BMG732 Advanced Operations Management – Assignment Brief – Assignment 2: Professional Report 1 BMG732 ADVANCED OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT ASSIGNMENT BRIEF ASSIGNMENT 2: PROFESSIONAL REPORT ASSIGNMENT...

1 answer below »
i will give


BMG732 Advanced Operations Management – Assignment Brief – Assignment 2: Professional Report 1 BMG732 ADVANCED OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT ASSIGNMENT BRIEF ASSIGNMENT 2: PROFESSIONAL REPORT ASSIGNMENT DETAILS Due: 9am Wednesday 29th May 2019 Weighting: 60% Requirement: You are required to construct an inductive professional report. The development of an inductive report is a strongly applied piece of work and must link theory and practice. You are to: 1. Pick a New Zealand company or organisation. The exact company you choose is up to you, but it must be one for which you can find an adequate amount of secondary data. 2. Undertake a strategic operations analysis of the company to determine the current situation. 3. From your analysis, make conclusions and develop recommendations for the company to provide direction about how it should proceed in the future. Your report must:  Be from the operations management perspective, reflecting key concepts and frameworks we have considered in our readings and discussions (i.e. not be a marketing or accounting report)  Be realistic and functional  Use theory and practice to demonstrate knowledge The report must demonstrate comprehension of the whole strategic operations management topic. Therefore, whatever you choose you must make reference to strategic operations management models, frameworks, concepts and terminology that you have encountered in workshops and self-learning, and from directed material and independent research. This must be combined with industry material and data to provide sound argument, rationale, and decisions, ultimately leading to useful recommendations that your report will produce. Length: 4,000 words (approximately 8 pages), plus references list Learning outcome(s) addressed: 1. Develop and apply operations strategy for a range of organisations. 3. Identify the key components of an effective operations strategy. 4. Formulate operations strategies for a range of small and medium businesses. Refer: Appendix 1. Professional report marking schedule Appendix 2. Critical reading Learning guide – Reports (on NMIT Moodle) BMG732 Advanced Operations Management – Assignment Brief – Assignment 2: Professional Report 2 APPENDIX 1. PROFESSIONAL REPORT MARKING SCHEDULE Name: Section Marking Criteria Mark Title  Well-chosen subject Executive summary  A useful summary of the entire report  Covers the essence of the aims, objectives, findings and main recommendations. Introduction /10  Provides an overview of the subject matter of the report  Establishes the context of the report  Includes a statement about the change, problem or issue that needs investigating  Terms of reference or scope of the report  Defines the objectives of the report  Sets readers expectations  States any limitations or assumptions Discussion /50  Analyses the situation using theoretical and practical concepts  Uses evidence to back claims  Is logical and creates sound argument  Major topics identified  Develops the main issues/themes Conclusions /10  Summarises the key findings – the key issues or problems in the situation  Grounded in the present situation  Listed as numbered points in order of importance  Relate directly to the objectives of the report Recommendations /5  Details the course of action that should be followed  Recommendations flow from findings  Action oriented & focus on the future  Are specific, realistic and achievable Presentation /10  Clear communication  Sound structure  Format, layout and spelling  Uses appendices to supplement discussion  In own language (i.e., >90% paraphrased & <10% quotes). research /15  relevant information  sources referenced correctly, by apa format  broad and deep consultation of reference material  valid information drawn from a number of reputable sources  referencing, in-text and listed by apa format total marks (%) 100.00 bmg732 advanced operations management – assignment brief – assignment 2: professional report 3 grade criteria a-/a-a+ (outstanding /excellent)  a comprehensive exploration of the topic, with sound critical comment and a clear synthesis of the issues. original and/or scholarly content and depth of conceptual and theoretical analysis.  a lucid and logically structured argument with systematic and critical evaluation of the main points.  detailed support from literature with references appropriately integrated.  high quality sources identified, interpreted and evaluated  virtually flawless presentation. clear, concise and logically presented argument and/or discussion. b/b+ (very good)  a systematic exploration of the assignment topic which may include some critical comment and appraisal. substantive content.  clear introduction, conclusion and thematic sequence, with main points elaborated.  regular support provided from the literature. use of quotes where appropriate, with some interpretive comment.  clear expression, well-constructed sentences and paragraphs with feresentation flaw s. c+/b- (competent)  a reasonably balanced summary of the issues as reflected in course study materials. adequate content but lacking theoretical depth.  clear introduction, with some organization of main points but lacking clear links and/or thematic sequence  the text of the assignment shows that the course materials have been read and acknowledged. an accurate bibliography is attached  most presentation details met e.g. spacing, fonts, margin, legibility, citations, grammar, and spelling. c (acceptable)  assignment requirements/topic not fully covered. material is insufficiently elaborated.  overuse of quotations with little explanation. acceptable but flawed content  adequate introduction, with structure barely discernible and/or somewhat confused and some major points missed.  reference material is not well integrated into text of the assignment. little evidence that quality of sources has been considered.  limited acknowledgement and light bibliography  minor presentation flaws. d (flawed)  unacceptable and flawed content, unreflective personal comment, incoherent argument  structure very confused, not discernible, not explained.  little or no evidence of critical reading in the text of the assignment  inadequate acknowledgements and/or bibliography  major presentation flaws. quotes).="" research="" 15="" ="" relevant="" information="" ="" sources="" referenced="" correctly,="" by="" apa="" format="" ="" broad="" and="" deep="" consultation="" of="" reference="" material="" ="" valid="" information="" drawn="" from="" a="" number="" of="" reputable="" sources="" ="" referencing,="" in-text="" and="" listed="" by="" apa="" format="" total="" marks="" (%)="" 100.00="" bmg732="" advanced="" operations="" management="" –="" assignment="" brief="" –="" assignment="" 2:="" professional="" report="" 3="" grade="" criteria="" a-/a-a+="" (outstanding="" excellent)="" ="" a="" comprehensive="" exploration="" of="" the="" topic,="" with="" sound="" critical="" comment="" and="" a="" clear="" synthesis="" of="" the="" issues.="" original="" and/or="" scholarly="" content="" and="" depth="" of="" conceptual="" and="" theoretical="" analysis.="" ="" a="" lucid="" and="" logically="" structured="" argument="" with="" systematic="" and="" critical="" evaluation="" of="" the="" main="" points.="" ="" detailed="" support="" from="" literature="" with="" references="" appropriately="" integrated.="" ="" high="" quality="" sources="" identified,="" interpreted="" and="" evaluated="" ="" virtually="" flawless="" presentation.="" clear,="" concise="" and="" logically="" presented="" argument="" and/or="" discussion.="" b/b+="" (very="" good)="" ="" a="" systematic="" exploration="" of="" the="" assignment="" topic="" which="" may="" include="" some="" critical="" comment="" and="" appraisal.="" substantive="" content.="" ="" clear="" introduction,="" conclusion="" and="" thematic="" sequence,="" with="" main="" points="" elaborated.="" ="" regular="" support="" provided="" from="" the="" literature.="" use="" of="" quotes="" where="" appropriate,="" with="" some="" interpretive="" comment.="" ="" clear="" expression,="" well-constructed="" sentences="" and="" paragraphs="" with="" feresentation="" flaw="" s.="" c+/b-="" (competent)="" ="" a="" reasonably="" balanced="" summary="" of="" the="" issues="" as="" reflected="" in="" course="" study="" materials.="" adequate="" content="" but="" lacking="" theoretical="" depth.="" ="" clear="" introduction,="" with="" some="" organization="" of="" main="" points="" but="" lacking="" clear="" links="" and/or="" thematic="" sequence="" ="" the="" text="" of="" the="" assignment="" shows="" that="" the="" course="" materials="" have="" been="" read="" and="" acknowledged.="" an="" accurate="" bibliography="" is="" attached="" ="" most="" presentation="" details="" met="" e.g.="" spacing,="" fonts,="" margin,="" legibility,="" citations,="" grammar,="" and="" spelling.="" c="" (acceptable)="" ="" assignment="" requirements/topic="" not="" fully="" covered.="" material="" is="" insufficiently="" elaborated.="" ="" overuse="" of="" quotations="" with="" little="" explanation.="" acceptable="" but="" flawed="" content="" ="" adequate="" introduction,="" with="" structure="" barely="" discernible="" and/or="" somewhat="" confused="" and="" some="" major="" points="" missed.="" ="" reference="" material="" is="" not="" well="" integrated="" into="" text="" of="" the="" assignment.="" little="" evidence="" that="" quality="" of="" sources="" has="" been="" considered.="" ="" limited="" acknowledgement="" and="" light="" bibliography="" ="" minor="" presentation="" flaws.="" d="" (flawed)="" ="" unacceptable="" and="" flawed="" content,="" unreflective="" personal="" comment,="" incoherent="" argument="" ="" structure="" very="" confused,="" not="" discernible,="" not="" explained.="" ="" little="" or="" no="" evidence="" of="" critical="" reading="" in="" the="" text="" of="" the="" assignment="" ="" inadequate="" acknowledgements="" and/or="" bibliography="" ="" major="" presentation="">
Answered Same DayMay 10, 2021BMG732Nelson Marlborough Institute of Technology

Answer To: BMG732 Advanced Operations Management – Assignment Brief – Assignment 2: Professional Report 1...

Akansha answered on May 15 2021
134 Votes
Bozhko, A., Pogozhev, O., & Меlnikov, А. (2018). Ways to manage elements of fisheries management systems and fisheries management processes. VESTNIK OF ASTRAKHAN STATE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY. SERIES: FISHING INDUSTRY, (1), 84-89. doi: 10.24143/2073-5529-2018-1-84-89
This reference ha
s been cited to explain the ecological balance and sustainability that the fisheries management causes. It also explains the FPIs, types of data and analytics and various management strategies.
D, N., & Chinnamma, M. (2017). Fishing Industry Waste Water Treatment by Polyelectrolytes. International Journal Of Advanced Engineering, Management And Science, 3(4), 374-377. doi: 10.24001/ijaems.3.4.16
I have used this reference I context to the disturbance created due to use of heavy metal ions and ways to treat it. These ions destroy the aquatic environment and advance tools and techniques of fisheries management help resolve them.
DE ALESSI, M. (2012). The Political Economy of Fishing Rights and Claims: The Maori Experience in New Zealand. Journal Of Agrarian Change, 12(2-3), 390-412. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2011.00346.x
The reference details the entry of capitalists in New Zealand in the 21st century and its impact on getting legal access for fishing. It also exhibits the company’s partnership with the Aoteroa Fisheries and Moana Pacific.
Dixon, R., & McGregor, A. (2011). Grassroots Development and Upwards Accountabilities: Tensions in the Reconstruction of Aceh's Fishing Industry. Development And Change, 42(6), 1349-1377. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01739.x
This reference doesn’t have a direct link with the company, but displays information on fishing industry from a similar source. It also explores the grassroot development goal in the post disaster fisheries in Indonesia.
Edwin, M., Moore, D., & Guard, D. (2019). Dehydration in New Zealand fishing vessel crews. Safety Science, 117, 314-319. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.04.019
I have used this reference to show the levels of dehydration which is a common phenomenon in New Zealand fishing. It also provides methods that the company’s uses for healthy and safe extraction of fishes from the vessels.
Francis, R., & Sagar, P. (2012). Modelling the effect of fishing on southern Buller's albatross using a 60-year dataset. New Zealand Journal Of Zoology, 39(1), 3-17. doi: 10.1080/03014223.2011.600766
I have used this reference to describe the effect of fishing on Albatross. It also helps in estimating various parameters demographically. It also explains the analysis of various data, how to capture observations. It also highlights the decrease in death of the fish population.
GENG, X., & LI, Z. (2017). Study on Fishing Tools and Methods of Fishing in the East China Sea—A Case Study of Fishing Tools and Fishing Methods in Zhejiang Fishing Ground. Destech...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here