BUSI 601. ETHICS, CSR and BUSINESS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSISASSIGNMENT 2. MINI CASE STUDYAN ETHICAL ANALYSIS MIDTERM EXAMDEADLINE: As announced in classDESCRIPTIONChoose your case study from...

1 answer below »
Avoid Grammar mistakes. And avoid plagiarism.


BUSI 601. ETHICS, CSR and BUSINESS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENT 2. MINI CASE STUDY AN ETHICAL ANALYSIS MIDTERM EXAM DEADLINE: As announced in class DESCRIPTION Choose your case study from the list provided by your professor. Analyze it by applying all five approaches in ACU 5 (NOTE: changed to Week 5) and Aia’s Guide. You are an Ethics Officer. Prepare a report addressed to your senior management and provide your recommendations to the manager of the company/organization. You are expected to submit a maximum of 5 pages (double-spaced, 12-pt font, APA style) for this project. 1-2 pages for a draft, 0.5-1 page for feedback, and 1-2 pages for your final report. You can use 1 extra page for recommendations. It should be in one document in PDF format. EXECUTION 1. Read your case study carefully and consider which five approaches you could apply. 2. Analyze by applying those five approaches through your own perspective as an Ethics Officer of the company in the case. 3. Draft your analysis and share it with the assigned classmate/peer for feedback. 4. Review the feedback and improve your draft and write up the final report. 5. Upload ALL your work (the draft, feedback with the name of your peer and final report) in ONE document through the link on your MyUCW portal before the deadline. NOTE: Assignments submitted by email will NOT be accepted. Mining Data Jack Hall, a software developer for a large online retailer, was growing increasingly uncomfortable with his company’s practices. While some of his company’s executives had been publicly critical of the government collecting vast quantities of personal detail from email and online activity, the company was particularly aggressive about mining data from its own customers’ online activity for marketing purposes. Jack talked with one of his friends, who worked for a local university, about his concerns. The friend asked him three questions: 1. With whom does Jack have an ethical conflict – his company, or governmental policy, which permits what the company is doing? 2. Is having an ethical conflict with your employer a sign that Jack should leave the company? 3. What options are available to Jack and what should he do? (Case prepared by Kirk O. Hanson, Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, Santa Clara University, USA) On-time Delivery Sanjay works for the maker of a high-end battery that is favored by many electronics manufacturers. Two weeks ago one of their high volume- but also high maintenance – clients placed a larger order with Sanjay for these batteries. Sanjay promised four-week delivery, as that is what he was told by manufacturing. The client called today, saying he just wanted to confirm the batteries would be delivered on time, as he would have to shut down his assembly line if they were late. Sanjay knows, due to shortages elsewhere in the supply chain, that there is a 50/50 chance the batteries will now be late. He is sure the client would go ballistic if he knew, cancelling the order, even though Sanjay still hopes the deadline will be met. He is thinking of just saying “everything is on track” until he has more specific information that the shipment will be late. Is that the right thing to do? If not, what should he do? (Case prepared by Kirk O. Hanson, Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, Santa Clara University, USA) Rumors A few months ago, Arielle Cruz, Head of the Sales and Marketing Department of Mariposa Real Estate, formally announced to her staff that she will be leaving the company in order to be able to concentrate on her family. She emphasized that since she will be leaving, there is room for a promotion and that she would nominate their two top performers, Mary and Jane, to the HRMD. In an effort to give herself an upper hand, Mary closes deals with three big clients two days right after Arielle’s announcement. Two weeks after Arielle’s announcement, stories about Mary’s promiscuity begin to make their rounds and quickly become the mainstay headlines of office gossip. The most scandalous rumor is that Mary offers sexual services to her clients – both male and female – in order to close her sales. In the face of all these rumors, Mary continues to deliver excellent work. The time has come to promote of the candidates. Based on performance, Mary is the better candidate but both could do the job. Should you consider the rumors? What should you do? (Case prepared by Gov. Jose B. Fernandez Jr. Ethics Center, Ateneo de Manila Univ., Philippines)
Answered Same DayNov 17, 2022

Answer To: BUSI 601. ETHICS, CSR and BUSINESS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSISASSIGNMENT 2. MINI CASE STUDYAN ETHICAL...

Banasree answered on Nov 18 2022
38 Votes
2
Mining Data
1. In following the case study Jack’s ethical conflict with the Company. Either a person conduct himself ethically or unethically when confronted with
an ethical dilemma which can be influence by many things. Like
a. Peron methods of moral consideration.
b. Impacting variables which involves person’s characteristic, organization structural, company’s culture and the gravity of the ethical issues.
c. When an organization has a lack of robust moral senses which intends to do many wrong things especially if they are controls by the rule, policies, role or strong cultural definition that censure of mentioned behaviors.
2. Many research evident that Jack’s scenarios having three stages:
a. Preconventional level – Jack’s availed sign’s between right and wrong is depended on his challenges from external sources like acknowledgement, ethical culture etc.
b. Conventional Level – Most of the ethical decisions are based on maintaining preset standards and coping up with the environmental expectations.
c. Principled level – Jack’s defined moral values in view of the company’s doing which related to the society’s basic data privacy.
Therefore, Jack has to analyze his available options before any conclusion.
3. Jack’s option’s:
a. He has to assess his liberty with company and the effective acknowledgement of the right available option.
b. He has to reevaluate all type of forced and compulsion.
c. He needs to approach the company for eliminate the discrimination in regards to data mining and ethical dilemma.
On time delivery
Sanjay as owner of the company he must ensure the code of ethics in terms of on time delivery....
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here