Assignment Overview
Research you’re company’s network security. Investigate the following: LAN/WAN, Web/internet/firewalls and wireless network. Conduct a vulnerability audit using a network vulnerability scanner. Recommend the most appropriate way to secure each network device and services.
State what software and hardware the company is using (as many as you can find out). Draw the network architecture. Identify network security weaknesses and recommend solutions.
Your final report must include the following:
·
Assignment Cover Page: (Use the cover sheet provided. Include the Title,
· Assignment number, Student Names and IDs, Subject)
·
Title page
(Name of report who it is prepared for, and authors)
·
Executive summary
(1 paragraph)
·
Table of contents
·
Body (Numerous headings and text at the write choice)
·
References/ Bibliography
BIT243 Network Security Assignment 2 BIT243: Network Security Assignment 2 (20%) Total: 20 Marks Assignment Overview Research you’re company’s network security. Investigate the following: LAN/WAN, Web/internet/firewalls and wireless network. Conduct a vulnerability audit using a network vulnerability scanner. Recommend the most appropriate way to secure each network device and services. State what software and hardware the company is using (as many as you can find out). Draw the network architecture. Identify network security weaknesses and recommend solutions. Your final report must include the following: · Assignment Cover Page: (Use the cover sheet provided. Include the Title, · Assignment number, Student Names and IDs, Subject) · Title page (Name of report who it is prepared for, and authors) · Executive summary (1 paragraph) · Table of contents · Body (Numerous headings and text at the write choice) · References/ Bibliography Submission: Week 8: Chosen Company (No two students do the same topic) Week 11: Final Report (TurnItIn via MOODLE) – 20% See MOODLE for the exact dates and times. Plagiarism All used sources must be properly acknowledged with references and citations, if you did not create it. Quotations and paraphrasing are allowed but the sources must be acknowledged. Failure to do so is regarded as plagiarism and the minimum penalty for plagiarism is failure for the assignment. The act of given your assignment to another student is classified as a plagiarism offence. Copying large chucks and supplying a reference will result in zero marks as you have not contributed to the report. Copying from Youtube or other videos is also plagiarism (including transcripts). Citation in a video can be included as credits at the end. ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW AND FEEDBACK SUMMARY All assessments (except for final examination) and feedback are provided via the MOODLE site and in classes. Assessment Tasks: Due Date Subject Learning Outcomes Course Learning Outcomes MP Graduate Attributes Weight (%) Comments Exam End of Semester a, b, c, d. 1,2,3A, B, C50% Individual Marking criteria: Marks are allocated as indicated on each question, taking the following aspects into account: Aspects Description Analysis (if appropriate) Investigation, comparison, discussion Explanation/justification Description/answer to the question Presentation Inadequate structure, careless presentation, poor writing Reference style Proper referencing if required Plagiarism Copy from another student, copy from internet source/textbook, copy from other sources without proper acknowledgement Marking Rubric for Exercise Answers Grade Mark HD 80%+ D 70%-79% CR 60%-69% P 50%-59% Fail < 50%="" excellent="" very="" good="" good="" satisfactory="" unsatisfactory="" analysis="" logic="" is="" clear="" and="" easy="" to="" follow="" with="" strong="" arguments="" consistency="" logical="" and="" convincing="" mostly="" consistent="" and="" convincing="" adequate="" cohesion="" and="" conviction="" argument="" is="" confused="" and="" disjointed="" effort/difficulties/="" challenges="" the="" presented="" solution="" demonstrated="" an="" extreme="" degree="" of="" difficulty="" that="" would="" require="" an="" expert="" to="" implement.="" the="" presented="" solution="" demonstrated="" a="" high="" degree="" of="" difficulty="" that="" would="" be="" an="" advance="" professional="" to="" implement.="" the="" presented="" solution="" demonstrated="" an="" average="" degree="" of="" difficulty="" that="" would="" be="" an="" average="" professional="" to="" implement.="" the="" presented="" solution="" demonstrated="" a="" low="" degree="" of="" difficulty="" that="" would="" be="" easy="" to="" implement.="" the="" presented="" solution="" demonstrated="" a="" poor="" degree="" of="" difficulty="" that="" would="" be="" too="" easy="" to="" implement.="" explanation/="" justification="" all="" elements="" are="" present="" and="" well="" integrated.="" components="" present="" with="" good="" cohesion="" components="" present="" and="" mostly="" well="" integrated="" most="" components="" present="" lacks="" structure.="" reference="" style="" clear="" styles="" with="" excellent="" source="" of="" references.="" clear="" referencing/="" style="" generally="" good="" referencing/style="" unclear="" referencing/style="" lacks="" consistency="" with="" many="" errors="" presentation="" proper="" writing.="" professionally="" presented="" properly="" spoken,="" with="" some="" minor="" deficiencies="" mostly="" good,="" but="" some="" structure="" or="" presentation="" problems="" acceptable="" presentation="" poor="" structure,="" careless="" presentation="" melbourne="" polytechnic="" page="" 2="" of="" 4="" bit243="" network="" security="" assignment="" 2="" bit243:="" network="" security="" assignment="" 2="" (20%)="" total:="" 20="" marks="" assignment="" overview="" research="" you’re="" company’s="" network="" security.="" investigate="" the="" following:="" lan/wan,="" web/internet/firewalls="" and="" wireless="" network.="" conduct="" a="" vulnerability="" audit="" using="" a="" network="" vulnerability="" scanner.="" recommend="" the="" most="" appropriate="" way="" to="" secure="" each="" network="" device="" and="" services.="" state="" what="" software="" and="" hardware="" the="" company="" is="" using="" (as="" many="" as="" you="" can="" find="" out).="" draw="" the="" network="" architecture.="" identify="" network="" security="" weaknesses="" and="" recommend="" solutions.="" your="" final="" report="" must="" include="" the="" following:="" ·="" assignment="" cover="" page:="" (use="" the="" cover="" sheet="" provided.="" include="" the="" title,="" ·="" assignment="" number,="" student="" names="" and="" ids,="" subject)="" ·="" title="" page="" (name="" of="" report="" who="" it="" is="" prepared="" for,="" and="" authors)="" ·="" executive="" summary="" (1="" paragraph)="" ·="" table="" of="" contents="" ·="" body="" (numerous="" headings="" and="" text="" at="" the="" write="" choice)="" ·="" references/="" bibliography="" submission:="" week="" 8:="" chosen="" company="" (no="" two="" students="" do="" the="" same="" topic)="" week="" 11:="" final="" report="" (turnitin="" via="" moodle)="" –="" 20%="" see="" moodle="" for="" the="" exact="" dates="" and="" times.="" plagiarism="" all="" used="" sources="" must="" be="" properly="" acknowledged="" with="" references="" and="" citations,="" if="" you="" did="" not="" create="" it.="" quotations="" and="" paraphrasing="" are="" allowed="" but="" the="" sources="" must="" be="" acknowledged.="" failure="" to="" do="" so="" is="" regarded="" as="" plagiarism="" and="" the="" minimum="" penalty="" for="" plagiarism="" is="" failure="" for="" the="" assignment.="" the="" act="" of="" given="" your="" assignment="" to="" another="" student="" is="" classified="" as="" a="" plagiarism="" offence.="" copying="" large="" chucks="" and="" supplying="" a="" reference="" will="" result="" in="" zero="" marks="" as="" you="" have="" not="" contributed="" to="" the="" report.="" copying="" from="" youtube="" or="" other="" videos="" is="" also="" plagiarism="" (including="" transcripts).="" citation="" in="" a="" video="" can="" be="" included="" as="" credits="" at="" the="" end.="" assessment="" overview="" and="" feedback="" summary="" all="" assessments="" (except="" for="" final="" examination)="" and="" feedback="" are="" provided="" via="" the="" moodle="" site="" and="" in="" classes.="" assessment="" tasks:="" due="" date="" subject="" learning="" outcomes="" course="" learning="" outcomes="" mp="" graduate="" attributes="" weight="" (%)="" comments="" exam="" end="" of="" semester="" a,="" b,="" c,="" d.="" 1,2,3="" a,="" b,="" c="" 50%="" individual="" marking="" criteria:="" marks="" are="" allocated="" as="" indicated="" on="" each="" question,="" taking="" the="" following="" aspects="" into="" account:="" aspects="" description="" analysis="" (if="" appropriate)="" investigation,="" comparison,="" discussion="" explanation/justification="" description/answer="" to="" the="" question="" presentation="" inadequate="" structure,="" careless="" presentation,="" poor="" writing="" reference="" style="" proper="" referencing="" if="" required="" plagiarism="" copy="" from="" another="" student,="" copy="" from="" internet="" source/textbook,="" copy="" from="" other="" sources="" without="" proper="" acknowledgement="" marking="" rubric="" for="" exercise="" answers="" grade="" mark="" hd="" 80%+="" d="" 70%-79%="" cr="" 60%-69%="" p="" 50%-59%="" fail="">< 50% excellent very good good satisfactory unsatisfactory analysis logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments consistency logical and convincing mostly consistent and convincing adequate cohesion and conviction argument is confused and disjointed effort/difficulties/ challenges the presented solution demonstrated an extreme degree of difficulty that would require an expert to implement. the presented solution demonstrated a high degree of difficulty that would be an advance professional to implement. the presented solution demonstrated an average degree of difficulty that would be an average professional to implement. the presented solution demonstrated a low degree of difficulty that would be easy to implement. the presented solution demonstrated a poor degree of difficulty that would be too easy to implement. explanation/ justification all elements are present and well integrated. components present with good cohesion components present and mostly well integrated most components present lacks structure. reference style clear styles with excellent source of references. clear referencing/ style generally good referencing/style unclear referencing/style lacks consistency with many errors presentation proper writing. professionally presented properly spoken, with some minor deficiencies mostly good, but some structure or presentation problems acceptable presentation poor structure, careless presentation melbourne polytechnicpage 2 of 4 50%="" excellent="" very="" good="" good="" satisfactory="" unsatisfactory="" analysis="" logic="" is="" clear="" and="" easy="" to="" follow="" with="" strong="" arguments="" consistency="" logical="" and="" convincing="" mostly="" consistent="" and="" convincing="" adequate="" cohesion="" and="" conviction="" argument="" is="" confused="" and="" disjointed="" effort/difficulties/="" challenges="" the="" presented="" solution="" demonstrated="" an="" extreme="" degree="" of="" difficulty="" that="" would="" require="" an="" expert="" to="" implement.="" the="" presented="" solution="" demonstrated="" a="" high="" degree="" of="" difficulty="" that="" would="" be="" an="" advance="" professional="" to="" implement.="" the="" presented="" solution="" demonstrated="" an="" average="" degree="" of="" difficulty="" that="" would="" be="" an="" average="" professional="" to="" implement.="" the="" presented="" solution="" demonstrated="" a="" low="" degree="" of="" difficulty="" that="" would="" be="" easy="" to="" implement.="" the="" presented="" solution="" demonstrated="" a="" poor="" degree="" of="" difficulty="" that="" would="" be="" too="" easy="" to="" implement.="" explanation/="" justification="" all="" elements="" are="" present="" and="" well="" integrated.="" components="" present="" with="" good="" cohesion="" components="" present="" and="" mostly="" well="" integrated="" most="" components="" present="" lacks="" structure.="" reference="" style="" clear="" styles="" with="" excellent="" source="" of="" references.="" clear="" referencing/="" style="" generally="" good="" referencing/style="" unclear="" referencing/style="" lacks="" consistency="" with="" many="" errors="" presentation="" proper="" writing.="" professionally="" presented="" properly="" spoken,="" with="" some="" minor="" deficiencies="" mostly="" good,="" but="" some="" structure="" or="" presentation="" problems="" acceptable="" presentation="" poor="" structure,="" careless="" presentation="" melbourne="" polytechnic="" page="" 2="" of=""> 50% excellent very good good satisfactory unsatisfactory analysis logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments consistency logical and convincing mostly consistent and convincing adequate cohesion and conviction argument is confused and disjointed effort/difficulties/ challenges the presented solution demonstrated an extreme degree of difficulty that would require an expert to implement. the presented solution demonstrated a high degree of difficulty that would be an advance professional to implement. the presented solution demonstrated an average degree of difficulty that would be an average professional to implement. the presented solution demonstrated a low degree of difficulty that would be easy to implement. the presented solution demonstrated a poor degree of difficulty that would be too easy to implement. explanation/ justification all elements are present and well integrated. components present with good cohesion components present and mostly well integrated most components present lacks structure. reference style clear styles with excellent source of references. clear referencing/ style generally good referencing/style unclear referencing/style lacks consistency with many errors presentation proper writing. professionally presented properly spoken, with some minor deficiencies mostly good, but some structure or presentation problems acceptable presentation poor structure, careless presentation melbourne polytechnicpage 2 of 4>