ECOM4000 Economics Individual Assignment T3 2021 Kaplan Business School (KBS), Australia 1 Document Classification: Public ECOM4000 T3 2021 Individual Assignment (20%) This assignment is worth 20% of...

1 answer below »
hi


ECOM4000 Economics Individual Assignment T3 2021 Kaplan Business School (KBS), Australia 1 Document Classification: Public ECOM4000 T3 2021 Individual Assignment (20%) This assignment is worth 20% of your final mark. The assignment has two sections. Section A (worth 20 marks) is on microeconomics and Section B (also worth 20 marks) is on macroeconomics. This assignment must be completed individually and submitted using Turnitin on the portal before the due date. When doing this assignment, you might like to consider the following points. • Answer each question directly and fully, using the minimum number of words. You do not need to write an essay. The total word limit is 1500 words for the entire assignment. • Where necessary, make sure you explain your diagrams. You can insert diagrams by drawing them in programs like “paint” and pasting them into the document, or by drawing them by hand, scanning them and then pasting them as a picture into the document. Do not copy pictures or graphs from the internet - you must draw them yourself (it’s ok if they are a bit messy...). • Reference your answers if you are using information from another source using in text referencing and include a reference list at the end of the assignment. You do not need to reference subject material given to you in ECOM4000. • Because the assignment is to be submitted using Turnitin, any plagiarism will be identified. It is possible that you could get zero for your assignment if you copy someone else’s work. • Consult the Academic Success Centre resources on the portal and on campus for assistance with referencing and plagiarism. ECOM4000 Economics Individual Assignment T3 2021 Kaplan Business School (KBS), Australia 2 Document Classification: Public Section A: Microeconomics (20 marks) Question 1 Identify the market structure Coles and Woolworths operate in. Make sure you justify your choice of market structure using all of the market characteristics used to classify markets. Using your own independent research, provide some facts and brief comments on this market (for example you may like to discuss metrics like the concentration ratio). (6 marks) Question 2 Because of their market positions, Coles and Woolworths exhibit a great deal of interdependence and actively advertise against each other. In particular, Coles has been successful with their “Down Down” campaign. Briefly explain what this campaign is, and explain the effect you think it has had on the market position and profitability of both Coles and Woolworths. Draw appropriate diagrams for this market showing the market outcomes for Coles and Woolworths. (6 marks) Question 3 Consider a “game” between Coles and Woolworths that the supermarkets may participate in. The rules of the game are: • If both Coles and Woolworths keep prices low, then they will both make a profit of $5,000m. • If both Coles and Woolworths keep prices high, then they will both make a profit of $8,000m. • If one supermarket keeps prices low and the other keeps prices high, then the low price supermarket will make $9,000m profit and the high price supermarket will make $4,500m profit. Using these rules, solve this game for the Nash equilibrium (make sure to include your diagram and the logic you followed to solve the game). Is your outcome the best one for both Coles and Woolworths? Explain your answer. (8 marks) ECOM4000 Economics Individual Assignment T3 2021 Kaplan Business School (KBS), Australia 3 Document Classification: Public Section B: Macroeconomics (20 marks) Question 1 Using your own independent research, summarise the effect the coronavirus has had on the Australian macroeconomy. At a minimum, your answer should include commentary about the effect on Australian GDP, unemployment, inflation and other aspects of the Australian macroeconomy. Support your comments with appropriate economic data. (Make sure you use reputable economic sources and reference your sources.) (6 marks) Question 2 Draw a diagram of the Australian macroeconomy using the aggregate demand and aggregate supply (AD/AS) model before, and then after the virus. Clearly show on your diagram(s) the before and after effects for the macroeconomic variables discussed in Question 1. (7 marks) Question 3 The Federal Australian Government was very aware of the effects of the virus on the Australian economy. Using your own independent research, explain the fiscal policy actions the Government undertook to combat the economic impact of the virus. (Make sure you use reputable economic sources and reference your sources.) Using your diagram from Question 2, show how the government action affected the Australian macroeconomy. Comment on how successful the government action has been, and identify any weaknesses associated with it. (7 marks)
Answered Same DayFeb 02, 2022

Answer To: ECOM4000 Economics Individual Assignment T3 2021 Kaplan Business School (KBS), Australia 1 Document...

Bidusha answered on Feb 02 2022
117 Votes
COLES AND WOOLSWORTH
Table of Contents
Part A    3
Question 1    3
Question 2    4
Question 3    5
Part B    6
Question 1    6
Question 2    7
Question 3    10
References    11
Part A
Question 1
Woolworths and Coles are both piece of an oligopolistic market structure. Since the market is overwhelmed by a couple of gigantic enterprises that have an extensive piece of the
market, this is a blemished sort of contest. Since these couple of enterprises have restricted rivalry, they can decide to battle against each other or to team up to ensure that everybody in the market benefits. They sell homogeneous items with hardly any qualifications, and they decide the estimating, inferring that the powers of demand and supply little affect costs in this market framework (Roy, et al., 2020). Coles and Woolworths are important for an oligopolistic market. The market share is involved by few enterprises and is exceptionally concentrated in an oligopoly market structure.
Notwithstanding the way that a couple of organizations rule the business, independent companies do exist. Firms in an oligopoly are dependent on each other. Coles and Woolworths work in an oligopolistic market. Since there are a predetermined number of organizations in an oligopoly market, one decisive moves' strength sways the activities of others. Coles and Woolworths represent a huge piece of the Australian retail area's market share. Because of these variables, these two rivals enjoy an extensive benefit. They are oblivious to their rival's conduct and activities. Since there are not many firms in this industry, Coles and Woolworth work in an oligopolistic market.
Question 2
Price assumes a vital part in an oligopoly market; basic value cuts may bring about huge changes. Any organization that raises its pricing without first surveying the market condition hazards being constrained out of the market. To flourish in this market, players should cooperate with their rivals.
Fig 1. Oligopoly Total Revenue Curve
Fig 2. ATC, MC and dd Curve
The demand bend crosses at point b in the above wrinkled demand bend, and the demand bend becomes crimped in an oligopolistic market. There is a ton of contention among market rivals in this area. With regards to the value markdown fight among Woolworths and Coles, their pricing strategies have brought about a great deal of competition. Because of a feeling of dread toward competition, competing businesses are constrained to bring down costs in the expectations that clients would change to different brands (Yang, 2018).
Question 3
    
    WOOLSWORTH
    
    High Price
    Low Price
    COLES
    High Price
    $8000m, $8000m
    $4500m, $9000m
    
    Low Price
    $9000m, $4500m
    $5000m, $5000m
A Nash equilibrium is ($5000m, $5000m). Coles and Woolworths both pick system Low pricing in the Nash equilibrium result. For Coles and Woolworths, the Nash equilibrium outcome is not awesome. The Nash equilibrium is what is going on in which neither of the gatherings has any motivation to change their arrangements.
($8000m, $8000m) is verified whether it is a Nash equilibrium. Coles has a motivating force to change from a high price to a low-price approach to further develop income from $8000 million to $9000 million. Woolworths additionally has a motivator to go from a high price to a low-price approach to improve income from $8000 million to $9000 million. Thus, ($8000m, $8000m) does not address a Nash equilibrium.
($4500m, $9000m) is checked for a Nash equilibrium. Coles has an impetus to go from a high price to a low-price approach to help profit from $4500...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here