Hi, i have attached a file with this email. Please go through every detail and let me know the qoute for it. As my proffesor is very particular about everything mentioned.
09/10/2020 Assignment-2: Research Proposal (week 12) https://rmit.instructure.com/courses/64886/assignments/485864 1/7 Assignment-2: Research Proposal (week 12) Due 18 Oct by 23:59 Points 100 Submitting a file upload File types pdf Attempts 0 Allowed attempts 2 Available until 25 Oct at 23:59 Submit Assignment Dear Research Methods for Engineers (EEET2449) students This is your Assignment-2 (Research Proposal), which should be submitted in week 12. There could be two types of proposals: - For experimental Materials/Devices - based research (tangible) - For Modelling/Algorithm - based research (intangible). According to this, there are two types of Experimental sections - you only need one section in your proposal - chose the one that is relevant to your type of proposed research. If you chose to have an experimental validation to your model/algorithm you could add this as well, but not as detailed as in materials/devices proposals. Please just outline this in the evaluation/validation proposition. Your Research Proposal should contain the following sections (points allocated to each section): Title (2pt) Abstract (10pt) Introduction(12pt) Significance (Rationale) Connection to the current body of knowledge Gap/s leading to need for your project Aim, Expected Outcomes and Research Questions (16pt) Study Design/Approach (20pt) Experimental (for proposed Materials-Centred Study): Materials, Instruments and Methods (24) Experimental (for proposed Modelling/Algorithm-Centred Study): Underpinning Theoretical Framework, Algorithm/Model Development method/s, Algorithm/Model evaluation and validation) (24) Data Analysis Methods (6) Limitations (4) Timeline (4) References (2) Please follow the format given in the Template file. Min margins are Narrow as per Word setting: Top 1.27cm, Bottom 1.27cm, Left 1.27cm, Right 1.27cm. Use Narrow only if you absolutely lacking space! Assignment 2 Research Proposal TEMPLATE- Modelling-Algorithm -1.docx Assignment 2 Research Proposal TEMPLATE - Materials-based research-1.docx Minimise file preview https://rmit.instructure.com/courses/64886/files/14863936/download?wrap=1 https://rmit.instructure.com/courses/64886/files/14863940/download?wrap=1 09/10/2020 Assignment-2: Research Proposal (week 12) https://rmit.instructure.com/courses/64886/assignments/485864 2/7 Please note that: The proposal should strictly be three pages. Include coversheet as below Start with Title Make sure to insert your name and student ID under the title as per TEMPLATE Insert the subtitle for each section, as given in the Proposal Template. Submit your assignments only in PDF format. Include only relevant references - they could be on the 4th page. Assessment weighting: Individual –100 pt (50% of final grade) This assessment task supports CLOs 2 and 3 Feedback mode: Feedback will be provided using Canvas. How to submit Assignment 2 to Canvas File for canvas submission. File format: PDF ZOOM Title Student Name/ID- Assignment 2, Research Proposal - Semester 2, 2020. Abstract 1. Introduction (Include Significance (Rationale), Connection to the current body of knowledge, Gap/s leading to the need for your project) Font Calibri (Body) 10.5, Justified 2. Aim, Expected Outcomes and Research Questions (Include Aim, Expected Outcomes, Research Questions) Font Calibri (Body) 10.5, Justified 3. Study Design/Approach Write your study design approach here, Font Calibri (Body) 10.5, Justified. Flowchart welcome if applicable. 4. Experimental 4.1 Materials Write your materials here, Font Calibri (Body) 10.5, Justified. Summary Tables welcome. 4.2 Instruments Write your instruments here, Font Calibri (Body) 10.5, Justified. Summary Tables welcome. 4.3 Methods Write your methods here, Font Calibri (Body) 10.5, Justified. Summary Tables welcome 4.4 Data Analyses Methods 5. Limitations Write your limitations here, Font Calibri (Body) 10.5, Justified. 6. Timeline Insert your Gantt Chart here, Font Calibri (Body) 10.5. Strictly 3 pages for the above content. References (could be on p.4 if needs be) Include signed Cover Sheet as the first page. 09/10/2020 Assignment-2: Research Proposal (week 12) https://rmit.instructure.com/courses/64886/assignments/485864 3/7 Assignment 2 - Research Proposal Rubric File Title: Assignment 2, your Name, your student number, for example – Assignment 2, David Smith, s1234567 Document Structure and Layout Please fill in the coversheet available here and include it as the first page in your Assignment 2 PDF document HE-assignment-cover-sheet- Research Methods.pdf Please use the template shown above for writing and submission of your Assignment 2 Turnitin checking of your drafts To avoid Canvas issues we had last time, we now created a special additional “Assignment 2 for checking the similarity report of your drafts”. You can submit your drafts for checking to this assignment two times. These are not marked and are for your own checking only. If you don't want to check your drafts it is ok not to do so. It is expected that you check your drafts ahead of final submission of your assignment and it is your responsibility to allow enough time before final submission for this. Please make sure that you submit your correct drafts for checking – we will not make any amendments to submission process for checking if you make mistakes. Please review again all information in Module 5 relevant to plagiarism – here. Please keep in mind that using study approach, methodology, methods from published papers, even with re- phrasing, without due acknowledgement and reference is plagiarism. In Assignment 2 you are to develop your own research proposal with original study design/approach. Final Submission of your Assignment 2 Please submit your final version of the Assignment 2 to the “Assignment-2: Research Proposal (week 12)” for marking. Please make sure that you submit the correct file – only two submission are allowed. You will receive TurnitIn report: if the similarity score is between 25% and 35%, we will review the similarity report and make academic judgement regarding possible plagiarism. All reports with similarity score above 35% will be reviewed and, if plagiarism is detected, Course Coordinator will be notified for review and decision. Confirmation of Canvas submission. When you submit your assignment on Canvas, it will display a time stamp and confirmation of successful submission on the right-hand side of the page. We recommend that you wait until you see that confirmation and that you take a screen shot of that message - this ensures you stay on the page long enough for the assignment to be successfully submitted and acts as proof of your submission for you if any submission issues arise. https://rmit.instructure.com/courses/64886/files/14863922/download?wrap=1 https://rmit.instructure.com/courses/64886/pages/week-5-before-class-activities-avoiding-plagiarism?module_item_id=2677136 09/10/2020 Assignment-2: Research Proposal (week 12) https://rmit.instructure.com/courses/64886/assignments/485864 4/7 Criteria Ratings Pts 2.0 pts 10.0 pts 4.0 pts 8.0 pts Title 2.0 Pts Excellent Concise and descriptive, reflects the proposed project very well 1.5 Pts Adequate Descriptive, good link to the proposed project – easy to understand what the project is about 1.0 Pts Poor Broad, does not reflect the essence of the proposed project well 0.0 Pts Incomplete Not addressed at all or what is provided is irrelevant to the rest of the assignment Abstract 10.0 Pts Outstanding Clear and detailed, covers all key elements, with excellent flow: reason for research, problem being addressed, study design, expected outcomes and their implications 8.0 Pts Excellent Good cover of all key elements in a concise style. All elements are linked to the proposed project, where some elements are more strongly addressed than others. 6.0 Pts Good Satisfactory abstract, covers most of the key elements, with few either not covered or not clear 4.0 Pts Adequate Some attempt is made to summarise the research proposal, with some key elements covered with adequate detail, with others either not covered or not clear 3.0 Pts Poor The abstract does not summarise the proposal clearly 0.0 Pts Incomplete Not addressed at all or what is provided is irrelevant to the rest of the assignment Introduction: Significance (Rationale) 4.0 Pts Outstanding Exceptional rationale, concise, clearly linked to the proposal. Value of the project clearly expressed. No improvements could be made 3.5 Pts Excellent Excellent rationale linked to the proposed aims and objectives. Value of the project clearly expressed in a concise style. 2.5 Pts Good Rationale well expressed with fair link to the proposed project. However, is not of the optimal size: either too brief or too extensive in a proposal framework. 2.0 Pts Adequate There is adequate expression of significance which would benefit from more details and/or closer link to the project proposal 1.5 Pts Poor The significance section has some link to the project proposal but is not convincing in terms of its value: either too broad or not linked well 0.0 Pts No marks Not addressed at all or what is provided is irrelevant to the rest of the assignment Introduction: Connection to the current body of knowledge and Gap/s leading to the need for your project 8.0 Pts Outstanding High understanding and presentation of the existing relevant knowledge and research outcomes. Gap/s in key existing findings is/are exceptionally closely linked to the proposed project aim and objectives, as well as the proposed study design 7.0 Pts Excellent Good presentation of relevant existing knowledge in the proposed project focus, both in methods, methodology and findings. Excellent link of the identified gap/s to the proposed aims, study design and methods outlined in the proposal. 6.0 Pts Good Sufficient coverage of existing knowledge and existing gap/s which is linked to the project aim and objectives. Links to the study design, methodology and methods are not clearly expressed and could be improved. 4.0 Pts Adequate Some coverage of the existing knowledge linked to the proposed project. Gap/s are not identified or are not clearly linked to the proposed aims and objectives. There is no clear link to the study design and methods used in existing studies. 2.0 Pts Poor Some coverage to the relevant existing knowledge is provided which is either too broad or is not well linked to the proposed project. Some elements such as relevant existing study design/s and/or methods links are missing 0.0 Pts Incomplete Not addressed at all or what is provided is irrelevant to the rest of the assignment 09/10/2020 Assignment-2: Research Proposal (week 12) https://rmit.instructure.com/courses/64886/assignments/485864 5/7 Criteria Ratings Pts 6.0 pts 5.0 pts 5.0 pts 20.0 pts Aim 6.0 Pts Excellent Aim is concise and well expressed with clear links to the proposed project and its significance. It is achievable with available resources and time allocated for your project in the Project Proposal. 4.0 Pts Good Aim is well expressed and has a link to the proposed project and its significance. However, either too broad or not critically considered in view of allocated resources/time framework of your Research Proposal. 2.0 Pts Adequate Aim is expressed but is not closely and concisely linked to the proposed project and its significance. It is questionable in view of the available resources/time available for the project and allocated in your Research Proposal. 1.0 Pts Poor Aim is broad and/or not clearly linked to the project and its significance. Link to the available resources/time is very weak or not clear. 0.0 Pts Incomplete Not addressed at all or what is provided is irrelevant to the rest of