Course: Health Promotion Strategies In this paper you will compare two health promotion interventions targeting the same health issue. Search the library and find two articles that evaluate health...

1 answer below »
.


Course: Health Promotion Strategies In this paper you will compare two health promotion interventions targeting the same health issue. Search the library and find two articles that evaluate health promotion programs that have similar goals (Example: Both have the goal of controlling hypertension). · Identify the strategies, theories and settings that the program used. · Include: · Which health behavior are the programs aiming to change? · Why is the health behavior significant? (incidence & prevalence of issues that could occur due to health behavior) · Detail how each of the 2 programs were implemented · Compare the impact and outcomes of the two programs · Critique the two programs/interventions · 7 pages content double-spaced, APA, title page, reference page Week Four_ Research Paper. Comparing In...otion Strategies - National University 7/23/22, 11:41 AM Week Four: Research Paper. Comparing Interventions - COH618 Health Promotion Strategies - National University https://nationalu.brightspace.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=150936&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=33077 1/5 Research paper Rubric COH 618 Course: COH618 Health Promotion Strategies Criteria OUTSTANDIN G ACHIEVEMEN T COMMENDA BLE ACHIEVEMEN T MARGINAL ACHIEVEMEN T UNSATISFAC TORY FAILING Criterion Score 2 evaluated interventio ns / 15.000001 Significant health behavior / 10 15.000001 points Student has selected two evaluated intervention s that target the same health issue. The two intervention s have been implemented and evaluated and used significantly different strategies. 13.500001 points Student has selected two evaluated intervention s that target the same health issue. The two intervention s have been implemented and evaluated. 10.5 points Student has selected two evaluated intervention s that target the same health issue. 9 points The selected intervention s do not clearly address the same health issue. 0 points missing 10 points The health issue that is addressed is clearly a significant public health issue for the target population. 9 points The health issue that is addressed is a significant public health issue for the target population. 7 points The health issue that is addressed is somewhat a significant public health issue for the target population. 6 points The health issue that is addressed is marginally a significant public health issue for the target population. 0 points 7/23/22, 11:41 AM Week Four: Research Paper. Comparing Interventions - COH618 Health Promotion Strategies - National University https://nationalu.brightspace.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=150936&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=33077 2/5 Criteria OUTSTANDIN G ACHIEVEMEN T COMMENDA BLE ACHIEVEMEN T MARGINAL ACHIEVEMEN T UNSATISFAC TORY FAILING Criterion Score Implementa tion / 20 Compare and Contrast / 20 Critique of two programs / 20 Writing Style / 10 20 points The student gives a very clear description of how each program was implemented . 18 points The student gives a clear description of how each program was implemented . 14 points The student gives a somewhat clear description of how each program was implemented . 12 points The student gives a marginally clear description of how each program was implemented . 0 points 20 points Student makes several clear comparisons between the two programs. 18 points Student makes some clear comparisons between the two programs. 14 points Student makes few clear comparisons between the two programs. 12 points Student makes very few clear comparisons between the two programs. 0 points missing 20 points Student applies knowledge from the study of health promotion to critique the two intervention s. 18 points Student applies some knowledge from the study of health promotion to critique the two intervention s. 14 points Student applies little knowledge from the study of health promotion to critique the two intervention s. 12 points Student applies minimal knowledge from the study of health promotion to critique the two intervention s. 0 points 10 points All sentences 9 points Almost all sentences 7 points Most sentences 6 points Sentences lack 0 points Errors in writing 7/23/22, 11:41 AM Week Four: Research Paper. Comparing Interventions - COH618 Health Promotion Strategies - National University https://nationalu.brightspace.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=150936&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=33077 3/5 Criteria OUTSTANDIN G ACHIEVEMEN T COMMENDA BLE ACHIEVEMEN T MARGINAL ACHIEVEMEN T UNSATISFAC TORY FAILING Criterion Score are well- constructed with varied structure. All sentences sound natural and are easy-on- the-ear when read aloud. Each sentence is clear and has an obvious emphasis. Writer makes no errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Writer makes no errors in capitalizatio n or punctuation, so the paper is exceptionall y easy to read. Writer uses vivid words and phrases that linger or draw pictures in the reader's sound natural and are easy-on- the-ear when read aloud, but 1 or 2 are stiff and awkward or difficult to understand. Writer makes few errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Writer makes 1 or 2 errors in capitalizatio n or punctuation, but the paper is still easy to read. Writer uses vivid words and phrases that linger or draw pictures in the reader's mind, but occasionally the words are used inaccurately are well- constructed but have a similar structure. Most sentences sound natural and are easy-on- the-ear when read aloud, but several are stiff and awkward or are difficult to understand. Writer makes some errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Writer makes a few errors in capitalizatio n and/or punctuation that catch the reader's attention and interrupt the flow. Writer uses words that structure and appear incomplete or rambling. The sentences are difficult to read aloud because they sound awkward, are distractingly repetitive, or are difficult to understand. Writer makes many errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Writer makes several errors in capitalizatio n and/or punctuation that catch the reader's attention and greatly interrupt the throughout. 7/23/22, 11:41 AM Week Four: Research Paper. Comparing Interventions - COH618 Health Promotion Strategies - National University https://nationalu.brightspace.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=150936&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=33077 4/5 Total / 100.000001 Criteria OUTSTANDIN G ACHIEVEMEN T COMMENDA BLE ACHIEVEMEN T MARGINAL ACHIEVEMEN T UNSATISFAC TORY FAILING Criterion Score Referencin g / 5 mind, and the choice and placement of the words seems accurate, natural and not forced. or seem overdone. communicat e clearly, but the writing lacks variety, punch or flair. flow. Writer uses a limited vocabulary that does not communicat e strongly or capture the reader's interest. Jargon or cliches may be present and detract from the meaning. 5 points Citations and references are in proper APA format. Ample sources are cited. All claims are supported with a professional reference. 4.5 points Citations and references are in proper APA format. Ample sources are cited. Some claims leave the reader looking for a reference. 3.5 points Citations and references are in proper APA format. Ample sources are cited. Many claims leave the reader looking for a reference. 3 points Citations and references are limited, missing or incorrect. 0 points Citations and references are missing or incorrect. 7/23/22, 11:41 AM Week Four: Research Paper. Comparing Interventions - COH618 Health Promotion Strategies - National University https://nationalu.brightspace.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=150936&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=33077 5/5 Overall Score OUTSTANDING ACHIEVEMENT 95 points minimum COMMENDABLE ACHIEVEMENT 80 points minimum MARGINAL ACHIEVEMENT 65 points minimum UNSATISFA CTORY 30 points minimum FAILING 0 points minimum
Answered 2 days AfterJul 23, 2022

Answer To: Course: Health Promotion Strategies In this paper you will compare two health promotion...

Insha answered on Jul 26 2022
69 Votes
Running Head: Health Promotion Strategies                            1
Health Promotion Strategies                                    2
HEALTH PROMOTION STRATEGIES
Table of Contents
Introduction    3
Background    3
Need for change    4
Significance    4
Implementation    5
Multi-component interventions    5
Health screenings    5
Comparison of outcome    6
Critique    7
Conclusion    9
References    10
Introduction
Health promotion is a top issue for these populations since they exhibit lower levels of healthy habits than
older people and people with intellectual and developmental impairments. In order to understand the strategies employed by both and identify innovative and new practices that disability researchers can learn from one another, this paper reviews the two fields of disability and aging health promotion research using two interventions: multi-component interventions and screening.
Background
Compared to past generations, those with developmental and intellectual impairments are living longer. However, they frequently have poorer health and the beginning of age-related illnesses early due to challenges with access to treatment and biological and lifestyle variables. They make up around six million of the population in America and develop osteoporosis and diabetes early in life (Kinnear et al. 2018). Numerous studies show that persons with developmental and intellectual impairments have lower levels of physical activity, poor fitness, poor nutrition, and a higher risk of falling.
A little more than 28% e34% of people over the age of 65 and 35% e44% of people over the age of 75 are not active (Alexander et al. 2020). A wide variety of treatments have been carefully studied and well-documented for decades in the field of health promotion for older individuals. Gerontologists will be better able to provide culturally appropriate therapies if they are aware of the underlying principles in disability scholarship. Two categories of interventions were used to classify the papers under review: multicomponent interventions and health care and screening interventions. The interventions were carried out in a variety of contexts, including community settings (50%) and residential facilities (21%) (Alexander et al. 2020).
Need for change
Compared to the general population, people with intellectual impairments have a greater frequency of health issues, and their needs are frequently ignored. The Healthy Persons 2010 project in the United States and the Valuing People initiative in the United Kingdom both specifically aim to improve the health of people with disabilities throughout their lifetimes (Kinnear et al. 2018). An improvement in health was observed in the intervention group in a recent randomised controlled study on yearly health screenings in adults with intellectual disabilities.
The physical and/or mental health of the person is impacted by a wide range of medical issues that are linked to intellectual disability. In terms of physical health, epilepsy, mobility issues, and sensory issues are the most prevalent issues. There is evidence that secondary health issues in persons with intellectual impairment include obesity, fractures, poor dental health, constipation, and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Poor oral health is common, and difficult behaviour may be caused by dental pain.
Significance
Because they may not be able to comprehend the importance of their physical symptoms, people with intellectual impairments may not report them as soon as they should. Physical issues might present themselves as difficult conduct or a loss of everyday function rather than somatic symptoms. Psychotropic medications administered for problematic behaviour might sometimes cause physical issues as a side effect.
Inadequate financial level, social marginalization, and a lack of social networks are all linked to lower self-reported health status, according to a cross-sectional research of 1273 persons with intellectual impairment in the UK (Willner et al. 2018). Rarely are individuals with intellectual impairments represented in European health information systems. Therefore, the prevalence of various illnesses is influenced by the lack of easily comprehensible health promotion and intervention materials.
Implementation
Multi-component interventions
Adults with developmental and intellectual impairments have been found to benefit from intensive physical and mental health interventions in terms of their physical, behavioural, and psychological results. These treatments had a variety of positive effects, such as lowered blood pressure, enhanced balance, increased strength, and increased aerobic and respiratory...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here