BUGEN 5930 Business, Society and the Planet Assessment 2 This task requires you to work both individually and as part of a group to consider the Corporate Social Responsibility performance and stated...

1 answer below »
Ethical dilemma


BUGEN 5930 Business, Society and the Planet Assessment 2 This task requires you to work both individually and as part of a group to consider the Corporate Social Responsibility performance and stated values of two similar organisations and apply the Giving Voice to Values framework. There are two parts to this task: · Part A – 25% Business Values Assessment Report · Part B – 20% Application of the GVV framework – scenario development, script development and online presentation Please see below for the details of these Task Requirements. Part A – Business Values Assessment report This activity is based on the exercise on page 226 of ‘Business Ethics’ (Crane & Matten, 2010) – a copy of the relevant pages are available on the course Moodle page. For this component, you need to work in a group of three to four (3-4) students to consider the values and social performance of two companies. You are required to consider and discuss the companies as a group, but must submit your responses to the questions as individuals. 1. As a group, select two companies that produce social reports and whose values are identified on their websites or in other company documents (that are publicly available). The two companies selected by your group must be either: (a) From different industries but in the same country; or (b) From the same industry but different countries. By Week 5, your group must provide the names of the companies you have selected to research, and the industry and country within which they operate. 2. As a group, research each of your companies to determine their company values, their approaches to social responsibility and their reporting of their social performances. 3. As an individual, you are required to submit responses to the following questions: i. Identify and describe the two companies you have researched; their core business activities and the countries and/or industries in which they operate. (15 marks) ii. What differences are evident between the two companies in terms of the range of issues dealt with in their social reports and the depth of coverage on specific issues? Please note – this question does not ask for a description or summary of the content of each company’s reports. Instead, you need to analyse the types of information, the major themes, the presentation, formatting and tone of each report – and explain the ways in which the reports are similar to each other and the ways in which they are different. (15 marks) iii. Discuss which of the Sustainable Development Goals you believe are most relevant to these companies, their industries and the countries in which they operate. Discuss the extent to which these SDGs were addressed, explicitly or implicitly, in the CSR/Sustainability reports of your companies? (15 marks) iv. Assess the apparent quality of the social accounting approach utilized by each company according to Zadek et al.’s (1997) criteria. (15 marks) v. Discuss the extent to which the social reports provided by these companies reflect their stated values. (15 marks) vi. Briefly reflect on your groups’ discussions of these companies. In what ways did the ideas presented by your group confirm your own conclusions, influence your thinking and/or present another perspective to you? (15 marks) · A score (10 marks) will be allocated for presentation, written expression, spelling, grammar, punctuation and referencing. Word limit: 2000 words Referencing: You are required to follow the APA style of referencing for this task. There is no set number of references required. It is recommended, however, that you independently seek out resources in addition to those provided by the lecturer. Due Date Week 8 Students are required to upload their assignment as a Word doc or PDF (with the FedUni Business School – Assignment Coversheet attached) via the relevant Turnitin link on the course Moodle page, as well as the regular link for assignment submission. Marking Guide Name Responses to questions % Grade Qi - describe the two companies that have been researched. Responses should: · clearly identify and describe the two companies being researched · clearly describe the industries and countries in which these companies operate · Clearly describe any social reporting/performance issues that may be relevant for these companies. 15% Qii - What differences are evident between the two companies in terms of the range of social, environmental and economic issues dealt with in their reports and the depth of coverage on specific issues? Responses should: · compare the style, content and presentation of the social reports provided by each company · critically analyse the strengths and weaknesses of the approaches to social reporting evident in the reports · comment on the range of issues covered and the depth of the coverage 15% Qiii - Discuss which of the Sustainable Development Goals you believe are most relevant to these companies, their industries and the countries in which they operate. Discuss the extent to which these SDGs were addressed, explicitly or implicitly, in the CSR/Sustainability reports of your companies: · Demonstrate critical thinking and analysis to identify key SDGs and explain why these are particularly relevant to each company · Describe the extent to which these SDGs have been addressed (explicitly or implicitly) and the effectiveness of this reporting 15% Qiv- Assess the apparent quality of the social accounting approach utilized by each company according to Zadek et al.’s (1997) criteria. Responses should: · Provide some brief commentary on the extent to which each of the companies does or does not meet the eight criteria identified by Zadek et al (1997) as the key principles of quality of social reporting, as outlined on P. 216 (Crane & Matten, 2010). · Identify which key principles are met (and how they are met) by each company’s social reporting · Identify which principles have not been met 15% Qv - Discuss the extent to which the social reports reflect the values of your selected companies. Responses should: · Identify each company’s values (including their Mission Statement, Values, Business Principles etc.) as stated on their websites, reports or in other company documentation · Critically analyse each company’s social reports in terms of the extent to which their stated values align (or do not align) with their approaches to social responsibility and sustainability (based on the evidence in the reports) 15% Qvi - Briefly reflect on your groups’ discussions of these companies. In what ways did the ideas presented by your group confirm your own conclusions or present another perspective to you? Responses should: · Reflect on the group discussions about the social reporting of the two companies selected · Identify key points of agreement and disagreement with other group members · Discuss how the different perspectives provided by group members contributed to your own consideration of the performance of these companies 15% Presentation (expression, structure, referencing, organisation, word count – not including cover sheet and references etc.) 10% Total 100% Comments: Part B – Application of GVV Framework In this task requires you to consider an ethical dilemma that emerges at a workplace of your choosing. This workplace may be based on one of the companies analysed in Assessment 2 – Part A, another workplace or company with which you are familiar or a fictional workplace developed by your group. As a group, you are required to: 1. Write a fictional scenario that describes the emergence an ethical/moral dilemma for stakeholders in a workplace of your choosing; 2. Develop a script in which the central character in this scenario applies the Giving Voice to Values framework to the give voice to his/her values; 3. Present your script to the class as a role play. _________________________________________________________________________ 1. Scenario Development Develop a fictional scenario that outlines the emergence of an ethical dilemma in a workplace of your choosing. This scenario should be written as a narrative piece of writing, similar in format and style to the GVV/Babson scenarios. Your scenario should describe a possible workplace situation that illustrates the emergence of this dilemma as a values conflict for one or more people. It should introduce the key stakeholders & characters, the key facts and the background information that has led to this issue. Please discuss your scenario/workplace/ethical dilemma with your lecturer to ensure it is suitable for this task before you proceed with the development of your script. Scenario – 25 marks (800 words) Due date – Week 11 PLEASE NOTE: The scenario and script are not the same thing. The scenario introduces the key people, background and outlines the ethical dilemma. The scenario ends with the ethical dilemma – that is, the central character identifies the dilemma but is not sure on what to do about it. The script starts with the ethical dilemma, demonstrates how the central character applies the GVV framework to address the ethical dilemma to achieve a more ethical outcome for the stakeholders. 2. Script Development Your group is required to develop a script in which the central character in your scenario applies the Giving Voice to Values framework in response to the values conflict or ethical dilemma identified in your scenario. Your script should include evidence that you have addressed the following questions: · What is the ethical dilemma/values conflict presented in your scenario? · Who are the stakeholders and what is at stake for the key parties (including those who disagree with you)? · What are the main arguments you are trying to counter? That is, what are the reasons and rationalizations you need to address? · What levers/arguments could you use to counter the reasons and rationalisations, to influence those with whom you disagree? · What is your most powerful and persuasive response to the reasons and rationalizations you need to address? To whom should the arguments be made? When and in what context? Script – 50 marks (1500 words) Due date – Week 11 3. Script Presentation to Class Your group then needs to present this script to the class as a group role play. The presentation of the script should be clear and enable the audience to engage with the issues. All group members must be meaningfully included. Creativity and expression is encouraged. Script Presentation to Class – 25 marks (7-10 min. in length) Due date – Week 11 The group will discuss and debrief their scenario to clarify and gain class feedback. Groups are then required to nominate one group member to upload both the group’s Scenario and Script as a Word doc or PDF (with the FedUni Business School – Assignment Coversheet attached) via the relevant Turnitin submission links on the course Moodle page. Please ensure that the names and student I.D. numbers of each group member is listed on the Assignment Coversheet. PLEASE NOTE - IMPORTANT: It is a requirement of this task that students commit to working collaboratively together to develop the three components of this task, with an equal and even contribution from each group member. If, for whatever reasons, a student is unable to provide the required commitment and/or contribution to their group’s progress and completion of
Answered Same DayJan 21, 2021BUGEN5930

Answer To: BUGEN 5930 Business, Society and the Planet Assessment 2 This task requires you to work both...

Akansha answered on Jan 23 2021
120 Votes
Application of GVV Framework        1
Name of the student:
Name of the Institution:
Roll No:
Date of Submission:
Scenario Development
Organization ABC is one of the largest software companies in the world. They have been continuously developing operating systems, search engines and various software for over 20 years. They have recently forayed into developing smart accessories, mobile phones, tablets etc, and have decid
ed to expand into the food and hospitality business in order to become a conglomerate. The head offices are based in the Silicon Valley in the US, but the organization has employees and branches in most major cities in the world. It is a male-dominated organization, and the head office consist of white, heterosexual men. Even though it is a large organization, they do not have clear harassment and discrimination strategies.
Most employees in the organization find that it is an extremely good organization to work for, since the hours are good and the pay for the employees has bee rising. In order to keep the employees happy, they are also offered many perks alongside their salaries. The organization has only hired the best of the best, which means that most of their employees come to colleges and universities from all over the world. Most of the employees from US have graduated from MIT or an Ivy league College, which is why they are kept happy at all costs.
There has been investment in the company from many MIT alumni, and they have thus become major stakeholders in the company, by virtue of being shareholders. Another large shareholder of the company would be the original employees, who had been paid in shares for the starting of the year (Arse & Gentile, 2015). The current CEO, CFO and COO of the organisation are the founders and owners of the organization, and they and their partners hold the largest percentage of shares and mainly comprise of the board of directors.
The CEO of the organization has however, decided to retire in a few months, and they have been searching for an internal replacement. This is a large issue for the organization, since the current CEO is, as mentioned, one of the founders and has been in the organization for 20 years.
There is an employee at the organization, Rose Parker, who has discovered that she is pregnant. She is a minority candidate, as she is African-American and a homosexual candidate. She has been working in the organization for 20 years, and is one of the first employees in the organization. The CEO of the organization, who was the main owner and starter ABC, has recently decided to retire, and after years of hard work, she has been recommended for the post of the CEO. There are many pregnant employees such as Rose in the organization. However, since it is in the software field. And it is dominated by men, the CEO and board of directors face an ethical dilemma in hiring Rose. She has been proven to be capable of the job. However, she will need to take time off towards the end and during the first months after the pregnancy. Since she is an African-American, homosexual and female candidate, the board does not think that she would be the right candidate for the job. They are thus in an ethical dilemma of whether they should hire her, despite the fact that she is pregnant (Chappell, & Bowes-Sperry, 2015). There has been an immense amount of stress over the months in order to find someone as efficient as her. However, the board of directors has not found anyone who works in the organization with the same skill-set and experience as Rose (Plump, 2018).
The board of directors have understood that it would be a public relations nightmare in this case, if Rose is not hired immediately for the job. If the organization hires someone is from outside, then they might not be able to lead the company as efficiently, since the way the company works and runs is extremely unique. Most members of the board of directors are conflicted, since they are white, heterosexual men who have gained seats on the board of directors because of their investments into the company. The CEO of the organization, along with the CFO and COO are in agreement that Rose is the best candidate for the job, and thus, need her to be...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here