Hi i need two parts to be made for this assignment. part 1- powerpoint slides(Details are in attached file). Ipart 2- Short self reflective essay.(1500 words) refer to attached file for description.

1 answer below »
Hi i need two parts to be made for this assignment. part 1- powerpoint slides(Details are in attached file). Ipart 2- Short self reflective essay.(1500 words) refer to attached file for description.


ASSESSMENT TWO: PART I-GROUP PRESENTATION BUSN20017 ǀ Assessment 2 Term 1, 2022, Marking Rubric ǀ Page | 1 ǀ CRICOS Provider Code: 02219C School of Business and Law CQUniversity Australia ǀ Key Criteria . High Distinction Excellent (HD) Distinction Good (D) Credit Fair(C) Pass Average (P) Fail Poor (F) Introduction  Captures audience’s attention  Establishes credibility/ethos  Relates topic to audience (exigency) interest  Previews the main points  Articulates thesis statement Group mark Excellent introduction; articulates the five parts of the introduction in a superior manner. 4.25-5.00 marks. Good introduction; clearly articulates the five parts of the introduction; one or two of the components could have been more specifically stated. 3.75-4.20 marks. Fair introduction; fair introduction; articulates four of the five parts of the introduction; one or two of the articulated four parts could have been more specifically stated. 3.25-3.70 marks. Average introduction; articulates less than three parts of the introduction. 2.5-3.2 marks. Extremely poor or non-existent introduction. 0-2.45 marks. Main Point  Step One—Problem/Solution  Step Two—The problem  Step Three—The solution  Step Four—The benefits  Step Five—The actualisation  Transition to next part of the presentation Individual mark Demonstrates a high level of detailed knowledge by addressing all five steps and the transition. Each subpoint is explained, well organized, supported with appropriate evidence. 5.1-6.0 marks. Demonstrates a good level of detailed knowledge by addressing all five steps and the transition. Each subpoint is mostly explained, well organized, and supported by appropriate evidence. 4.5-5.04 marks. Demonstrates a fair level of knowledge by addressing all five steps and the transition. Each subpoint is mostly explained, well organized, and supported by appropriate evidence. One of the steps is under-developed. 3.9-4.44 marks. Demonstrates an average knowledge by addressing all five steps and the transition. Each subpoint is mostly explained, well organized, and supported by appropriate evidence. Two steps are under-developed. 3.00-3.84 marks. Demonstrates extremely poor knowledge by not addressing all five steps and/or the transition. One or more of the required parts is missing. Evidence is not consistently applied throughout the articulation of the main point. 0-2.94 marks. Delivery  Adequate eye contact  Vocal variety and expression  Sounded confident and knowledgeable  Proper tone of speech  Rate of delivery was appropriate Individual mark Excellent delivery. The presenter demonstrates vocal variety and expression, sounds confident, uses an appropriate tone and delivers the presentation at an appropriate rate. Eye contact is maintained throughout the presentation. 2.45-3.00 marks. Good delivery. The presenter demonstrates some vocal variety and expression, sounds confident, uses an appropriate tone, and delivers the presentation at an appropriate rate. Eye contact is maintained throughout the presentation. 2.25-2.52 marks. Fair delivery. The presenter demonstrates some vocal variety and expression, sounds confident, uses an appropriate tone, but does not deliver the presentation at an appropriate rate. Eye contact is maintained throughout the presentation. 1.95-2.22 marks. Average delivery. demonstrates some vocal variety and expression, sounds confident, uses an appropriate tone, but does not deliver the presentation at an appropriate rate. Eye contact is not maintained throughout the presentation. 1.5-1.92 marks. Poor delivery. The presenter mumbles and incorrectly pronounces terms, is not expressive, and difficult to hear. Eye contact is not maintained. 0-1.49 marks. ASSESSMENT TWO: PART I-GROUP PRESENTATION BUSN20017 ǀ Assessment 2 Term 1, 2022, Marking Rubric ǀ Page | 2 CRICOS Provider Code: 02219C School of Business and Law CQUniversity Australia ǀ Conclusion  Restatement of the three main points and the thesis statement  A capstone statement that identifies and requests a specific action from the audience Group mark Excellent conclusion; articulates all three parts of the conclusion in a sophisticated manner. The conclusion is memorable and creative. 2.45-3.00 marks. Good conclusion; clearly articulates the three parts of the conclusion; one of the components could have been more specifically stated. The conclusion is generally memorable and creative. 2.25-2.52 marks. Fair articulation of the conclusion; two of the articulated three parts could have been more specifically stated. The conclusion is somewhat memorable and creative. 1.95-2.22 marks. Average conclusion; articulates one of the three parts of the conclusion. The conclusion is minimally memorable and creative. 1.5-1.92 marks Extremely poor conclusion; does not clearly include any of the three parts. The conclusion is not memorable and creative. 0-1.49 marks. References  APA 7th Edition (see the APA document in Assessment Section of Moodle) Group mark Excellent reflection of the APA format. All references conform to the APA format. All fifteen references are from journals listed on the Required Journal List 4.25-5.00 marks. Good reflection of the APA format. Most of the references conform to the APA format. All fifteen references are from journals listed on the Required Journal List. 3.75-4.20 marks. Fair reflection of the APA format. There are systematic errors within the references. All fifteen references are from journals listed on the Required Journal List. 3.25-3.70 marks. Average reflection of the APA format. There are systematic errors within the references. Less than fifteen references are from journals listed on the Required Journal List. 2.5-3.2 marks. No references are showed. 0-2.45 marks. Sentence level speaking outline  See example in Moodle Group mark Excellent sentence-level speaking outline. The outline is clearly structured based upon the required format. The appropriate level of detail is provided. No errors in written communication. 4.25-5.00 marks. Good sentence-level speaking outline. The level of detail is lacking in some areas. Uses the required format. No errors in written communication. 3.75-4.20 marks. Fair sentence-level speaking outline. The sentence-level speaking outline structure needs improvement. The level of detail is generally underdeveloped. Uses the required format. No errors in written communication. 3.25 to 3.70 marks. Average sentence-level speaking outline the sentence-level speaking outline it does not use the required structure. There is a distinct lack of detail. There are errors in written communication. 2.5-3.2 marks. Extremely poor sentence-level speaking outline. The sentence level speaking outline is not submitted. 0-2.45 marks. Team charter  See team charter in Moodle Group mark Excellent team charter: significant insight is demonstrated in the responses to the areas identified within the charter proforma. 4.25-5.00 marks. Good team charter: some insight is demonstrated in the response to the areas identified within the charter proforma. 3.75-4.20 marks. Fair team charter: all the areas within the proforma have been addressed. 3.25-3.70 marks. Average team charter: all the areas within the proforma have been minimally addressed. 2.5-3.2 marks. Extremely poor team charter: not all of the areas within the proforma have been addressed/proforma not included in the report. 0-2.45 marks. Assessment TWO: Assessment Two: Group Oral Video Presentation and Short Essay ASSESSMENT TW0: PART TWO--SHORT SELF-REFLECTION ESSAY CRICOS Provider Code: 02219C BUSN20017 ǀ Assessment 2 Term 1, 2022, Marking Rubric ǀ Page | 1 ǀ School of Business and Law CQUniversity Australia ǀ Key Criteria High Distinction Excellent (HD) Distinction Good (D) Credit Fail (C) Pass Average (P) Fail Poor (F) Introduction  Identifies the topic  Establishes significance of the topic  Previews the structure of the essay  Articulates thesis statement  Supplies a transitional statement to the first body paragraph Excellent introduction; identifies the topic, the significance of the topic, a preview of the structure of the essay, in addition to articulating a thesis statement and a transition to the body of the essay in a superior manner. 4.25- 5.0 marks. Good introduction; identifies the topic, the significance of the topic, a preview of the structure of the essay, in addition to articulating a thesis statement and a transition to the body of the essay. One of the components could have been more specifically stated. 3.75-4.20 marks. Fair introduction; identifies the topic, the significance of the topic, a preview of the structure of the essay, in addition to articulating a thesis statement and a transition to the body of the essay. Two of the components could have been more specifically stated. 3.70-3.25 marks. Average introduction; identifies the topic, the significance of the topic, a preview of the structure of the essay, in addition to articulating a thesis statement and a transition to the body of the essay. One of the required components is missing. 2.5-3.2 marks. Extremely poor introduction (more than one of the parts of the introduction are
assessment-two-marking-criteria-assessment-two-group-presentation-1-liv5qvta.pdf assessment-two-marking-criteria-assessment-two-essay-gib3crgn.pdf assessment-two-description-pmzlpvnj.pdf assessment-screenshort-1-5dirb0hw.png
Answered 2 days AfterMay 24, 2022

Answer To: Hi i need two parts to be made for this assignment. part 1- powerpoint slides(Details are in...

Shubham answered on May 26 2022
91 Votes
Running Head: SELF-REFLECTION ESSAY                        1
SELF-REFELCTION ESSAY                                10
ASSESSMENT TWO: PART TWO--SHORT SELF-REFLECTION ESSAY
Table of Contents
Introduction    3
Reflection    4
Ineffective Communication Challenge    5
Remedial Communication Action    6
Emotional Quotient:    7
Observation:    7
Being Tactful:    7
Staying in Positive Attitude and Cooperative:    7
Conclusion    7
References    9
Introduction
Communication competence is required for our relationships, health and all the activities, in which we humans are engaged. According to Back et al. (2020), the interpersonal skills have wide range of benefits like resilience to stress and other psychological problems, more happiness in life and enhanced professional gains. There is a question that why communication skills are important for human existence and the answer to this question is what we study in this field has a direct impact on the quality of communication we make and ultimately the quality of our lives are impacted.
As the society is growing and acquiring complex traits it is essential that professionals gain competitive communication skills so that they can demonstrate a better understanding of societal needs and transfer of information. In the last decade, the field of communication has evolved as a social science discipline with a rapid pace. Experts wrote book and researchers explored areas in communication, which needs to be given due consideration.
As mentioned by Claro et al. (2018), universities and colleges started giving importance to communication in curriculum with close intervention from industries. At professional front, it has been noticed that some professionals are more socially skilled as compared to others. This investigation has been done in three phases:
(i) Developmental: It is done at young age or supposedly in children when they refine and extend their repertoire of social skills.
(ii) Remedial: The actions taken for those who showed unsatisfactory results or failed in delivering their repertoire of social skills and
(iii) Specialised:. When an individual strengthens, the weaker areas through professional encounters, they gain a specialised level while handling demanding situations. As believed by Back et al. (2020), with this, the rise of organisational communication, also known as internal communication, came into picture.
Internal communication is important because its effectiveness helps an organisation to accomplish objectives. For instance, there is a need to introduce a change in the organisation looking after the performance and management decided that some processes would be transformed. If the communication flow is not effective, it will create ambiguity and resistance in the system.
As indicated by Claro et al. (2018), employees will fear their future in the company and there will be reduced motivation along with delays in meeting deadlines. The appropriate communication channels have significant role to play, as they are responsible for circulation of information and ensuring collaboration between employees for smooth functioning of processes.
In order to have sound communication there is a need of effective communication skills. As mentioned by Henrickson et al. (2022), as key personnel, a manager or an employee, one should have communication skills to let other understand yourself clearly and get the message, which you actually want to convey.
It also improves the inter-personal relationship and helps to share necessary...
SOLUTION.PDF
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download