COPY AND PASTE YOUR ASSIGNMENT HERE
Write a 3000-word essay on your personal experience: Reflective Writing Assignment Write an essay of 3000 words on an incident during your work in clinical setting or during a classroom learning. Write your personal views of what you are learning in relation to the scenario. Compare and make links between what you encounter and what you learn from the incident. The write up should reflect evaluation of your own beliefs, assumptions and values and how they are changing through your learning experience. Listed below are topics or scenarios (Choose any one) · A practical learning experience in dialysis unit, such as: · A clinical incident - Medication error INFORMATION ON YOUR ESSAY CONTENT: Aim: The aim of this essay is to focus on the student’s ability to critique their own practice and reflect on internal and external impacts. Writing Structure Good reflective writing is not about pure description or listing information. Good reflective writing presents the full story: it captures the essential aspects of a particular event or topic through the 5 W questions: who, what, where, when and why, countered by how. Real reflective practice invites you examine your feelings towards your learning as it happens. It requires confidence and honesty in sharing your experiences and expectations. It means acknowledging your successes as well as your failures, and identifying what you might do differently in future. Reflective writing is one of the rare forms of academic writing that allows you to write in first person — it is all about YOU and YOUR experiences. It is considered a more informal style of academic writing, but may still require formal language and references to relevant texts. The structure of your reflective assignment may be in the form of an essay, or more of a journal style. As with any assignment, you should make sure your reflective writing flows logically, and explores each point in full before moving onto the next one CONTENT FOR REFLECTIVE WRITING: Follow one Model of reflective practice Gibbs Model of Reflective Practice Description: What happened? Feelings and thoughts: What were you thinking and feeling before, during and after the event? Evaluation: What was good and bad about the experience? Analysis: What explanations might there be for the situation? Why did it happen the way it happened? Conclusion: What have you learnt? Action Plan: In a similar situation in the future, what would you do? · Please write essay based on Gibbs Model of Reflective Practice · Medication Error in Dialysis Unit · References (Harvard Style)-25 to 30 · 3000 words · PRESENTATION AND STRUCTURE 10% UNDERSTANDING AND USE OF KNOWLEDGE 40% CRITICAL ANALYSIS 30% REFLECTION AND RECOMMENDATION 20% Mark awarded 9 36 27 18 90-100 MASTERY / OUTSTANDING WORK Meets assessment criteria within word limit Outstanding presentation. Correctly referenced. Satisfactorily maintains confidentiality of persons and location Demonstrates superior understanding of the subject. Breadth and depth of reading is evident. Analysis and synthesis substantially demonstrated in reasoned, insightful opinions. Originality is evident in the inter-relationship between theory and practice. Debates different forms of evidence to critically analyse the issues. Evidence of reflection, independent thinking, problem solving and decision making. Produces clear recommendations and/or new perspectives for the discipline. 80-89 OUTSTANDING WORK Meets assessment criteria within the word limit, with excellent presentation Correctly referenced Satisfactorily maintains confidentiality of persons and location. Demonstrates outstanding understanding of the subject. Breadth and depth of reading is evident Analysis is substantially demonstrated in reasoned opinions Some originality is evident in the inter-relationship between theory and practice. Debates different forms of evidence to analyse the issues. Evidence of reflection, problem solving and decision making. Produces clear recommendations and/or new perspectives for the discipline. 70-79 EXCELLENT / ABOVE AVERAGE WORK Meets assessment criteria within word limit, good presentation Correctly referenced Satisfactorily maintains confidentiality of persons and location. Demonstrates excellent understanding of the subject. Breadth and depth of reading is evident Analysis is well demonstrated in reasoned opinions Some originality is evident in the inter-relationship between theory and practice. Appraises different forms of evidence to analyse the issues. Evidence of reflection and problem solving. Produces clear recommendations and/or new perspectives for the discipline. 60-69 ABOVE AVERAGE WORK Meets assessment criteria within word limit, good presentation Most references correct. Satisfactorily maintains confidentiality of persons and location. Demonstrates good understanding of the subject. Breadth and depth of reading is evident Some analysis is demonstrated in reasoned opinions Demonstration of the inter-relationship between theory and practice. Reviews different forms of evidence to analyse the issues. Evidence of reflection and problem solving. Produces clear recommendations and/or new perspectives for the discipline. 50-59 AVERAGE WORK Mainly meets assessment criteria within word limit, satisfactory presentation. Many references correct, with some minor inaccuracies. Satisfactorily maintains confidentiality of persons and location. Demonstrates satisfactory understanding of the subject. Satisfactory evidence of appropriate reading Satisfactory analysis is demonstrated. Demonstrates some insights into the subject area. Demonstration of the inter-relationship between theory and practice. May use different forms of evidence to analyse the issues. Evidence of some reflection and problem solving. Produces appropriate recommendations and/or new perspectives for the discipline. 40-49 UNSATISFACTORY WORK Meets some of the assessment criteria within word limit, satisfactory presentation. Many references correct, with some minor inaccuracies and some major inaccuracies. Satisfactorily maintains confidentiality of persons and location. Demonstrates satisfactory but limited understanding of the subject. Evidence of reading from a limited range of appropriate literature Limited analysis is demonstrated Demonstrates some insights into the subject area. Limited attempt to demonstrate the relationship between theory and practice. May use limited forms of evidence to describe the issues. Limited evidence of reflection and problem solving. Produces limited but appropriate recommendations and/or new perspectives for the discipline. 30-39 FAIL Majority of assessment criteria not met or partially met. May not have adhered to word limit guidance. Poor presentation and/or structure. Many references incorrect or absent. Fails to maintain confidentiality of persons and location. Demonstrates limited understanding of the subject Little evidence of reading from appropriate sources No or limited analysis is demonstrated Demonstrates minimal insights into the subject area. Limited or no attempt to demonstrate the relationship between theory and practice. May use limited forms of evidence to describe the issues. No or limited evidence of reflection and problem solving. Produces limited recommendations and/or new perspectives for the discipline 20-29 UNSATISFACTORY WORK Assessment criteria not met May not have adhered to word limit guidance Poor presentation and/or structure Many references incorrect or absent. Fails to maintain confidentiality of persons and location. Demonstrates limited or inaccurate understanding of the subject Unsatisfactory use of evidence from a limited range of sources No analysis is demonstrated Demonstrates no insights into the subject area. Limited or no attempt to demonstrate the relationship between theory and practice. May use limited or unsatisfactory forms of evidence to describe the issues. No or very limited reflection and problem solving. No recommendations and/or new perspectives for the discipline< 20 unacceptable work assessment criteria not met may not have adhered to word limit guidance poor presentation and/or structure many references incorrect or absent. breaches professional confidentiality code demonstrates no understanding assessment criteria not addressed no evidence of reflection included, no recommendations made 20="" unacceptable="" work="" assessment="" criteria="" not="" met="" may="" not="" have="" adhered="" to="" word="" limit="" guidance="" poor="" presentation="" and/or="" structure="" many="" references="" incorrect="" or="" absent.="" breaches="" professional="" confidentiality="" code="" demonstrates="" no="" understanding="" assessment="" criteria="" not="" addressed="" no="" evidence="" of="" reflection="" included,="" no="" recommendations="">