Begin by identifying an organizational problem within your own workplace healthcare setting or a hypothetical healthcare organization. If you choose a problem in your workplace, be sure to utilize data from that healthcare organization; if you have created a hypothetical healthcare organization, you may use a public domain database with instructor permission. As this is a scholarly initiative, this assignment must adhere to all APA requirements and formatting, and include peer-reviewed and evidence-based sources to support any and all claims. As you develop this first part of the assignment, consider the following prompts to formulate your paper.
I. What Is the Organizational Problem?
A. Provide a contextual basis for the organizational problem that you have chosen. How does this problem fail to meet quality or other regulatory requirements?
B. Articulate organizational challenges posed by the problem (e.g., interdepartmental conflicts, communication failure, budgeting issues).
II. Evidence-Based Support
A. Provide data that supports the existence of the problem. You may utilize public sources to find data related to your selected problem.
B. How has this problem been addressed in the past? What information management systems or patient care technologies have been utilized when addressing this problem? Be sure to use peer-reviewed literature to support your answer.
C. Discuss relevant accreditation standards, safety standards, compliance standards, and quality initiatives. How do these standards promote a culture of safety within the department? Be sure to cite the appropriate standards within your answer.
Guidelines for Submission: This paper should be one to two pages in length, not including the cover page or reference page. Use APA format for the reference list and all internal citations. Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (80%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value Problem: Provide Meets “Proficient” criteria and includes insightful detail into the contextual basis of the organizational problem Comprehensively provides a contextual basis for the organizational problem that was chosen, including how the problem fails to meet quality or regulatory requirements Provides a contextual basis for the organizational problem that was chosen but with gaps in detail or logic Does not provide a contextual basis for the organizational problem that was chosen 18 Problem: Articulate Meets “Proficient” criteria and offers greater depth of information regarding the organizational challenges posed by the problem Clearly articulates organizational challenges posed by the problem Articulates organizational challenges posed by the problem but articulation is not clear Does not articulate organizational challenges posed by the problem 18 Support: Provide Meets “Proficient” criteria and data provided demonstrates nuanced understanding of the problem Provides data that supports the existence of the problem Provides data but data does not fully support existence of the problem Does not provide data or data provided does not support existence of the problem 18 Support: Addressed Meets “Proficient” criteria and description includes insightful detail regarding how this problem has been addressed in the past Thoroughly describes how this problem has been addressed in the past, including the information management systems or patient care technologies utilized, and supports answer with peer-reviewed literature Describes how this problem has been addressed in the past, but with gaps in detail, and supports answer but support does not include peer-reviewed literature or is irrelevant Does not describe how the problem has been addressed in the past or does not support answer 18 Support: Discuss Meets “Proficient” criteria and offers professional insights concerning how accreditation, safety, compliance, and quality standards promote a culture of safety Clearly discusses relevant accreditation, safety, and compliance standards, as well as quality initiatives, including how these standards promote a culture of safety within the department, and cites appropriate standards Discusses accreditation, safety, and compliance standards, as well as quality initiatives, but with gaps in detail or clarity, and cites standards but citations are irrelevant or inappropriate Does not discuss accreditation, safety, compliance, and quality standards and does not cite standards 18 Articulation of Response Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, and syntax and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that prevent understanding of ideas 10
Earned Total 100%