Assignment - EA FrameworkWord limit: XXXXXXXXXXwords(+/- 10%)The following unit learning outcomes are assessed:·Appraise the constituents of enterprise architecture.-You need to...

1 answer below »









Assignment - EA Framework














Word limit:








2000 - 3000 words(+/- 10%)





















The following unit learning outcomes are assessed:











·








Appraise the constituents of enterprise architecture.








-








You need to first understand the constituents of EA framework before your evaluation.








·








Evaluate global frameworks used for enterprise architecture and their application in different sectors including private and government.








-








The assignment allows you to evaluate how a certain EA framework is applied in a specific context.








·








Assess how governance frameworks support the strategic alignment of enterprise architecture.








-








The assignment allows you to evaluate how a certain EA framework helps promote the alignment between strategy and technology (or not).








·








Create enterprise architecture using standard notations to support strategy and business driven views of the enterprise.








-








The assignment requires to model the framework with ArchiMate




















Instructions











·

















Assignment




















(Instruction Attached)
























·











Framework document (Framework Attached)


























Hints and Tips (Very important)

















·








APA 7threferencing standards will apply to all parts of this assessment.

Students are instructed to include the page number in both in-text and end-of-text referencing.Failure to do this may result in an academic integrity enquiry being made on your latest assignment submission(s). e.g: (Crothers & Santella, p. 6, 2018)















Assignment 1 1 MAN6936 ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURES Assignment Weighting: 60% Instructions During the class we have discussed that there are different types of EA frameworks, with various assumptions, structures, etc. In this assignment you will compare the framework in one case (i.e., organization) with the EA3 cube framework from the textbook, and evaluate how they are similar to or different from each other. The link of the framework is provided below: https://www.forgov.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/322607/queensland- government-enterprise-architecture-framework-2-0-v-1-0-0.pdf Completing this assignment will help you achieve Course Learning Outcome (CLO) 2 Apply critical thinking and technical skills to solve authentic business problems [AQF S2, S3]: 2.1. Conceptualise problems or situations (critically investigate, analyse, synthesize and evaluate). 2.2. Apply technical skills to authentic situations. 2.3. Solve complex problems. In addition to the above following unit learning outcomes are assessed: • Appraise the constituents of enterprise architecture. o You need to first understand the constituents of EA framework before your evaluation. • Evaluate global frameworks used for enterprise architecture and their application in different sectors including private and government. o The assignment allows you to evaluate how a certain EA framework is applied in a specific context. • Assess how governance frameworks support the strategic alignment of enterprise architecture. o The assignment allows you to evaluate how a certain EA framework helps promote the alignment between strategy and technology (or not). • Create enterprise architecture using standard notations to support strategy and business driven views of the enterprise. o The assignment requires to model the framework with ArchiMate 2 Structure of your report Your report could follow the structure below (though you do not have to): Part I: Introduction – provide the background and purpose(s) of this report. The background need to let readers understand the importance of EA. The purpose needs to be clearly stated to help readers understand what this report is about. Case Description – briefly introduce the organization which implemented the framework. This part needs to give readers reasonable information of the organization, such as which industry it is from, whether it is a large or a small-to- medium organization, products/services provided, etc. Architecture in the case – Discuss the EA framework in the case. In this part you need to discuss different levels (or sections) of the framework, as well as EA components in different levels (or sections). Comparison – Discuss how the EA framework in the case is different from the EA3 cube framework in the textbook (table/figure can be used). In this part you need to compare the levels (or sections) of the case framework with the EA3 cube framework, and describe how these levels (or sections) are similar to or different from each other. Conclusion – State the benefits of the EA framework implemented in the case; Discuss if the EA framework in the case is more appropriate in the context of the case than the EA3 cube framework (if so, why; if not, why not). It is possible that the EA framework in the case is quite similar to the EA3 cube framework. You could argue that it is just an adapted version of the EA3 cube framework. It is preferred that you use the literature to support your argument. Improvement based on the feedback from Studiosity: Studiosity (Canvas > Student Support > Connect to Studiosity is a free service to ECU students. About one week before the deadline, please submit Part A to Studiosity and get feedback regarding how to improve assignment. In this part, you need to provide a screenshot of your Studiosity submission, list feedback received and changes you made. Failure to do so will let you fail this section (please refer to the marking rubric). Part II: You need to use ArchiMate to model a certain service (https://www.wa.gov.au/services). You can pick one which you are familiar with, and model the business layer based upon the information from the site as long as your personal experiences. Then you can make your own assumptions to model the application and the technology layer. Your modeling do not need to cover 100% details (which may not available online), but need to include major services based upon the service you selected. You do not need to provide detailed explanation of the service. You may state your assumptions, and provide explanations for certain business functions/processes in the modeling. https://www.wa.gov.au/services imrin You can pick : Fines Enforcement Registry  3 A very useful guide as to how to plan and write your report can be found at https://www.monash.edu/student-academic-success/excel-at-writing/annotated- assessment-samples/information-technology/it-report To better understand how to write with references and sources of information you should go to http://www.phrasebank.manchester.ac.uk/ Referencing style: the preferred style for this report is APA. Length: Approximately 2000-3000 words (+/- 10%) not including references or appendices. Marking Guide: The following rubric will be used: Part I: 40% HD D C P N 8-10 7-7.9 6-6.9 5-5.9 0-4.9 Introduction and case description (25%) The introduction provides a strong motivation (with strong support from both academic and practical sources), and clearly state the purpose of this report. Report clearly describes the background of the case. The introduction provides good motivation (with some support), and clearly state the purpose of this report. Report clearly describes the background of the case. The introduction provides some background, and state the purpose of this report. Report describes some background of the case. The introduction state the purpose of this report. Report describes some background of the case. The introduction does not state the purpose of this report. Report provides little background of the case. 8-10 7-7.9 6-6.9 5-5.9 0-4.9 Architecture in the case and comparison (25%) (CLO 2.1, 2.3) Report clearly describes the framework in the case and comprehensive compare it with EA3 (comprehensive and completed understandings of EA is demonstrated). Report clearly describes the framework in the case and highlight its main differences with EA3 (broad and strong understandings of EA is demonstrated). Report clearly describes the framework in the case and discuss some differences with EA3 (reasonably and strong understandings of EA is demonstrated). Report provides some descriptions regarding the framework in the case and its main differences with EA3 (moderated understandings of EA is demonstrated). Report provides insufficient descriptions regarding the framework in the case and its main differences with EA3 (little understanding of EA is shown). 8-10 7-7.9 6-6.9 5-5.9 0-4.9 Conclusion (25%) (CLO 2.1, 2.3) Report critically and deeply evaluates the framework in the case regarding its appropriateness, with support from the literature. Adequately discusses changes made based upon the feedback from Studiosity. Report evaluates the framework in the case regarding its appropriateness, with support from the literature. Reasonably discusses changes made based upon the feedback from Studiosity. Report evaluates the framework in the case regarding its appropriateness. Discusses some changes made based upon the feedback from Studiosity. Report states the appropriateness of the framework in the case. Discusses only few changes made based upon the feedback from Studiosity. Report provides little discussions regarding the appropriateness of the framework in the case. Did not show evidence of submitting Part A to Studiosity, or did not discuss any changes made based upon the feedback. 2-2.5 1.75-1.95 1.5-1.70 1.25-1.45 0-1.2 Flow (6.25%) The organisation logical and the content cohesive. The organisation is logical, and there is cohesion throughout the report. The organisation is logical, however some areas need further development. There is some repetition between sections. Organisation is generally clear, but lacks cohesion which makes the ideas difficult to follow. Some unnecessary duplication of ideas or Organisation seems disorganised, and there is almost no cohesion between different sections. Repetition of ideas may also be frequent. https://www.monash.edu/student-academic-success/excel-at-writing/annotated-assessment-samples/information-technology/it-report https://www.monash.edu/student-academic-success/excel-at-writing/annotated-assessment-samples/information-technology/it-report http://www.phrasebank.manchester.ac.uk/ 4 information may be present. 2-2.5 1.75-1.95 1.5-1.70 1.25-1.45 0-1.2 Word choice, punctuation, grammar and spelling (6.25%) Writing is error free There is only the occasional error in word choice, grammar, spelling and punctuation. There may be some errors in word choice, grammar, spelling and punctuation, but these mostly do not interfere with meaning. The number of errors in word choice, grammar, spelling and punctuation make it difficult at times to understand the ideas, and/or effect cohesion of the text. Report has serious and persistent errors in word choice, grammar, spelling and punctuation which significantly interferes with meaning. 2-2.5 1.75-1.95 1.5-1.70 1.25-1.45 0-1.2 Presentation (6.25%) Professional physical layout and attention to detail. Well designed physical layout and attention to detail. Only the occasional formatting error. Clear layout with work neatly presented. Maybe occasional formatting errors. Acceptable physical layout, but not consistently applied to each part of the report. Some errors. Physical layout detracts from the content of the report. May be inconsistent design, or inappropriate design. Significant number of formatting errors. 2-2.5 1.75-1.95 1.5-1.70 1.25-1.45 0-1.2 Reference (6.25%) Cited appropriate in the body of the report No mistake in the reference list. Most in-text citations are correct. A few mistakes in the reference list. Most in-text citations are correct. Some problems with the reference list. Some in-text citations are not correct. Some problems with the reference list. Most in-text citations are not correct. Lots of mistakes in the reference list. Part II 20% HD D C P N 16-20 14-15.9 12-13.9 10-11.9 0-9.9 ArchiMate modelling (CLO 2.2) The modelling is fully consistent with the framework. The modelling is mostly consistent with the framework. The modelling is reasonably consistent with the framework (have some minor inconsistencies). The modelling is similar to the framework, but have major inconsistencies. The modelling is quite different from the framework Submission instructions: You should submit your assignment using Canvas. Please note that you need to submit Part I and Part II separately through a different portal. Late submissions will be penalised at the rate of 5 marks per day late or part thereof unless prior approval for an extension has been gained. Where the assignment is more than 7 calendar days late, a mark of zero shall be awarded. You should submit your assignment as a one word-processed document. So your work doesn't get mixed up with others’, use a filename which follows
Answered 13 days AfterAug 20, 2024

Answer To: Assignment - EA FrameworkWord limit: XXXXXXXXXXwords(+/- 10%)The following unit learning...

Shubham answered on Aug 26 2024
5 Votes
Part I
Introduction
Enterprise Architecture has an important role in modern organizations by providing structured approach. It is aligned with IT infrastructure with business goals. The Queensland Government Enterprise Architecture framework is considered as cornerstone for Queensland Government that guides development and management of IT systems in agencies. Implementation by Department of Communities, Housing and Digital Economy. The QGEA ensures that technological advancements are effectively integrated for promoting interoperability, efficiency and strategic alignment. The department can ensure better operations that can enhance service delivery and ensure that IT investments align with broader governmental objectives. The purpose of the report is to ex
plore Department of Queensland Government of Communities Housing and Digital Economy that utilizes QGEA framework to drive digital transformation initiatives. The report will provide in-depth analysis of implementation strategies of department. The challenges face and outcomes can be achieved. The report aims to provide information about effectiveness of QGEA framework and role in shaping IT landscape of department.
Case Description
The Queensland Government is the governing authority of Queensland, Australia that operates as a large public sector entity. It manages various portfolios, including health, education, transport, infrastructure and environmental protection. It is headed by the Premier, the government consists of elected representatives within the Queensland Parliament. This passes legislation and policies to serve 5 million residents of state. Government departments and agencies are responsible for implementing these policies, providing essential public services and ensuring compliance with laws. As a significant employer in Queensland, the government plays an important role in economic development and public welfare of state. The Department of Communities, Housing and Digital Economy of Queensland Government is the key government agency that is responsible for delivering essential public services. It supports community well-being, housing accessibility and digital transformation in Queensland. The department plays an important role in ensuring that communities of state are inclusive and well-supported. This can help in driving digital innovation to enhance public service delivery.
Industry and Sector
The DCHDE operates in the public sector that focuses on community services, housing and digital economy initiatives. As the government entity, the department is part of larger Queensland Government structure (Al-Kharusi, Miskon & Bahari, 2018). It works on implementing policies and programs that align with state and federal mandates. The department is involved in social services, urban planning, public housing, and digital infrastructure. This can help in making it organization with broad impact on socio-economic landscape of state.
Organizational Size and Structure
The DCHDE is large organization that includes thousands of public servants across Queensland. It is organized into different divisions and every division is responsible for different aspects of mandate of department. This includes Community Services, Housing and Homelessness and Digital Economy. The size and complexity of department require robust governance structures. It operates under guidance of senior executives including Director-General and different Assistant Directors-General that oversee specific portfolios. The reach and service of department can offer approach to managing operations and resources.
Products and Services
1. Community Services: The department provides support programs that aims to strengthen communities and promoting social inclusion. The programs address issues like domestic violence, youth support and disability services. It ensures that vulnerable populations have access to the resources that are required.
2. Housing and Homelessness Services: The primary responsibilities of department are to provide affordable housing solutions to low-income individuals and families. This includes management and development of public housing, rental assistance programs and initiatives to combat homelessness (Ahmad, Drus & Kasim, 2020). The department also collaborates with non-profit organizations and private sector partners to expand housing options across the state.
3. Digital Economy and Transformation: The Queensland continues to advance in digital age and DCHDE leads initiatives aims to enhance digital infrastructure and services. This includes developing strategies for digital inclusion for supporting growth of digital economy and ensuring that government services are accessible online (Bente, Bombosch & Langade, 2012). The department is responsible for implementation of digital projects that improve efficiency and effectiveness of public services. This can help in making government more accessible and responsive to the needs of citizens.
Role of QGEA in DCHDE
The extensive responsibilities of department are implementation of Queensland Government Enterprise Architecture framework that is important. The QGEA provides structured approach to align IT infrastructure of department with strategic goals. It ensures that all digital initiatives are integrated, interoperable and scalable. The framework helps DCHDE to manage complex array of services and programs by providing standards and guidelines for technology adoption, data management and service delivery (Oberhauser, 2019). The role of QGEA in department ensures that all technological investments and innovations support goal of enhancing community well-being and driving digital transformation in Queensland.
Architecture in the case
The Queensland Government Enterprise Architecture framework includes comprehensive and multi-layered structure that is designed to align with IT infrastructure and business processes of Queensland Government agencies with strategic objectives. The framework provides systematic approach to manage and integrate information, applications and technology across the government. This ensures consistency, interoperability and efficiency. The QGEA framework is important for guiding digital transformation and ensure that all technological initiatives support mission of department.
Levels of the QGEA Framework
1. Business Architecture:
· Overview: The Business Architecture level includes aligning with business strategies of organization and processes with IT infrastructure. The level defines core business functions, processes and services that organization provides.
· In DCHDE: Business Architecture includes strategic planning of community services, housing programs and digital initiatives. It ensures that all services are delivered in the way to meet goals of department like promoting social inclusion and advancing digital transformation.
2. Information Architecture:
· Overview: Information Architecture focuses on management and organization of data in the enterprise. It defines structure of data and the way it is stored, accessed and used (Gallegos-Baeza et al. 2023). This can help in ensuring that information flows efficiently across organization.
· In DCHDE: The Information Architecture in DCHDE is important for managing large vast amounts of data related to housing, community services and digital projects. It ensures that data is consistent, accurate and accessible to support decision-making and service delivery. Data related to public housing allocations and community support programs is required to be integrated and accessible to different departments in the organization.
3. Application Architecture:
· Overview: Application...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here