Developing a Cloud Model for an Organization and business use case template all details inside please if any query contact me
Assessment 4 Assessment type: Group Project – Group work (up to 3 students). Purpose: Demonstrates students can effectively work in a group to analyse requirements for the planning of a cloud strategy for a medium to large enterprise. This assessment contributes to learning outcomes c and d. Value: 30%Due Date: Cloud Implementation Overview Model (Item A) – Week 6 Final report (Items B to J) – Week 11 Presentation – Week 12 Assessment topic: Developing a Cloud Model for an Organization Task Details: An initial transition to the cloud Business use case. This is an executive level report with enough detail and explanation (with diagrams) of concepts that management and front-line staff will understand. The cloud strategy specification is to be completed by each group and added to the Business use case Template provided. Business Use Case Template A. Cloud Implementation Overview Model (diagram) – Due week 6 B. Proposed Cloud Computing Concept of Operations (from the business case provided - anyadditional details added by the group is optional) C. Service Model(s) D. Deployment Model(s) E. Cloud Computing Essential Characteristics F. Security G. Concerns, Challenges, Additional resources for information (relevant to the case) H. Report quality, group member tasks log, and any additional diagrams (with Visio file)supporting each relevant section I. Team participation for each team member based on Group Activity Report. J. Presentation. Customized diagrams to suit the case are expected for items a, b, c, d, e, f, g. Note on Diagrams: Although copies of generic diagrams from the text may explain a concept well and indeed be relevant to this project case, please be aware if the diagrams you submit are copied directly from the text resources and remain unchanged, these will not be allocated the same level of marks as diagrams that have clearly been custom designed and developed by group members. Of course, using the text example diagrams is a good starting point/template and it is expected and encouraged that the text examples are utilized for inspiration and verification, but be specific in the positioning, labelling and naming of components accordingly to suit the business case details as provided. Submission requirements details: Sections expected to be completed and added to the report include: Sections Marks Cloud Implementation Overview Model 5 Additional Details on the cloud concept of operations 2 Service Model(s) 2 Deployment Model(s) 2 Cloud Computing Essential Characteristics 2 Security 3 Concerns, Challenges and additional information 2 Report Quality, group members task log and additional diagrams 2 Group Activity Report 5 Presentation 5 Total 30 1. Choose a case study to analyse and determine the requirements for the example enterprise business needs. 2. Organize group member task allocations. 3. Get started on creating an initial model (diagram) showing an overview of the case. The diagram can be improved after feedback from your tutor. Use diagrams from the text as a starting point for each section then custom build your own to fit the case. Visio is the simplest tool to use and will be used extensively throughout the tutorials. 4. Create additional models (diagrams) to support each relevant section. 5. Complete the sections to provide definitions and details relevant to the case. 6. A professionally formatted report is expected. 7. Review each group members’ progress (adjustments may be needed). Keep a log of member tasks and submitting this as a spreadsheet has marks available (item i). 8. One report per group should be submitted. 9. No limitation applies to the size of this report, but keep in mind it is for executive and senior management staff level. At least 15 to 20 pages are expected, but providing more will not be penalized if the information is relevant. 10. Research is encouraged and rewarded – only if it is clearly identified. Do not simply copy generic information without having appropriate referencing and be sure the information has been written to apply specifically to this Project. 11. Poor referencing and lack of information source acknowledgement will be penalized. Be sure to refer to section 3.3 Plagiarism and Referencing. Harvard referencing is expected. Marks will be deducted for poor referencing. Each group will provide the following: 1. A group work report on how the group has worked together to produce the group report. It should not contain the main deliverables of the main group report. 2. Document on how members discuss and agree the division of responsibilities and describes how individual efforts capitalized on the strengths of each group member. It will be used as evidence of individual contributions in the group. It is therefore in each member’s interest to ensure that their contribution to the final report is complete. 3. The minutes of group meetings should be documented and attached as an appendix of this group work report, clearly indicating who was present, issues and actions, agreed timelines, and the like. 4. The group work report mustindicate that a fair and reasonable distribution of work amongst group members was achieved. Periodic information such as emails or diary entries must be inserted into the correct section in chronological order. If the submitted group work report suggests that not all contributions were of equivalent standard and effort, differential marks will be awarded to individuals within the same group. It must also document what individual group members understood as their allocated tasks, that individual group members submitted allocated work of acceptable standard and quality by the date that was agreed upon. All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date. References should be cited in the report and should be listed appropriately using Harvard Anglia referencing style. Submission requirements details: All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date. References should be cited in the report and should be listed appropriately using Harvard Anglia referencing style. Marking Rubric for Assessment 4. Group Project. Value 25% (20%+5%) Criteria Fail (0 – 49%) Pass (50 – 64%) Credit (65 – 74%) Distinction (75 – 84%) High Distinction (85 – 100%) Submit Cloud model (a) Submitted late, using incorrect format. Submitted on time, with incorrect format, Submitted on time, in correct format, Submitted on time, in correct format, Submitted on time, in correct format, Submit cloud strategy report Item s (b to I) (see above task details) Poorly presented, showing inadequate understanding of concepts, Some unclear information, showing adequate understanding of concepts. Adequately presented showing good understanding of concept Well-presented showing excellent understanding of concepts. Well-presented showing exceptional understanding of concepts. Team Participation (based on Group Activity Report) – 5% (separate rubric) Makes minimal contribution to team tasks, leadership and motivation. Makes adequate contribution to team tasks, some to leadership and motivation of team. Makes sound contribution to team tasks, leadership and motivation. Makes significant contribution to team tasks, leadership and motivation. Makes exceptional contribution to team tasks, leadership and motivation. Total Mark:25% COMMENTS: Group Work Activity Report Rubric - 5 marks Criteria Fail (0 – 49%) Pass (50 – 64%) Credit (65 – 74%) Distinction (75 – 84%) High Distinction (85 – 100%) Documentation Group Work Activity Report No meeting minutes Group Work Activity Report Less than 2 meeting minutes Group Work Activity Report; Less than 3 meeting minutes Group Work Activity Report; 3 meeting minutes; Group Work Activity Report; 3 meeting minutes; Other source documents Group Participation Only one person actively participate More than one Persons actively participate At least half the students confer or present ideas At least 3/4 of Students actively participate All students Enthusiastically participate Shared Responsibility Exclusive reliance on only one person Exclusive reliance on more than one person Responsibility is Shared by half the group members Responsibility is Shared by most group members Responsibility for task is shared evenly Quality of Interaction No interaction; No evidence of discussion or alternatives Little interaction; little evidence of discussion or alternatives Some ability to interact; some evidence of discussion or alternatives Students show Adeptness in interacting; lively Discussion centres on the task Excellent listening And leadership skills exhibited; students reflect awareness of others’ views and opinions in their discussions Roles Within Group No effort made to Little effort made to Students assigned roles Each student Each student assign roles to group assign roles to group but roles were not assigned a role but assigned a clearly defined members members consistently adhered to roles not clearly role; group members defined or perform roles effectively consistently adhered to Presentation Rubric - 5 marks Criteria Quality of presentation Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction (0 - 49%) (50 - 64%) (65 - 74%) (75 - 84%) (85 - 100%) Reading through the slides and not sure about what information is present on the corresponding slides Managed to deliver the content on the slide, however frequent focus on the slides Had some ability to interact; some evidence of discussion and contact with the audience Good eye contact with the audience and sure about the slides to some extent Excellent presentation skills and good contact with the audience