Do only quantitative or Qualitative research. I do not want a mix research topic.
BUSN20019 ASSESSMENT 1 Step 1 – MARKING RUBRIC In case of high Turnitin similarity scores, markers analyse the similarity score on a case by case basis and you will see relevant comments in your assignment, if necessary. Late submission penalties are being applied to this assignment as per the university regulations. Any students deemed to have conducted Academic Misconduct are being reported and will be informed of the outcome of the investigation and any related penalties via their student email address. Each student must complete the 3 minutes tutorial presentation in either week 2 or 4, before submitting this assessment to receive a feedback on assessment 1.1. Criteria 0 (Not Shown) 1 (Poor) 2 (Unsatisfactory) 3 (Satisfactory) 4 (Good) 5 (Very Good) 6 (Excellent) 1. Clarity and suitability of statement of 'field of research' 10% No field of research included or inappropriate field of research and /or no mention of the profession. Field of research statement is highly unclear and/or entirely unsuitable and/or no mention of the profession. Field of research statement is unclear and/or unsuitable and/or no mention of the profession. Reasonable field of research statement that is, however, not entirely clear and/or suitable. Profession may be implied rather than clear. Generally good field of research statement but may lack consistency, clarity and/or suitability. Relevance to the profession is mentioned. Very clear field of research statement with suitable relevance to the profession explained. Field of research statement is entirely clear and suitable with faultless and integrated explanation of relevance to the profession. 2. Suitability of data sources (raw publicly available secondary data sources/links) 20% No data sources included or attempt to use academic literature as data. Highly unclear or highly unsuitable data sources included and/or very poorly explained. Unclear or unsuitable data sources included and/or poorly explained. Based on the explanation, this project may contain suitable data sources but this requires further explanation to be fully clear. Suitable data sources although more clarity and/or better explanation is required. Suitable data sources included although some minor inconsistencies and/or unclear areas. Highly suitable data sources included and well explained. 3. Research questions 20% Entirely unsuitable or irrelevant RQs or missing. Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic OR too vague/too many Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic OR too vague/too many Effective presentation of RQs; may be inconsistent or somewhat unclear Convincing presentation of RQs; may be slightly inconsistent or unclear Highly competent presentation of RQs; consistent and clear Superior presentation of RQs; entirely consistent and clear 4. Search terms 10% Missing or entirely unsuitable or irrelevant. Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic OR too vague/too many Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic OR too vague/too many Effective search terms; may be somewhat inconsistent or unclear. Convincing search terms; may be slightly inconsistent or unclear. Very good search terms; consistent and clear. Excellent search terms; well thought through and logical; fully consistent and clear. 5. Ability to integrate sources into academic writing 20% No academic sources used or no appropriate sentences written or no reference list included. Less than 3 academic sources used and/or very poor integration into sentences and/or very poor reference list. Less than 3 academic sources used and/or poor integration into sentences and/or poor reference list. 3 academic sources placed into reasonable sentences although not well integrated; satisfactory referencing skills. 3 academic sources placed into well written sentences although not well integrated; good referencing skills. 3 academic sources reasonably well integrated into well-written sentences; very good referencing skills. 3 (or more) academic sources integrated very well into sophisticated sentences with faultless referencing. 6. Professional presentation and accuracy of work 20% Highly unprofessional work in terms of formatting, writing and/or referencing. Inaccurate. Unprofessional work in terms of formatting, writing and/or referencing. Inaccurate. Unprofessional work in terms of formatting, writing or referencing. Inaccurate. Satisfactory and reasonably accurate work in terms of formatting, writing and referencing. More professionalism is required. Generally professional and accurate work in terms of formatting, writing and referencing. Some mistakes and/or omissions may be present. Very professional and accurate work in terms of formatting, writing and referencing. Minor errors and/or omissions are acceptable. Highly professional work in terms of formatting, writing and referencing. Faultlessly accurate. BUSN20019 ASSESSMENT 1 Step 1 – MARKING RUBRIC In case of high Turnitin similarity scores, m arkers analyse the similarity score on a case by case basis and you will see relevant comments in your assignment, if necessary. Late submission penalties are being applied to this assignment as per the university regulations. Any students deemed to have conducted Academic Misconduct are being reported and will be informed of the outcome of the inves tigation and any related penalties via their student email addr ess. Each student must complete the 3 minutes tutorial presentation in either week 2 or 4, before submitting this assessment to receive a feedback on assessment 1.1 . Criteria 0 (Not Shown) 1 (Poor) 2 (Unsatisfactory) 3 (Satisfactory) 4 ( Good ) 5 ( Very Good) 6 (Excellent ) 1. Clarity and suitability of statement of 'field of research' 1 0% No field of research included or inappropriate field of research and /or no mention of the profession. Field of research statement is highly unclear and/or entirely unsuitable and/or no mention of the profession. Field of research statement is unclear and/or unsuitable and/or no mention of the profession. Reasonable field of research statement that is, however, not entirely clear and/or suitable. Profession may be imp lied rather than clear. Generally good field of research statement but may lack consistency, clarity and/or suitability. Relevance to the profession is mentioned. Very clear field of research statement with suitable relevance to the profession explained. Field of research statement is entirely clear and suitable with faultless and integrated explanation of relevance to the profession. 2. Suitability of data sources ( raw publicly available secondary data sources/links ) 2 0% No data sources included or attempt to use academic literature as data. Highly unclear or highly unsuitable data sources included and/or very poorly explained. Unclear or unsuitable data sources included and/or poorly explained. Based on the explanation, this project may contain suitable data sources but this requires further explana tion to be fully clear. Suitable data sources although more clarity and/or better explanation is required. Suitable data sources included although some minor inconsistencies and/or unclear areas. Highly suitable data sources included and well explained. 3. Research questions 20% Entirely unsuitable or irrelevant RQs or missing. Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic OR too vague/too many Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic OR too vague/too many Effective presentation of RQs; may be inconsistent or somewhat unclear Convincing presentation of RQs; may be slightly inconsistent or unclear Highly competent presentation of RQs; consistent and clear Superior presentation of RQs; entirely consistent and clear 4 . Search terms 1 0% Missing or entirely unsuitable or irrelevant. Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic OR too vague/too many Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic OR too vague/too many Effective search terms; may be somewhat inconsistent or unclear. Convincing search terms; may be slightly inconsistent or unclear. Very good search terms; consistent and clear. Excellent search terms; well thought through and logical; fully consistent and clear. 5 . Ability to integrate sources into academic writing 20% No academic sources used or no appropriate sentences written or no reference list included. Less than 3 academic sources used and/or very poor integration into sentences and/or very poor reference list. Less than 3 academic sources used and/or poor integration into sentences and/or poor reference list. 3 academic sources placed into reasonable sentences although not well integrated; satisfactory referencing skills. 3 academic sources placed into well written sentences although not well integrated; good referencing skills. 3 academic sources reasonably well integrated into well - written sentences; very good referencing skills. 3 (or more) academic sources integ rated very well into sophisticated sentences with faultless referencing. 6 . Professional presentation and accuracy of work 2 0% Highly unprofessional work in terms of formatting, writing and/or referencing. Inaccurate. Unprofessional work in terms of formatting, writing and/or referencing. Inaccurate. Unprofessional work in terms of formatting, writing or referencing. Inaccurate. Satisfactory and reasonably accurate work in terms of formatting, writing and referencing. More professionalism is required. Generally professional and accurate work in terms of formatting, writing and referencing. Some mistakes and/or omissions may be present. Very professional and accurate work in terms of formatting, writing and referencing. Minor errors and/or omissions are acceptable. Highly professional work in terms of formatting, writing and referencing. Faultlessly accurate. BUSN20019 ASSESSMENT 1 Step 1 – MARKING RUBRIC In case of high Turnitin similarity scores, markers analyse the similarity score on a case by case basis and you will see relevant comments in your assignment, if necessary. Late submission penalties are being applied to this assignment as per the university regulations. Any students deemed to have conducted Academic Misconduct are being reported and will be informed of the outcome of the investigation and any related penalties via their student email address