For Questions 12-17: A researcher is interested in treatment of infants with plagiocephaly. He enrolled 100 infants with plagiocephaly and randomized them to one of three groups: Group 1 – Received...

1 answer below »

For Questions 12-17: A researcher is interested in treatment of infants with plagiocephaly. He enrolled 100 infants with plagiocephaly and randomized them to one of three groups:


Group 1 – Received standard care (helmeting at 4 months)


Group 2 – Received weekly parent education sessions focused on tummy time and safe sleep


Group 3 – Received soft tissue manual therapy by an occupational therapist


The researcher evaluated the success of the interventions by measuring transcranial diameter difference (TDD) at 6 months. The researcher tested the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variances and both assumptions were met. Here is the SPSS output:







































































Descriptives



TDD




N



Mean



Std. Deviation



Std. Error



95% Confidence Interval for Mean



Minimum



Maximum



Lower Bound



Upper Bound



1.00



33



.6788



.22327



.03887



.5996



.7580



.20



1.00



2.00



33



.4667



.29545



.05143



.3619



.5714



.00



.90



3.00



34



.6471



.19107



.03277



.5804



.7137



.20



.90



Total



100



.5980



.25544



.02554



.5473



.6487



.00



1.00














































ANOVA



TDD




Sum of Squares



df



Mean Square



F



Sig.



Between Groups



.866



2



.433



7.513



.001



Within Groups



5.593



97



.058





Total



6.460



99







Post Hoc Tests


















































































Multiple Comparisons



Dependent Variable: TDD



Tukey HSD



(I) Treatment



(J) Treatment



Mean Difference (I-J)



Std. Error



Sig.



95% Confidence Interval



Lower Bound



Upper Bound



1.00



2.00



.21212*



.05912



.002



.0714



.3528



3.00



.03173



.05868



.851



-.1079



.1714



2.00



1.00



-.21212*



.05912



.002



-.3528



-.0714



3.00



-.18039*



.05868



.008



-.3201



-.0407



3.00



1.00



-.03173



.05868



.851



-.1714



.1079



2.00



.18039*



.05868



.008



.0407



.3201



*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.



1. The SPSS output above shows that the researcher ran an ANOVA. Why would the researcher chose to run an ANOVA instead of running multiple t-tests to compare the three groups? (5 points)


2. What is the null hypothesis being tested? (5 points)


3. What is the F value from this analysis? (5 points)


4. What is the p value from the ANOVA analysis? (5 points)


5. Would you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis? (5 points)


6. Using both the ANOVA output table and the Multiple Comparisons post hoc table, what conclusion would you make? (10 points)

Answered Same DayDec 27, 2021

Answer To: For Questions 12-17: A researcher is interested in treatment of infants with plagiocephaly. He...

David answered on Dec 27 2021
108 Votes
1. The SPSS output above shows that the researcher ran an ANOVA. Why would the
researcher chose to
run an ANOVA instead of running multiple t-tests to compare the
three groups? (5 points)
For comparing means between 3 or more groups one way ANOVA is used. To test
which pair differs significantly I use Post Hoc analysis (turkey crammer test).
Running multiple t test to compare 3 groups is not easy and comfortable. Running...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here