Hello there, I have attached files which include the guidelines, rubric, two examples of assignment and the previous assigment.I just want you to give this assignment to same expert who did my...

1 answer below »
Hello there, I have attached files which include the guidelines, rubric, two examples of assignment and the previous assigment.I just want you to give this assignment to same expert who did my assignment order number 39212. Because it is the second step of previous assignment.Can you please make my conversation with the expert ASAP because it is very important to tell the expert about the tutor's feedbacks.this link is very helpfull to know how to do qulitative research. http://toolkit.pellinstitute.org/evaluation-guide/analyze/analyze-qualitative-data/?tab=step-4-identifying-meaningful-patterns-and-themes



Assessment 2 - Project Report This is an individual, written assessment, to be completed in report format. You are required to write around 3,000 words (+/- 10%), excluding title page, preliminaries, tables, figures, reference list and appendices. The report requires in-text referencing and a full reference list in APA style, with evidence that you have critically read and integrated a minimum of 30 suitable scholarly references. The purpose of this assessment is to present the final report of the Professional Project you proposed in Assignment 1. This report should build upon both components of your Assessment 1 and it should be developed with the help of the tutor/co-ordinator feedback. In order to successfully complete Assessment 2, you are required to carry out the investigation you have proposed in Assessment 1 and produce a professional research report that shows that you have followed through from finding a research question to answering that question and developing recommendations that arise from your findings. The report will follow the typical structure of a research report and will need to include the following: · Project title · Introduction (which must include some justification of your topic and your project's aim and research question(s)) · Critical literature review · A detailed presentation of how you carried out your project (commensurate with a 'Methods' chapter) · Findings from your secondary data analysis · Discussion of findings in light of your previously reviewed literature · Conclusion, including recommendations and limitations Assessment criteria (Open rubric file for a detailed marking rubric): · Title, background, definitions · Justification, aim and objectives/research questions · Quality and coherence of introduction and conclusion · Critical literature review · Methods · Findings and analysis · Discussion · Written communication · Quality and appropriateness of references, and accuracy of referencing BUSN20019 ASSESSMENT 2 – MARKING RUBRIC In case of high Turnitin similarity scores, markers analyse the similarity score on a case by case basis and you will see relevant comments in your assignment, if necessary. If high similarity derived purely from reference lists and/or the fact that you may have copied the assessment brief into your submission, no comments are made as you can find this information out yourself by exploring the similarity score on your Turnitin report. Late submission penalties are being applied to this assignment as per the university regulations. Any students deemed to have conducted Academic Misconduct are being reported and will be informed of the outcome of the investigation and any related penalties via their student email address. Criteria 0 (Not Shown) 1 (Poor) 2 (Unsatisfactory) 3 (Satisfactory) 4 (Good) 5 (Very Good) 6 (Excellent) 1. Title, background, definition, justification, aim and RQs 10% Entirely inconsistent and/or largely missing. Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic OR too vague Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic OR too vague Title, background, definition, justification, aim and RQs present; may be inconsistent but generally presented in an effective manner Title, background, definition & justification present; may be slightly inconsistent but generally presented in a convincing manner Title, background, definition, justification, aim and RQs present; generally consistent and presented in a highly competent manner Title, background, definition, justification, aim and RQs present; ALL are consistent and presented in a superior manner 2. Critical literature review 10% Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic Work presented is not suitable as a LR and/or it is incomplete and/or inappropriate for the topic. Work presented is not suitable as a LR and/or it is incomplete and/or inappropriate for the topic. Effective review of a limited amount of suitable literature; effective structure; may be overly descriptive Convincing review of an acceptable amount of suitable literature; well structured; may not be critical throughout Highly competent review of a justifiably good amount of suitable literature; very well structured; generally critical and may clearly identify gaps to be addressed Superior review of a justifiably good amount of suitable literature; excellent structure; critical throughout; clearly identifies gaps to be addressed 3. Methods 20% Entire section or large parts thereof missing OR entirely unsuitable content. Somewhat incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic. No actual data collected or analysed. Slightly incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic. No actual data collected or analysed. Effective presentation of how the secondary material was identified and analysed; identification or analysis may be very superficial; basic methodological literature may be included Convincing presentation of how the secondary material was identified and analysed; both identification and analysis are addressed more than superficially Highly competent presentation of how the secondary material was identified and analysed; both identification and analysis are addressed in detail; some methodological literature included Superior presentation of how the secondary material was identified and analysed; both identification and analysis are addressed in detail to enable replication; excellent integration of methodological literature 4. Findings and Analysis 20% Missing OR insufficiently presents OR inappropriate for the study. Mostly insufficiently presents OR inappropriate for the study and/or overly basic analysis and/or unclear findings. Slightly insufficiently presents OR slightly inappropriate for the study and/or overly basic analysis and/or unclear findings. Effective presentation of findings; structure may be illogical, findings may not be fully consistent with aim and RQs and/or secondary sources may not be fully referenced Convincing presentation of findings; logical structure, generally consistent with aim and RQs and secondary sources are generally referenced Highly competent presentation of findings; very good structure; consistent with aim and RQs and secondary sources may not be fully referenced Superior presentation of findings; excellent structure; fully consistent with aim and RQs; excellent integration of fully referenced secondary sources 5. Discussion 10% Missing OR insufficiently presents OR inappropriate for the study. No clear discussion of findings in light of literature; no clear link back to the references from the LR. No clear discussion of findings in light of literature; no clear link back to the references from the LR. Effective discussion of findings with reference to the literature reviewed; incomplete discussion and/or illogical structure and/or may not be fully consistent; uncritical. Literature may not be referenced again. Convincing discussion of findings with reference to the literature reviewed; complete discussion and logical structure; generally consistent; may lack criticality; Some literature is referenced again. Highly competent and generally critical discussion of findings in light of the literature reviewed; complete discussion and logical structure; consistent. Literature is referenced again. Superior and critical discussion of findings in light of the literature reviewed; complete discussion and logical structure; highly consistent. Literature is referenced again. 6. Quality and coherence of introduction and conclusion 10% Missing OR insufficiently presents OR inappropriate for the study. Incomplete and/or highly inconsistent. Conclusion does not address the RQs from the introduction. Incomplete and/or inconsistent. Conclusion does not properly address the RQs from the introduction. Effective and reasonably clear introduction and conclusion; may ignore aspects of recommendation, limitation or further research; uncritical Convincing and clear introduction and conclusion; considers recommendation, limitation and further research; may lack criticality Highly competent and clear introduction and conclusion; integrates consistent recommendation, limitation and further research; generally critical Superior introduction and conclusion; excellent integration of consistent recommendation, limitation and further research; critical throughout 7. Written communication 10% Incomprehensible OR entirely incorrect writing OR highly unprofessional presentation of written work. Very poor writing with only few sentences readable and/or unsuitable writing style and/or not proofread; OR very unprofessional presentation of written work. Poor writing with a majority of sentences unreadable and/or unsuitable writing style and/or not properly proofread; OR slightly unprofessional presentation of written work. Satisfactory writing that is reasonably readable and suitable for formal business communications; more proofreading required. Generally professional in presentation of work. Good writing that is generally readable and suitable for formal business communications; more proofreading required. Professional presentation of work. Very good writing that is readable and suitable for formal business communications; minor improvements are feasible. Very professional presentation of work. Superior writing that is highly readable and highly suitable for formal business communications; extensive proofreading completed. Very professional presentation of work. 8. Quality and appropriateness of references, and accuracy of referencing 10% No use of the APA referencing system in the assignment, or the reference list; OR no appropriate references used; OR highly inaccurate referencing. Very poor use of the APA referencing system in the body of the assignment and/or in the reference list; OR mostly inappropriate references used. Unsatisfactory use of the APA referencing system in the body of the assignment and/or in the reference list; OR a number of inappropriate references used. NOTE: submissions with less than 20 peer-reviewed articles will not achieve a pass grade on this criterion even if the referencing style is accurate. Satisfactory use of the APA referencing system in the body of the assignment and in the reference list; 20 peer-reviewed articles used; mistakes and/or omissions present. Competent use of the APA referencing system in the body of the assignment and in the reference list; generally correctly cited sources (of which 20 or more are peer-reviewed) but small omissions and/or errors of judgment may be present. Very good use of the APA referencing system in the body of the assignment and in the reference list with almost entirely correctly cited sources (of which 20 or more are peer-reviewed). Faultless use of the APA referencing system in the body of the assignment and in the reference list with completely correctly cited sources. Extensive body of peer-reviewed sources used (i.e. every claim is supported). BUSN20019 ASSESSMENT 2 – MARKING RUBRIC In case of high Turnitin similarity scores, m arkers analyse the similarity score on a case by case basis and you will see relevant comments in your assignment, if necessary. If high similarity derived purely from reference lists a nd/or the fact that you ma y have copied the assessment brief into your submission, no comments are made as you can find this infor mation out yourself by exploring the similarit y score on your Turnitin report. Late submission penalties are being applied to this assignment as per the university regulations. Any students deemed to have conducted Academic Misconduct are being reported an d will be informed of the outcome of the investigation and any related penalties via their student email address. Criteria 0 (Not Shown) 1 (Poor) 2 (Unsatisfactory) 3 (Satisfactory) 4 ( Good ) 5 ( Very Good) 6 (Excellent ) 1. Title, background, definition, justification, aim and RQs 1 0% Entirely inconsistent and/or largely missing. Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic OR too vague Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic OR too vague Title, background, definition, justification, aim and RQs present; may be inconsistent but generally presented in an effective manner Title, background, definition & justification present; may be
Answered Same DayMay 13, 2021BUSN20019Central Queensland University

Answer To: Hello there, I have attached files which include the guidelines, rubric, two examples of assignment...

Soumi answered on May 21 2021
126 Votes
THE INFLUENCE OF WORKFORCE HEALTH AND SAFETY TOWARDS EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION IN MINING INDUSTRIES OF AUSTRALIA
(
THE INFLUENCE OF
WORKFORCE
HEALTH AND SAFETY
TOWARDS EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION IN MINING INDUSTRIES OF AUSTRALIA
)
Table of Contents
Executive Summary    3
1.0 Introduction    3
1.1 Background and Problem Statement    3
1.2 Research Aim    4
1.3 Research Questions    4
2.0 Critical Literature Review    4
2.1 Reasons for Accidents and Health Issues in Mining Employees    4
2.2 Factors of Employee Satisfaction in Mining Industry    5
2.3 Factors of Employee Performance in Mining Industry    5
2.4 Ways to Improve Mining Employee Satisfaction and Subsequent Performance    6
3.0 Methodology    7
3.1 Research Plan    7
3.2 Data Collection    7
3.2.1 Sampling Size, Population and Approach    7
4.0 Discussion and Findings    8
RQ 1: What is the status of health and safety standards in the mining industry in Australia?    8
4.1 Theme 1: Risk of Health and Safety in Australian Mining Industry    8
4.1.1 Su
b-Theme 1: Lack of Health Incentives    8
4.1.2 Sub-Theme 2: Lack of Medical Aids    9
4.1.3 Sub-Theme 3: Lack of Safe Infrastructure    9
4.2 Theme 2: Role of Stakeholders in Maintaining Health and Safety in Australian Mining Industry    9
4.2.1 Sub-Theme 1: Employers    9
4.2.2 Sub-Theme 2: Employees    10
4.2.3 Sub-Theme 3: Government    10
4.2.4 Sub-Theme 4: Customers    10
    RQ 2:How health and safety standards regulate employee satisfaction among mining employees in Australia?    10
4.3 Theme 3: Performance    11
4.3.1 Sub-Theme 1: Effectiveness of Health and Safety Initiatives    11
4.3.2 Sub-Theme 2: Employee Performance    11
4.3.3 Sub-Theme 3: Employee Satisfaction    11
6.0 Conclusion    12
6.2 Recommendations    12
6.3 Limitations    13
7.0 References    14
8.0 Appendix – 1    17
Executive Summary
    The current research attempts to explore the impact of workplace health and safety provisions towards the mining employees and their impact on their satisfaction levels, controlling their performance. The current research starts with the introductory chapter, where the background of the research, the problem statement, aim, objectives and the questions are described. In the following chapter, relevant literary aspects of the study have been discussed in details, followed by the methodology chapter, which gives a brief idea about the related aspects of the research topic variables. In the discussion and finding chapter, the two major research questions are positioned under which themes have been placed, which yields answers to their respective research questions. Based on the research questions and their related themes, finally a proper conclusion is drawn, along with recommendations for further improvements. It is noteworthy that in the conclusion chapter, the limitations of the conducted research are also mentioned, which makes the research all the more realistic and engrossing.
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Background and Problem Statement
    In Australia, the large number of mines, contributing in the mining industry has made the business profitable and the potential of higher earnings is dependent on the huge quantities of deposits remains in the mining zones. Considering the declining demand and the increasing competition in the local and international markets, the mines are in need of cheap labour for higher extraction, for which employee retention is needed and employee retention comes from employee satisfaction.
It is found that the health and safety provisions at workplaces, gives employees work satisfaction and reduced employee turnover. The risks generated from both, accidents and heat as well as fumes-oriented health issues has been considered as occupational hazards of the mining industry. However, with the use of automation and higher investment has given scope for better health and safety provisions at mining site employees, although has not being able to stop the occurrence of accidents or development of health hazards entirely (Department of Mines, Industry Regulations and Safety, 2018).
    On the other hand, it is also found the previous researches have been conducted on issues relating to Australian mining industry, the health hazards, as mentioned in the work of Joy (2004) and the social issues with mining-oriented locality relocation, as observed by Harvey and Brereton (2005). However, the impact of workplace health and safety has not been discussion as a factor for employee satisfaction, which has current significance in the industry for its condition and selected as the chosen topic for the project. The main concern that is raised in the project is shown as the inability of avoiding accidents and health issues, hindering employee satisfaction in mining industry in a context, which requires employee satisfaction, for better performance.
1.2 Research Aim
    The aim of the current research is to assess critically the impact of health and safety at the workplace on the employee satisfaction, within the mining industry in Australia.
1.3 Research Questions
    The following are the research questions—
· What is the status of health and safety standards in the mining industry in Australia?
· How health and safety standards regulate employee satisfaction among mining employees in Australia?
2.0 Critical Literature Review
2.1 Reasons for Accidents and Health Issues in Mining Employees
    One of the major reasons for accident and health issues among mining employees has been considered the outcome of lower ethical standards. As mentioned by Mactaggart, McDermott, Tynan and Gericke (2018), in mines, due to lower ethical standards, substance abuse is allowed by the management, considering the intoxication of the employee as a means of attaining higher profit as intoxication reduces the fatigue of the employees, making them capable of performing better.
The lack of knowledge of mental fatigue is considered another reason of accidents and health issues among mining employee. As stated by O’Mullan, Debattista and Keen-Dyer (2018), mining employees, in most cases come from lower section of the society, which make them less educated, leading to limited knowledge about mental fatigue and its long-term impact. As the mining employees work under heat and high pressure, environment, the mental condition degradation leads to accidents and health issues.
    The lower quality of health and safety standards abided in mines has also been considered to be a reason for health and safety issues among the mine employees. As affirmed by Xingwana, Smith and Mazibuko (2019), the mining employees get safety and health precautions while working at the mines, thereby making it clear that the absence of precaution is not the reason for accidents and health issues, but their standards are.
Contrasting with the provided reasons, Frederiksen (2018), argue that breaches of the precautions are the reasons for accidents and health issues and the employees are responsible themselves. As opined by Etteh (2018), health and safety standards will not be able to stop accidents and health issues, as it is a part of the occupational hazard of the mining industry.
2.2 Factors of Employee Satisfaction in Mining Industry
    Giving more importance to the nature of mining job and the risk that is associated with it; arguments have been mounting on the inference that employees in mining industry have naturally lower job satisfaction, which contributes to lower performance and high turnover. As mentioned by Macfarlane (2018), mining is a difficult and risky task to perform and therefore, employees very often get injured or develop health issues, which hinders their satisfaction and increase the chance of employee turnover.
On the contrary, Wegenast, Krauser, Struver and Giesen (2019) argued that employees, who work in the mines are aware of the risks and health hazards, therefore, they cannot be the reason of their dissatisfaction, instead it is the safety provisions provided for them and their quality that determine their satisfaction levels. On the other hand, taking a completely different approach, Street, Lacey and Somoray (2019) opined that the paid wages are the core factor that regulates the degree of employee satisfaction.
2.3 Factors of Employee Performance in Mining Industry
    The employee performance, especially those engaged in the mining activities, depend largely on the degree of attachment they develop with their respective organisations. As stated by Boiral, Heras-Saizarbitoria and Brotherton (2019), the more an employee is attached to his or her mining company and its management, the higher performance it would provide, as attachment with the company creates dedicative mentality on the part of the mining employees. However, Friedman, Almberg and Cohen (2019), argued that employees in the mining industry had to undergo extreme physical labour, which generates high exhaustion, and fatigue.
This brings down the performance drastically and as the employees become older or continue mining for longer period, the performance degrades. According to Bonsu, Van Dyk, Franzidis, Petersen and Isafiade (2016), mining employees at mines do not get proper safety and health benefits due to the nature of the job as well as carelessness of the employers, which makes their satisfaction lower and performance slower. Botha and Cronje (2015) opined that employees in mining industry do not get much social importance as they are considered to be the lower part of the social order, which makes them more prone to not only leave their respective organisations but also leave the industry as well.
2.4 Ways to Improve Mining Employee Satisfaction and Subsequent Performance
    The nature of work, the risk associated, the hazards involved in mining process cannot be changed, however, there are ways, through which employee satisfaction can be increased, which would cast direct impact on the degree of employee performance. As suggested by...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here