Hey i just need a report of about 1500 words . But i need it in 24 hrs.
12:41 CO: Eo [el I El) ww apicoliege sduau @apiC ASIA PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE Assessment 4 Marking Criteria and Rubric Assessment 4: Report and Oral Defence Due date: Week 11 Group/individual: Group Word count/Time provided: 3000 words Weighting: 40% Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO1, ULO2, ULO3, ULO4 Assessment 4 Detail Assessment 4: Report and Oral Defence Students prepare and the Project Design, Feasibility Analysis, and Initial Implementation Plan and present and defend their solution design through an oral defence. Assessments 4 Marking Criteria and Rubric The assessment will be marked out of 40 and will be weighted 40% of the total unit mark. The marking criteria and rubric are shown on the following page. Melbourne le Street www.apicollege.edu.au F® NN © Dashboard Calendar To Do Notifications Inbox 12:42 BIS3003_Assessmen... Phone: +61 Melbourne 399 Lonsdale Street Melbourne VIC 3000 all programs@apicollege edu.au picollege edu au @apic Assessment 4 Marking Criteria and Rubric Q ¢ O www.apicollege.edu.au give a clear idea of the business case and final functional and non- though the expected outcomes of the project clearly need reflect a few changes in project scope. reflect some changes in project scope. reflect most changes in project scope. Marking Criteria Not Satisfactory Satisfactory Good Very Good Excellent (0-49% of the (50-64% of the (65-74% of the criterion | (75-84% of the criterion (85-100% of the criterion mark) criterion mark) mark) mark) criterion mark) Criterion (2.5 marks) | The Vision has not | The Vision has been | The Vision has been The Vision has been | The Vision has been Does the revised Vision | been updated even | partially updated to | updated to updated to thoroughly updated to reflect any and all changes in project scope. Does the revised requirement model clearly define the functional, non- functional, and data requirements for the project? Feasibility Analysis The requirement model has not been updated even though the functional, non- functional, and data requirements for the project clearly need to be revised. and present and justified their solution. The requirement model provided with an explanation. . The requirement model has been thoroughly updated to reflect any and few changes in functional, non- functional, and data requirements for the justified their solution. The requirement model provided with an explanation. . The requirement model has been thoroughly updated to reflect some changes in functional, non- functional, and data requirements for the their solution . The requirement model provided with an explanation. . The requirement model has been thoroughly updated to changes in functional, non- functional, and data requirements for the functional to be revised. requirements of the project Criterion (2.5 marks) | Report hasn't Reporting Reporting demonstrates | Reporting demonstrates | Reporting demonstrates Does the report provide a demonstrates the competent or basic high-level skills in highly advanced skills in demonstrate the skills | demonstration about | basic skills in skills in Feasibility Feasibility Analysis, and | Feasibility Analysis, and in Feasibility Analysis? | the skills in Feasibility Analysis, | Analysis, and present and | present and justified | present and justified their solution. The requirement model provided with an explanation. The requirement model has been thoroughly updated to reflect any and all changes in functional, non- functional, and data requirements for the project? syonny Be on picotegesduau Criterion (2.5 marks) | Report hasn't Reporting Reporting demonstrates | Reporting demonstrates | Reporting demonstrates Does the report provide a demonstrates the competent or basic high-level skills in Initial | highly advanced skills in demonstrate the skills in Initial Implementation Plan? Does the revised Master Test Plan clearly indicate the overall testing strategy, the priority, level of effort, basic techniques, and coverage to be achieved in each type of testing, as well as acceptance and remediation procedures? demonstration about the skills in Initial Implementation Plan. The master test plan does not set out a reasonable plan for testing. basic skills in Initial Implementation Plan and present and justified their solution The initial plan provided with an explanation. The master test plan sets out a plan for testing during the remaining development. skills in Initial Implementation Plan and present and justified their solution. The initial plan provided with an explanation. The master test plan sets out a prioritised, reasonable and achievable plan for testing during the remaining development. Implementation Plan and present and justified their solution. The initial plan provided with an explanation. The master test plan sets out a good quality, prioritised, justified, reasonable and achievable plan for testing during the remaining development. The master test plan sets outa prioritised, reasonable and achievable plan for testing during the remaining development. Initial Implementation Plan and present and justified their solution . The initial plan provided with an explanation. The master test plan sets out avery high quality, well thought out, clearly prioritised, well justified, reasonable and achievable plan for testing during the remaining development. Criterion (2.5 marks) Does the report demonstrate the skills in Project Design? Does the revised executable Architectural of your project clearly identified? Report hasn't provide a demonstration about the skills in Project Design Reporting demonstrates the basic skills in Project Design, present and justified their solution Reporting demonstrates competent or basic skills in Project Design, present and justified their solution Reporting demonstrates high-level skills in Project Design, present and justified their solution. The executable architecture implements the proposed architecture, Reporting demonstrates highly advanced skills in Project Design, present and justified their solution . The fully implements the proposed architecture, with no missing syanay (D Dashboard ooo ooo Calendar To Do E® nN Notifications Xd Inbox 12:42 BIS3003_Assessmen @apic with no elements. significant elements po The goals and Some goals thatthe | Several goals that the ‘Almost goals that the | All goals that the Does the proposed philosophies haven't | architecture needs to | architecture needs to architecture needsto | architecture needs to architecture formulate explained meet in its structure meet in its structure and meet in its structure meet in its structure and set of goals and and behaviour , and behaviour , and and behaviour , and behaviour , and describes the philosophies well philosophies well philosophies well philosophies well philosophy? explained. The Issues | explained. The Issues explained. The Issues explained. The Issues that drive the that drive the philosophy | that drive the that drive the philosophy identified | identified philosophy identified | philosophy identified. Criterion (2marks) The critical Some critical Several critical ‘Almost critical ‘All critical architecturally Does the proposed architecturally architecturally architecturally significant | architecturally significant requirements architecture identified | significant significant requirements correctly | significant requirements | correctly identified and and link to the requirements not requirements identified and link to the | correctly identified and | link to the requirements requirements ? correctly identified | correctly identified requirements that must | link to the requirements | that must be and link to the be implemented to that must be implemented to realize requirements that realize the architecture. implemented to realize | the architecture. must be implemented the architecture. to realize the architecture. Criterion (2 marks) The list of the A comprehensive list | A comprehensive listof | A comprehensive list of | A comprehensive list of Does the proposed assumptions and of the assumptions | the assumptions and the assumptionsand | the assumptions and architecture listed the | dependencies not | and dependencies, | dependencies , and list of | dependencies , and list | dependencies , and list assumptions and provided. and list of decisions decisions and constraints | of decisions and of decisions and dependencies that and constraints identified. Decisions constraints identified. constraints identified. drive architectural identified. Decisions | completely consistent Decisions completely | Decisions completely i. — — @apic decisions? Does the completely consistent | with goals and Consistent with goals | consistent with goals proposed architecture with goals and philosophies, sensible, | and philosophies, and philosophies, Listed the decisions philosophies, sensible, | and well justified with sensible, and well sensible, and well that have been made? and well justified with | reference to specific justified with reference | justified with reference reference to specific | needs of project. to specific needs of to specific needs of needs of project. project. project. Criterion (2 marks) The architectural Some architectural Several architectural Almost the architectural | All the architectural Does the proposed mechanisms are not | mechanisms are listed | mechanisms are listed mechanisms are listed mechanisms are listed architecture described listed . and described the and described the and described the and described the the mechanisms? current state of each current state of each one. current state of each current state of each one. Mechanisms Mechanisms related to one. Mechanisms one. Mechanisms related to architecturally significant | related to related to architecturally architecturally requirements. architecturally significant requirements. significant significant requirements. requirements. Crit n (12 marks) All features to be | Some features to be | Several features to be | Almost features to be | All features to be tested, Does the test plan give tested, features not | tested, features not to | tested, features not to be | tested, features not to | features not to be a clear idea of the to be tested, | be tested, resource | tested, resource | be tested, resource | tested, resource acceptance testing? resource requirements, testing | requirements, testing | requirements, testing | requirements, testing requirements, schedule, test writing, | schedule, test writing, | schedule, test writing, | schedule, test writing, testing schedule, test | test coverage, test test coverage, test | test coverage, test |test coverage, test writing, test | deliverables, pre- | deliverables, pre- | deliverables, pre- | deliverables, pre- coverage, test | requisite for test | requisite for test | requisite for test | requisite for test deliverables, pre | execution, bug | execution, bug reporting | execution, bug | execution, bug reporting requisite for test | reporting and tracking | and tracking mechanism, | reporting and tracking | and tracking mechanism, execution, bug | mechanism, test | test metrics identified in | mechanism, test | test metrics identified in reporting and | metrics identified in | the test plan. metrics identified in | the test plan. tracking mechanism, | the test plan. the test plan. i. — — ® nn = Dashboard Calendar To Do Notifications Inbox 12:42 BIS3003_Assessmen syoney Mabcume ow spcaiegesduau ®aric test metrics identified in the test plan. Criterion (2.5 marks) There is no Logical Audience cannot Audience has difficulty Presents information in | Presents information in Logical sequence and | sequence understand following presentation | logical sequence that | logical, interesting ease of presentation. some of the because student jumps | the audience can follow | sequence that the Use of available time presentation around but is close to and delivered close to audience can easily and overall organisation because thereisno | being on time. time given. follow and delivered on of the seminar. sequence of time. information and either falls short or goes over the time limit. Criterion (5 marks) Audience Demonstrates justa | Demonstrates comfort | Demonstrates ease with | Demonstrates full Audience engagement | engagement and basic does grasp of with explanations, but explanations and willing | knowledge (more than and interest terest haven't information about the | fails to elaborate at times | to elaborate at times in | required) with maintained. Expertise | maintained project throughout in the report. the report, explanations and and ability is shown to the report; Student elaboration of the justify results and reads all of report with | Student occasionally uses | Student maintains eye | project in the report; conclusions to peers. no eye contact or the | eye contact, but still contact most of the video sounds like a reads most of report from | time but frequently Maintains eye contact prepared speech. notes or the screen. returns to notes. with audience or the camera, Student mumbles or | Student's voice is low. Student's voice is clear. | seldom returning to incorrectly Student Student pronounces notes. pronounces terms, incorrectly pronounces | most words correctly. and speaks too quietly | terms. Most audience Student uses a clear audience members or | Audience members or members or viewers voice that all audience members or viewers can syonny Be on picotegesduau Viewers to hear. viewers have difficulty | can hear the hear the presentation. hearing all the presentation. presentation. Criterion (2.5marks) | The questions were | Cannot answer all Able to answer only Answers to all Answers all questions Audience Interaction | handled questions rudimentary questions | questions, but fails to | with detailed and Impact Skills about subject. from the audience. elaborate at times. explanations and How well the questions elaboration. were handled in the ‘live seminar. sya Mauna ® nn = Dashboard Calendar To Do Notifications Inbox