First I submitted the assignment on XXXXXXXXXXthen the essay that was given at the time was rejected with feedback twice. the guy was improving in every feedback. then I submitted the last solution...

1 answer below »

First I submitted the assignment on 115918. then the essay that was given at the time was rejected with feedback twice. the guy was improving in every feedback. then I submitted the last solution which is attached above. then they gave me feedback again. u guys can see on the screenshots there are 3 red parts that need to be improved. so, for this new expert to understand he has to see the instructions first on 115918 to fully understand. then he has to come back to the above attached solution to improve the points that are mentioned on the screenshots
Answered 1 days AfterJan 16, 2023

Answer To: First I submitted the assignment on XXXXXXXXXXthen the essay that was given at the time was rejected...

Deblina answered on Jan 17 2023
39 Votes
6
Name: Mensur Ahemed
Course: IT Leadership Foundations - D194
Professor: Candice Allen
Date: 01/13/2023
Contents
3Strategies
3Outcomes
4Effectiveness of communication strategies
4Informal leader
4Overall interpersonal dynamics
5Plan
7Work Cited
Strategies
As the new Implementation Team Lead for Seamus Company, there are a few crucial actions you can take to ensure the successful launch of the
company-wide equipment upgrading project in terms of leadership tactics.
· Clearly define your objectives and expectations
· Create a solid project plan (Nicola, Maria, et al).
· Be an effective communicator.
· Set a good example.
· Encourage your troops.
· Provide suggestions and assistance
· An update meeting.
In the follow-up meeting, we may assess the team's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats using tools like the SWOT analysis or decision matrix and then take the appropriate action. Overall, we can overcome any challenges that may develop throughout the equipment upgrading process and eventually assure its success by effectively communicating with and managing your team.
Outcomes
The initiative to improve the equipment was addressed, as well as prospective pilot teams who may be chosen for the project. It seems, nevertheless, that the group was unable to decide which team to choose as the pilot team. It is unknown how closely the meeting adhered to the agenda because it is not mentioned in the material given. Conflicts arose throughout the conference due to Li's preference for delaying choices until all data is available and Diego's preference for responsiveness and quickness over waiting for more study. Mei also contributed to the tensions by being slower to react and more careful since she wants to be fair and satisfy everyone.
Effectiveness of communication strategies
The exact scenario, target audience, and communication goals may all affect how effective a communication strategy is. Being clear and succinct, employing active listening, and adjusting your communication style to the audience are some effective techniques. The message being sent can also be strengthened by incorporating nonverbal clues like body language, tone of voice, and eye contact. It's also critical to consider the communication channel, since each has advantages and disadvantages, whether it's face-to-face, over the phone, or through digital media. The material given makes no mention of the meeting's communication tactics' efficacy. However, it's possible that each person employed a distinct approach to communicating, which may have had an impact on the meeting's conclusion. Choice-making may have been hampered by communication tactics, as seen by the hazy decision over which team should serve as the pilot team.
The communication strategies used by the members in the meeting were intense. Some of the team members used a more aggressive strategy as compared to the others.
Li used clear concise and put forward her views in a clarified manner. She was calm and had expressed effective non-verbal communication that convinced her views in taking the decision. She was clear with her perception and positively contributed towards the meeting.
Mei was intensely aggravated with her views. She deliberately showed her conflict with Diego. She was quite intense in her verbal and non-verbal presentation and convinced the team members about her perception.
Diego effectively presented his perception without letting the other participants in the meeting to be distracted and consciously focusing on pacifying their internal commentary is a comprehensive communication strategy.
Kamal had effective communication skills along clear verbal adequacy is also an inherent consideration of the communication strategy. Understanding the requirements of his audience and adapting his content and delivery in accordance with those demands, in general, was the key to good communication.
It is effective to note in this aspect that the aggressive approach by members like Mei and Diego is quite inherent to focus on the other person and influence their...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here