Supervisor. The investigation into the incident has found that somehow counterfeit electrical components were installed into the electrical systems. Week 7 Project is now mid flight and after recent Federal elections there has been a change in Government from the highly supportive Liberal government to a combined Nation First / Environmentalist Government. The new Government has undertaken a review of the current project and are considering to de-scope the build of the last three submarines. This has resulted in the project schedule being cut by 25% and loss of over $12 billion of contracts Week 8 Local Government pressure has increased on the construction company to employ as many local people as possible whils the project still maintains viability. The issue is that there is a fundamental lack of the appropiately skilled workers however the Businesses HR delegates have decided to hire additional local staff to work in Trade and Technical Roles to satisfy the Local Government Officials Week 9 Worker Strike action has been threatened to management due to the employment of the unkilled local workers and resulting decrease of site safety. Management is now under immense pressure to rectify the issues ASAP otherwise there will be a sitewide strike and walkout halting construction of the Submarines. Week 10 There is real potential due to the previous weeks scenarios that the project is starting to come under significant financial and schedule pressure. Management is considering cutting back on all unnecessary testing activities including auditing of the supply chain management and design verification activities. Week 11 Construction of the first Submarine has completed however there have been a number of critical safety test activities that have been cancelled due to increased cost and schedule impacts. It is expected that the first Submarine will depart the harbour for sea trials in 3-4 weeks. You have been asked to undertake a full re-view of the current risks and determine if the Submarine is safe to set sail for this highly important project milestone. CMM92001 Risk and Resilience Engineering – Assignment 3 Outline Information 29 Sep 19 • New Due Date: 06 October 2019 12:00pm (No exceptions or Extensions unless under exceptional circumstances) • No further information updates will be released for this assignment • Good Luck Final Notes CMM92001 Risk and Resilience Engineering – Assignment 3 Outline Information 29 Sep 19 Authors Dr Jeremy Novak, Mr James Palmer, Mr George Mattamana, and Mr Sebi Abi MEM/MBA Program Page 1 of 3 CMM92001-2019-2: Risk and Resilience Engineering Assessment 3 Safety Case Report Assignment One Requirements: Due Date: 06 October 2019 12:00pm Length: 2500 words =/- 10% Format: Word document Weighting: 35% of total unit marks Submission: Through turn it in the Assessment Details section of the unit Black Board site. Referencing Harvard Assignment Brief You are to write a Safety Case Report reflecting on the Risk Matrix that you have completed in Weeks 2-11. You are to incorporate items discussed in the RE workshops as part of this report. The body of the report will be structured by you to achieve the best possible communication with the reader. Your intended audience is senior executives and other external senior stakeholders relating to safety and risk management. The report also needs to include: SCU Cover-sheet: This is the cover-sheet that SCU requires all students to place on the front of all Assignments. Title-page: The title-page is the page that all authors put on the reports and submissions that they write as professionals. Contains a Title e.g. “Safety Case Report on Risk Management Issues and Mitigations” Title: Contains the name of the author i.e. you. Contains the File Name and Version number of the report, Contains the date the report was completed Header & Footer: The Header must contain your name and your student number. The Footer must contain the Unit number i.e. CMM92001 and the page number (Page numbering commences after the title-page), your full name and your student number (first name, second name, student number). You must save your Word document as your first name last name and student number. For example Fred_Smith_12345. Academic References: For the purposes of this report you will need to provide a minimum of 5 Academic References that you need to connect to Risk Management and Resilience in Engineering. Failure to provide a minimum of 5 references will incur a max 40% mark of this portion of the assignment. Authors Dr Jeremy Novak, Mr James Palmer, Mr George Mattamana, and Mr Sebi Abi MEM/MBA Program Page 2 of 3 Marking Rubric for Assignment 1 (Safety Case Report) Excellent 85%‒100% Very Good 75%‒84% Good 65%‒74% Satisfactory 50%‒64% Unacceptable 0%‒49% Response to assigned topic, the understanding of relevant literature, theory, and assignment Structure:: (about 75% of total mark for the assignment) Structure: The Safety Case Report was very comprehensive and had excellent structure with no errors. The Safety Case Report was comprehensive and had very good structure with some errors. The Safety Case Report had good structure. and appropriate content but with some errors. The Safety Case Report consisted of suitable information, had generally suitable structure although some aspects could have been improved The Safety Case Report did not have suitable structure and information Response to assigned topic: The Safety Case Report responded directly to the topic and to every separate part of the