hi , i just need 2 paragraphs of 500 words explaining brief about the project problems and opportunities related to Qantas (file attached)
BIZ304_Assessment 2_ Recommendation Report_M5 ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF Subject Code and Title BIZ304 Business Consulting Project Assessment 2 Project Phase II is in 2 parts Part A: Discussion Forum Part B: Research Report Individual/Group Part A: Individual Part B: Group (3-4 students maximum) Length Part A: 400 words minimum Part B: 2,000 words each +/- 10% Learning Outcomes a) Identify the most important parts of a business problem/opportunity and apply a range of problem- solving skills b) Collaborate with multiple stakeholders on a significant project managing it to completion c) Develop high levels of Client orientation and professionalism d) Formulate and communicate effective and innovative solutions and recommendations to business problems/opportunities Submission Part A: By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Module 4 (week 8) Part B: By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Module 6 (week 11) Weighting Part A: 15% Part B: 30% Total Marks 100 Marks Context: This Recommendation Report builds on your earlier work for the Consulting Project (Assessment 1 Phase I: Research Report) where you clearly established the problem/opportunity and researched the Client’s organisation and industry. Having undertaken that research, you are now required to develop your recommendations for the Client. BIZ304_Assessment 2_ Recommendation Report_M5 Industry pays significant amounts of money for high quality consultant recommendations. This project provides a simulated, real-life case to test your ability to deliver sound recommendations that add value to an organisation. Assessment 3 for this subject requires you to make a presentation of this report. There is a separate Assessment Brief for that undertaking. In order to develop valuable recommendations for the Client, you will need to properly analyse the data that emerged in Phase I and develop ways to solve the Client’s problem/opportunity. As you are working in a team you will need to collaborate and at different times all members of the group will need to demonstrate leadership. By drawing on the insights and skills of the entire team, you maximise the chances of the end product being effective and innovative. In formulating your recommendations, you will need to interact with multiple stakeholders including the Client in particular, but also with your learning facilitator, potentially with third party providers of information and with each other. As in industry, in all instances, maintaining professionalism is paramount. Any contact with the Client (including emails) must first be approved by the Learning Facilitator. As Appendices to the report (not included in the word count) the group will be required to provide for each team member one page of feedback (for example, on their leadership, collaboration, professionalism, communication skills etc. during the project). Each page of feedback will be agreed and co-written by all the other team members and cannot be edited by the receiver of the feedback. The feedback should be constructive, and must include both positive as well as developmental suggestions, with specific examples to support behavioural observations wherever possible. You are encouraged to take notes throughout the term that you can refer to, to facilitate this. Feedback can draw on your experiences in both Assessments 1 and 2. Instructions: You are required for Part A to: Regularly post your comments (identifying your specific contributions/roles to the project) to the group discussion forum as activities evolve Be clear about your personal involvement You are required for Part B to: I. Clearly introduce the report and its purpose, as well as the key findings from Phase I BIZ304_Assessment 2_ Recommendation Report_M5 II. Acknowledge all stakeholders and data sources, as well as any other important background information or context III. Utilise relevant theory and tools to develop justifiable, effective and innovative solutions to the Client brief IV. Refer to specific sections of Phase I of the project where appropriate to validate assertions and generate confidence V. Effectively communicate why each recommendation is sound and how it will contribute to solving the problem/opportunity VI. Include relevant and defensible project management timelines, scope, resource requirements and budget for implementing the recommendations (1 page) VII. Include a short recommended project management task sheet table indicating who from the Client would be responsible for delivering all elements of the plan (1 page) VIII. Include a summary of key project risks, sensitivities and limitations (1 page) IX. Include a short outline of a project communications plan as appropriate - including tactics, tools, media and budget (1 page) X. Provide a high-level plan for measurement and evaluation of the recommendations if implemented (1 page) XI. Provide a high-level plan for any recommended follow up or further action required (1 page) XII. Include for each team member a 1-page Appendix of feedback Submission Instructions: Submit the group assessment via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in BIZ304 by the end of week 10 (one submission per group). The facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. All members of one group will be awarded the same mark. You will be assessed on your ability to: analyse and problem-solve issues and to develop effective and creative recommendations demonstrate Client orientation and a professional approach while addressing the issues/opportunities identified in the Diagnosis Report engage and participate collaboratively, consultatively and collegially in the team BIZ304_Assessment 2_ Recommendation Report_M5 Page 4 of 7 Learning Rubric: Assessment 2 Part A Assessment Attributes Fail (Unacceptable) Pass (Functional) Credit (Proficient) Distinction (Advanced) High Distinction (Exceptional) Grade Description (Grading Scheme) Fail grade will be awarded if a student is unable to demonstrate satisfactory academic performance in the subject or has failed to complete required assessment points in accordance with the subject’s required assessment points. Pass is awarded for work showing a satisfactory achievement of all learning outcomes and an adequate understanding of theory and application of skills. A consistent academic referencing system is used and sources are appropriately acknowledged. Credit is awarded for work showing a more than satisfactory achievement of all learning outcomes and a more than adequate understanding of theory and application of skills. A consistent academic referencing system is used and sources are appropriately acknowledged. Distinction is awarded for work of superior quality in achieving all learning outcomes and a superior integration and understanding of theory and application of skills. Evidence of in-depth research, reading, analysis and evaluation is demonstrated. A consistent academic referencing system is used and sources are appropriately acknowledged. High Distinction is awarded for work of outstanding quality in achieving all learning outcomes together with outstanding integration and understanding of theory and application of skills. Evidence of in‐depth research, reading, analysis, original and creative thought is demonstrated. A consistent academic referencing system is used and sources are appropriately acknowledged. Group Discussion Forum 100% Little information about your specific, individual involvement in the project team Some acceptable information about your specific, individual involvement in the project team Information, evidence and explanations are included showing good specific, individual involvement in the project team Information, evidence and explanations are included showing very good, specific individual involvement in the project team Information, evidence and explanations are included showing proactive and supportive collaboration with very good, specific individual involvement in the project team http://www.tua.edu.au/media/50742/a240_grading-scheme.pdf BIZ304_Assessment 2_ Recommendation Report_M5 Page 5 of 7 Learning Rubric: Assessment 2 Part B Assessment Attributes Fail (Unacceptable) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75 -84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% Grade Description (Grading Scheme) Fail grade will be awarded if a student is unable to demonstrate satisfactory academic performance in the subject or has failed to complete required assessment points in accordance with the subject’s required assessment points. Pass is awarded for work showing a satisfactory achievement of all learning outcomes and an adequate understanding of theory and application of skills. A consistent academic referencing system is used and sources are appropriately acknowledged. Credit is awarded for work showing a more than satisfactory achievement of all learning outcomes and a more than adequate understanding of theory and application of skills. A consistent academic referencing system is used and sources are appropriately acknowledged. Distinction is awarded for work of superior quality in achieving all learning outcomes and a superior integration and understanding of theory and application of skills. Evidence of in-depth research, reading, analysis and evaluation is demonstrated. A consistent academic referencing system is used and sources are appropriately acknowledged. High Distinction is awarded for work of outstanding quality in achieving all learning outcomes together with outstanding integration and understanding of theory and application of skills. Evidence of in‐depth research, reading, analysis, original and creative thought is demonstrated. A consistent academic referencing system is used and sources are appropriately acknowledged. Integrates and applies theoretical frameworks and models to address problems and/or opportunities from the Research Report Limited use and understanding of required concepts and knowledge. Key components of the assignment are not addressed Adequate use and knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline Thorough knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline/s. Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence Highly developed understanding of the field or discipline/s Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts A