DATA ANALYTICS FOR DECISION MAKINGASSIGNMENT 2MAXIMUM MARKS: 35ANSWER BOTH THE CASESCase study:1 20 MARKSIn a study conducted by Zogby International for the Democrat and...

1 answer below »









DATA ANALYTICS FOR DECISION MAKING














ASSIGNMENT 2























MAXIMUM MARKS: 35





























ANSWER BOTH THE CASES























Case study:1 20 MARKS











In a study conducted by Zogby International for the Democrat and Chronicle, more than 700 New Yorkers were polled to determine whether the New York state government works. Respondents surveyed were asked questions involving pay cuts for state legislators, restrictions on lobbyists, term limits for legislators, and whether state citizens should be able to put matters directly on the state ballot for a vote. The results regarding several proposed reforms had broad support, crossing all demographic and political lines.








Suppose that a follow-up survey of 100 individuals, who live in the western region of New York was conducted, as well as their responses to the following three questions.








1.








Should legislative pay be cut for every day the state budget is late? Yes…. No……








2.








Should there be more restrictions on lobbyists? Yes……. No……








3.








Should there be term limits requiring that legislators serve a fixed number of years? Yes…… No….








The responses were coded using 1 for a Yes response and 2 for a No response. The complete data set is available in the file named NYReform.








Managerial report:








1.








Use descriptive statistics to summarize the data from this study. What are your preliminary conclusions about the independence of the response (Yes or No) and party affiliation for each of the three questions in the survey?








2.








With regard to question 1, test for the independence of the response (Yes and No) and party affiliation. Use level of significance as 0.05.








3.








With regard to question 2, test for the independence of the response (Yes and No) and party affiliation. Use level of significance as 0.05.








4.








With regard to question 3, test for the independence of the response (Yes and No) and party affiliation. Use level of significance as 0.05.








5.








Does it appear that there is a broad support for change across all political lines? Explain.






































Case 2 15 MARKS











Par.Inc., is a major manufacturer of golf equipment. Management believes that Par’s market share could be increased with the introduction of a cut-resistant, longer-lasting golf ball. Therefore, the research group at Par has been investigating a new golf ball coating designed to resist cuts and provide a more durable ball. The tests with the coating have been promising.








One of the researchers voiced concern about the effect of the new coating on driving distances. Par would like the new cut-resistant ball to offer driving distances comparable to those of the current-model golf ball. To compare the driving distances for the two balls, 40 balls of both the new and current models were subjected to distance tests. The testing was performed with a mechanical hitting machine so that any difference between the mean distances for the two models could be attributed to a difference in the two models. The results of the tests, with distances measured to the nearest yard, follow. Using the golf.xls write a managerial report.








-








Formulate and present the rationale for a hypothesis test that Par could use to compare the driving distances of the current and new golf balls.








-








Analyze the data to provide the hypothesis testing conclusion. What is the p-value for your test? What is your recommendation for Par, Inc?








-








Provide descriptive statistical summarizes of the data for each model.








-








What is the 95% confidence interval for the population mean driving distances of each model, and what is the 95% confidence interval for the difference between the means of the two populations?





Do you see a need for larger sample sizes and more testing with the golf balls? Discuss
Answered 3 days AfterJan 11, 2023

Answer To: DATA ANALYTICS FOR DECISION MAKINGASSIGNMENT 2MAXIMUM MARKS: 35ANSWER BOTH THE...

Monica answered on Jan 14 2023
36 Votes
DATA ANALYTICS FOR DECISION MAKING
ASSIGNMENT 2
Case study:1                                    
Solution
Given –
1. In order to summarize the data, use frequency tables to show the number of respondents who answered Yes or No and cross - tabulate those frequencies by party affiliation.
The following obtained results are shown
below,
    Sum of Observation
    Party
     
     
     
    Lobbyists?
    Democrat
    Independent
    Republican
    Grand Total
    1
    452
    707
    2660
    3819
    2
    214
    167
    850
    1231
    Grand Total
    666
    874
    3510
    5050
    Sum of Observation
    Party
     
     
     
    Term Limits?
    Democrat
    Independent
    Republican
    Grand Total
    1
    313
    442
    2534
    3289
    2
    353
    432
    976
    1761
    Grand Total
    666
    874
    3510
    5050
    Sum of Observation
    Party
     
     
     
    Pay Cut?
    Democrat
    Independent
    Republican
    Grand Total
    1
    380
    472
    3075
    3927
    2
    286
    402
    435
    1123
    Grand Total
    666
    874
    3510
    5050
Based on the data, the following observations can be made:
1. For the question "Should there be more restrictions on lobbyists?", a majority of respondents across all party affiliations answered "Yes" (452 Democrats, 707 Independents, 2660 Republicans).
2. For the question "Should there be term limits requiring that legislators serve a fixed number of years?”, a majority of respondents across all party affiliations answered "Yes" (313 Democrats, 442 Independents, 2534 Republicans).
3. For the question "Should legislative pay be cut for every day the state budget is late?", a majority of respondents across all party affiliations answered "Yes" (380 Democrats, 472 Independents, 3075 Republicans).
2)
The null and alternative hypothesis is given by,
: There is no association between the response and the party affiliation
There is association between the response and the party affiliation

Chi – square test
    
    Sum of Observation
    Party
     
     
     
    
    Pay Cut?
    Democrat
    Independent
    Republican
    Grand Total
    
    1
    380
    472
    3075
    3927
    
    2
    286
    402
    435
    1123
    
    Grand Total
    666
    874
    3510
    5050
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    E
     
    517.8974
    679.6432
    2729.459406
     
     
    
    148.1026
    194.3568
    780.5405941
     
     
    
    
    
    
     
    (O - E)
    
    -137.897
    -207.643
    345.5405941
     
     
    
    137.8974
    207.6432
    -345.5405941
     
     
    
    
    
    
     
    (O - E)^2
    
    19015.7
    43115.69
    119398.3021
     
     
    
    19015.7
    43115.69
    119398.3021
     
     
    
    
    
    
     
    (O - E)^2/E
    36.71712
    63.43871
    43.74430405
     
     
    
    128.3955
    221.8378
    152.9687284
     
     
     
     
     
    
Chi sq test statistic
    647.1020967
    
    
    
    
    Probability value
    0.000
The chi – square test statistic is equal to 647.1020967
Decision Rule:
1. Reject the null hypothesis if the p – value is less than 0.05
2. Fail to reject the null hypothesis if the p – value is not less than 0.05
Since, the p – value is less than 0.05 we reject the null hypothesis.
Thus, there is enough evidence at 5% level of significance to support the claim that there is an association between the party...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here