Find and read, the following article: Kelley, H. (1950). The warm-cold variable in first impressions of persons.Journal of Personality, 18 (4),431.439. Write a summary of the article describing the:Independent Variable, Dependent Variable, how the Independent Variable was manipulated, how the Dependent Variable was measured, the theory, the hypothesis, the type of design, the participants, the findings, whether the hypothesis was supported, and any possible confounds that may have impacted the study. Please discuss any ethical considerations, if any, with this study as designed. Is there anything you would’ve done differently? This should be in paragraph form; do not use bullet points or lists. Finally, determine whether this is a between-subjects or within-subjects design (please state your decision) andconsider whether you could convert the design to the opposing design. Why or why not? (For example, if you decide the design is a between-subjects design, then consider whether you could convert it to a within-subjects design. Ifyou decide the design is a within-subjects design, then consider whether you could convert it to a between-subjects design.) NOTE: You are not expected to understand the tables/statistics right now; you do not need that information to address these questions. There is a non-statistical explanation of the findings within the article.

Find and read, the following article: Kelley, H XXXXXXXXXXThe warm-cold variable in first impressions of persons.Journal of Personality, 18 (4),431.439. Write a summary of the article describing...

Find and read, the following article: Kelley, H. (1950). The warm-cold variable in first impressions of persons.Journal of Personality, 18 (4),431.439.

Write a summary of the article describing the:Independent Variable, Dependent Variable, how the Independent Variable was manipulated, how the Dependent Variable was measured, the theory, the hypothesis, the type of design, the participants, the findings, whether the hypothesis was supported, and any possible confounds that may have impacted the study. Please discuss any ethical considerations, if any, with this study as designed. Is there anything you would’ve done differently? This should be in paragraph form; do not use bullet points or lists. Finally, determine whether this is a between-subjects or within-subjects design (please state your decision) andconsider whether you could convert the design to the opposing design. Why or why not? (For example, if you decide the design is a between-subjects design, then consider whether you could convert it to a within-subjects design. Ifyou decide the design is a within-subjects design, then consider whether you could convert it to a between-subjects design.)

NOTE: You are not expected to understand the tables/statistics right now; you do not need that information to address these questions. There is a non-statistical explanation of the findings within the article.

Oct 10, 2021