Class:Multidisciplinary Practice and Case Analysis for Doctoral Learners.Comprehensive Analysis of...

Question

Class:Multidisciplinary Practice and Case Analysis for Doctoral Learners.

Comprehensive Analysis of Case Study

In this assignment, you will compile your previous assignments, which you will revise to incorporate new insights as well as feedback from your instructor. In addition, you will assess your strengths and weaknesses as a human services leader based on your course readings. Finally, you will create a professional development plan for yourself. Prior to doing so, review the course project description to ensure that you meet each requirement. Refer to the helpful Campus links in Resources as needed.

Requirements

Font:Use 12-point Times or Times New Roman, double-spaced type.

3/10/2020 Comprehensive Analysis of Case Study Scoring Guide file:///Users/grisselvelez/Desktop/Comprehensive Analysis of Case Study Scoring Guide.htm 1/2 Comprehensive Analysis of Case Study Scoring Guide Due Date: End of Unit 9 Percentage of Course Grade: 20%. CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED Summarize analysis and recommendations for a practice situation. 16% Does not summarize analysis and recommendations for a practice situation. Incompletely summarizes analysis and recommendations for a practice situation. Summarizes analysis and recommendations for a practice situation. Summarizes analysis and recommendations for a practice situation, comparing pros and cons of potential solutions. Analyze the qualities of a good leader in the human services field. 17% Does not analyze the qualities of a good leader in the human services field. Identifies the qualities of a good leader in the human services field. Analyzes the qualities of a good leader in the human services field. Analyzes the qualities of a good leader in the human services field, including suggested criteria for evaluating these qualities in individuals. Analyze the importance of collaboration in human services delivery and ways to handle conflict in collaborative groups. 17% Does not analyze the importance of collaboration in human services delivery and ways to handle conflict in collaborative groups. Describes the importance of collaboration in human services delivery. Analyzes the importance of collaboration in human services delivery and ways to handle conflict in collaborative groups. Analyzes the importance of collaboration in human services delivery and ways to handle conflict in collaborative groups, providing real-world examples. Evaluate the role of ethics and diversity in human services, including the role of the practitioner in supporting ethical standards and diversity. 17% Does not evaluate the role of ethics and diversity in human services, including the role of the practitioner in supporting ethical standards and diversity. Describes the role of ethics and diversity in human services. Evaluates the role of ethics and diversity in human services, including the role of the practitioner in supporting ethical standards and diversity. Evaluates the role of ethics and diversity in human services, including the role of the practitioner in supporting ethical standards and diversity and suggesting criteria for evaluating practitioner effectiveness. Assess personal strengths and development needs in regard to human services leadership, including a plan for professional development. 17% Does not assess personal strengths and development needs in regard to human services leadership, including a plan for professional development. Assesses personal strengths and development needs in regard to human services leadership but does not include a plan for professional development. Assesses personal strengths and development needs in regard to human services leadership, including a plan for professional development. Assesses personal strengths and development needs in regard to human services leadership, including a plan for professional development and specific resources to be used. 3/10/2020 Comprehensive Analysis of Case Study Scoring Guide file:///Users/grisselvelez/Desktop/Comprehensive Analysis of Case Study Scoring Guide.htm 2/2 CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others consistent with the expectations for human services professionals. 16% Does not communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others consistent with expectations for human services professionals. Inconsistently communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others. Falls short of meeting the expectations for human services professionals. Communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others consistent with the expectations for human services professionals. Clearly, consistently and concisely communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others consistent with expectations for human services professionals.

comprehensive-analysis-of-case-study-scoring-guide-sq4rr42m.pdf team-functioning-and-conflict-scoring-guide-gimfuwee.pdf ethics-and-diversity-in-human-services-scoring-guide-odbhbzeh.pdf

Abhishek · Accepted Answer

Running Head: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN	1
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 		12
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Table of Contents
Introduction	3
Explaining Strengths and Weaknesses as per the Self-SWOT	3
Analysing Opportunities and Threats as per the Self-SWOT	3
Skill Gaps	5
Professional Development Plan	5
Aims	5
Objectives	6
The Plan	6
Explaining the Plan	8
Recommendations	10
Conclusion	10
Feedbacks left to be given to	11
Unit 1 Discussion 1- Learning from the past	11
Unit 5 Discussion 1	11
Unit 8 Discussion 1	11
Unit 9 Discussion 1	11
References	12
Introduction 
	This project tries to throw light on the strengths and the weakness of the individual to become efficient in teamwork and leadership skills. To become an efficient leader it is very important for an individual to understand the personal strengths and the weaknesses. The project throws light on the elaborate weakness of the individual and tries to overcome the weakness. The assignment tries to analyse the criteria of the individuals. The assignment tries to bring out the skills gap and it has created a professional development plan as per the set objectives set to improve the abilities of the individuals. 
Explaining Strengths and Weaknesses as per the Self-SWOT
	I have strengths in using telemedicine. Telemedicine refers to the treatment of the patients using the systems of telecommunication. I have strengths in the innovation factors and the communication as well. My perspectives are from the CEO that helps me to foresee the situation. I am good at communication made at multicultural level; I myself belong to the multicultural background. Hence, I can embrace multiculturism very easily, which is why I can also understand clients very easily from various backgrounds. Besides, I have also evaluated myself from my previous assessment that I am an organised, stabilisers and persuaders type of leader.
	My weakness includes the lack of knowledge in technology. Weakness in technology can be a huge drawback for the individuals in this present age. The lack of leadership is also one of major drawbacks for me. To run any business, investment is very much needed. I do not have such a huge amount of investment. To improve in the field, the availability of the counsellors is very important. I do not have enough counsellors. 
Analysing Opportunities and Threats as per the Self-SWOT
	The cultural and the work environment has become an opportunity for me. The environment has helped me to get knowledge about many things. The conducive workplace would help me be mixed up with different colleagues in a better way. The loyalties and the values would act as an opportunity for me. 
	The biggest threat for me is the current competition. The competition in the market makes it difficult to stand out in the market. There are many companies in the market that provide the same services to the customers. It is also a huge threat to individual growth. Another huge threat is the vulnerability to the hackers. The online leakage of the privacy has risked the personal and the confidential information of the individual.
Figure 1: Self-SWOT
(Source: Learner)
Skill Gaps
The first skill gap is that I lack in understanding the cultural aspects of the people. In team members, there will be people from various cultural backgrounds; therefore, it is very important for me to understand the cultural background of the team members. Another skill gap is the gap of motivation. Motivation is very much important for teamwork. Therefore, my motivation needs to be increased. Without proper motivation, the teamwork cannot function properly. 
Another skill that I believe I need to address is the adoption of collaborative work psyche that is very much needed in human services delivery. As is seen in case of Riverbend City Task Force, the external manager always gave me scope, where I can handle conflicts amongst collaborative groups by showing conflict behavioural managing style, while providing support to the LGBT clients. Hence, in Ruby Lake Teen Homelessness Task Force as well, I will have to meet these gaps so that collaborative working can be facilitated. 
Not only that, but also the issue of LGBT client management is quite a sensitive one, which needs to be handled maturely and empathetically (Watson & Hoefer, 2013).

Class:Multidisciplinary Practice and Case Analysis for Doctoral Learners. Comprehensive Analysis of Case Study In this assignment, you will compile your previous assignments, which you will revise to...