FINAL ANALYSIS OF A SELECTED TEST Instructions This assignment, or final course project, is a culmination of the previous assignments you completed during this course and the application of APA...

1 answer below »

FINAL ANALYSIS OF A SELECTED TEST


Instructions


This assignment, or final course project, is a culmination of the previous assignments you completed during this course and the application of APA ethical principles and multicultural assessment practices. In this assignment, you will select one of the three tests you have reviewed in previous assignments and defend your selection based on the synthesize of your previous research. In addition, you will apply APA ethical and multicultural assessment practices to your selected test and propose steps to adhere to these practices in one's specialization or a related profession.


For this final assignment:



  • Select one of the three tests you reviewed for the previous assignments.

    • Defend your decision to select this test over the other two tests based on a synthesis of all the data and information you gathered on your selected test throughout the course.

    • Identify highlights, both positive and negative, both advantages and disadvantages, according to all of the elements researched.



  • Locate research for evidence of fairness and test bias for your selected test.

    • If the research or reviews do not address fairness or test bias in any way, then you will need to cite the references you reviewed and note that they were lacking in addressing fairness or bias, drawing appropriate conclusions for when a test is lacking such evidence.



  • Identify multicultural assessment practices and guidelines that should be followed when administering, scoring, and interpreting your selected test.

  • Apply APA ethical principles on assessment practices (9.01 through 9.11) to your selected test.

    • For each ethical principle, explain how you would follow each principle if you were using your selected test in your specialization or a related profession.





Instructions for the content of the paper are in theu09a1 Assignment Template [DOCX].


Additional Requirements


Your paper should meet the following requirements:




  • References: A minimum of nine references. These may include journal articles, literature reviews, MMY reviews, and publisher websites. At least three of the nine references must be from peer-reviewed journals. It is likely and appropriate that many of these references and citations were included in one or more of your previous assignments. Alternatively, you may want to supplement your paper with current, peer-viewed journal articles you located after completing an earlier assignment. Those inclusions would also be acceptable.


  • Length of paper: At least nine double-spaced pages, not including the title page, abstract, or references.


  • APA format: Current APA format and style is required throughout. Be sure to use the correct format and style for each respective type of reference, for example, website site versus journal). Refer to theAcademic Writerfor guidance.



Note: The articles you need to complete this assignment should be available inside the library collection. In future courses, you may use the Capella library's Interlibrary Loan service to obtain articles outside of the collection, but you should not have to use the service for this course. In the event that you cannot find articles covering a newer test edition, please refer to the List of Tests by Type document in the resources. Note which tests have been designated as acceptable for searching prior test editions.


9 references

Answered 1 days AfterSep 10, 2022

Answer To: FINAL ANALYSIS OF A SELECTED TEST Instructions This assignment, or final course project, is a...

Parul answered on Sep 12 2022
53 Votes
2
Final Analysis of Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children
Patricia Harris
Psy7610, Section 09
(July 11 – September 16, 2022)
Capella University
Dr. Sophia Morales
Introduction
By the virtue of this report, I have performed an extensive analysis on many tests which primarily includes Assessment Battery for Children - Second Edition (KABC-II), Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Fifth Edition (WISC-V), and Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Abilities - Fourth Edition (WJIV: COG). For all these tests, the
targeted population is the same which ranges between the demographic of 6 to 18 years. Essentially, the psychological condition which is required is fundamentally based on the capability of the targeted children population for comprehending visual information and conscious awareness (Bain, S. K., & Gray, R., 2008). This largely includes parameters like concentration, reasoning as well as attention. After carefully reviewing all the tests and comprehending their depth, I feel Kaufman Assessment Battery for the Children - Second Edition is the most effective. Intelligence tests give strong insights into cognition and personality in children which perhaps assess various needs (Bain, S. K., & Gray, R., 2008).
The test that I have selected, Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children-II can administer and effectively measure the cognitive processing abilities of adolescents and children that range between the age group of 3 and 18. It is one of the pioneer tests to be principally created from a deep theoretical basis as well as an intelligence test fundamentally based on neuropsychological theory. This test is specifically curated for evaluating the verbal as well as non-verbal capabilities of the individuals. This contains three subtests like Verbal Knowledge, Riddles as well as Matrices (Baron, I. S., 2018).
Technically, KABC-II tests include two batteries: Core as well as Expanded. While the expanded battery takes into consideration supplementary subtests to enhance the breadth of the construct that is often measured by the Core battery. To strengthen the hypotheses as well as enhance the comparison of the child's initial as well as delayed recall of new learning. This test offer age-based standardized scores, that are equivalent to age as well as ranks of percentile. The research in this course has offered a strong foundation to assess the linkage between the cognitive patterns of strengths and weaknesses. This can offer insights into why children make errors in their communication, verbal, written, maths, and spelling (Baron, I. S., 2018).
Strengths
· KABC-II test allows researchers/clinicians to identify a required model after understanding the uniqueness of the child. Therefore, it offers the flexibility to address the differences present in every child and therefore the tests can be customized accordingly.
· KABC-II test can offer a dimension to factor the background of the child while considering an evaluation of the intelligence. This construct offers the test with deep insights into children's personality, problem-solving, learning, and strategy.
· Thirdly, KABC-II can be regarded as a psychometrically solid instrument and offers a detailed analysis of its reliability and validity. The overall average consistency coefficient is perhaps .95 for the MPI and it ranges for both the age groups 7-18 and ages of 3 to 6 years (Baron, I. S., 2018).
Relevancy to Specialization or a Related Profession
Overall synthesis of research explains that KABC-II is the most prominent test which offers a comprehensive analysis of all the dimensions of the participants. KABC-II can be regarded as one of the strong instruments that can offer focused information on the reliability and validity of the results. Essentially, the average consistency coefficient for KABC-II is 0.95 which is perhaps very high. Furthermore, this score of 0.95 is for the MPI and it is utilized for both the age groups from 3 to 6 years as well as from 7 to 18 years (Carroll, J. B., 2005). For the first group which ranges from 3 to 6 years, the test validity or internal value of consistency lies around 0.96. While on the other hand, for the second group which is for 7 to 18 years the internal consistency ranges from 0.9 to .92. This offers very high reliability and validity of the test that certainly builds trust to leverage this instrument while working on the subject of testing the intelligence of the students. This is because the KABC-II tests are assisted with the factors like co-relational data, clinical group studies as well as deep-down analysis. This test minimizes the differences between the cultural as well as various ethnic groups (Carroll, J. B., 2005).
This test is perhaps one of the most reliable which builds a strong relevance and dependence on this particular method of assessing the intelligence of the child. The validity for MPI for age groups 3 to 5 years is 0.86, and age group of 7 to 12 years is 0.89, and the age group of 13 to 18 years is 0.91. On average, the tests as well as the retest for the coefficient can range from .90 to .91 as well as 0.94 (Flynn, J. R., 1987). The overall validity of the preceding results is assisted by strong backing of data along with...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here