1 LAW00720 Legal Studies Session 2 2019 ASSIGNMENT 2 XXXXXXXXXXDue date: XXXXXXXXXXSunday 15 September 11.59 pm XXXXXXXXXXValue: XXXXXXXXXX% of the total value of this unit (25 marks)...

HiIn addition to Below i have 2 more files to attach. I want expert with law to do do my aasinment.


1 LAW00720 Legal Studies Session 2 2019 ASSIGNMENT 2 Due date: Sunday 15 September 11.59 pm Value: 25% of the total value of this unit (25 marks) Length: 2800 words (maximum) If the word limit is exceeded marks may be deducted where the excess is caused by irrelevant material. QUESTION 1 (13 marks) A. Ada was a wholesaler and retailer in the jewellery business. A friend of hers ,Roberta, was an importer of fine jewellery and sold the jewellery in three shops that she owned. There was no business connection between them. Ada discovered that Roberta was importing jewellery at a much cheaper price than Ada paid. After making extensive inquiries, Ada located the name of Roberta’s supplier: Qualstone Co. in Sri Lanka. Ada contacted Qualstone and ordered jewellery pieces at $50 per piece. Ada signed the contract in Roberta’s name but for Ada’s own financial benefit. She did not have the consent of Roberta to enter the contract. Roberta discovered the transaction and wants to obtain the benefit of the contract. Advise Roberta of her legal rights. In you answer you are required to refer to relevant legal authority B. Peter wrote to Alan and asked him to buy 200 ladies Society Brand dresses for him at not more than $60 per dress. Alan went to Toselli warehouse and chose 200 Society Brand dresses. He did not tell Toselli that he was acting on behalf of anyone. Alan signed a contract in his own name for the purchase of 200 dresses at $60 per dress. On discovering this transaction, Peter informed Toselli that he was Alan’s principal and demanded that Toselli deliver the dresses to him. Toselli refused, claiming that the contract was with Alan and would deal only with Alan. 2 (a) Advise Peter of any rights he may have against the above parties in regard to the contract of 200 dresses at $60 per dress. (b) What would your advice be if the contract price for the dresses had been $67? In your answer, you are required to refer to relevant legal authority. QUESTION 2 (12 marks) Nicko recently entered into a written agreement with Top Publishing Co to subscribe for a monthly magazine called ’ English for Migrants- Beginners to advanced stage’. The background to the negotiations and the entering into the contract are as follows: Nicko arrived in Australia about 10 months ago. He could not read or write in the English language. He could speak and understand spoken English with much difficulty. He was employed as a clerical assistant by a large corporation. His job was to assist in operating the various photocopying machines used by the company. He had earlier enrolled in English language classes with an adult education centre conducted by the NSW government. One day while Nicko was having dinner in a café near where he worked, he met Dan West, a sales representative for Top Publishing Co. They started chatting and Nicko told Dan about his difficulty with English. He said that this prevented him from getting any promotion in the company. Dan said that his employer published a monthly magazine called ‘English for Migrants- Beginners to advanced stage’. He told Nicko that the magazine would be of great advantage to a person in Nicko’s position. He explained that the magazine was very well thought of and was used by English teachers in their classes. Dan said this although he knew of only one teacher who, on an occasional basis , used the magazine. He also told Nicko that many employers have been recommending to their migrant employees that they obtain a subscription to the magazine. This statement is untrue. Dan informed Nicko that if he wanted to take out a subscription he should do so immediately as there were a very limited number still available and were available only to persons selected by Dan. This statement is untrue. Dan said: ‘Nicko, you should act now or you will lose this opportunity to improve your English and this will prevent you getting promotion. Subscribe today for a better future at work and in your social life’. Dan then produced a written contract of ten pages in length containing 90 clauses including a provision by which the subscriber agreed for an additional fee to purchase binders for each year’s copies of the magazine from the publisher at the end of the year of the subscription. This clause was not brought to Nicko’s attention. There was also a provision in the contract by which the publisher had the discretion to review the subscription price at six-monthly intervals during the currency of the subscription and to increase the price if, in the opinion of the publisher, the production costs of the magazine had increased. This clause was not drawn to the attention of Nicko. 3 Nicko was not sure he understood the meaning of the clauses in the contract and told Dan that he would like to telephone a solicitor friend to come to Nicko’s house that night to read the contract and explain all the clauses to him. Dan told him there was nothing to be concerned about and that by waiting another day Nicko might be too late to get the subscription. Dan said: ’ Sign the contract now and be sure of getting the magazine. You have time to go to your bank and get the money to begin your subscription.’ Nicko then went to his bank and withdrew the money. He then signed the contract and handed the money to Dan for the subscription price. A few days later Nicko had doubts about whether he should continue with the subscription even though all his workmates agreed that the content of the magazine was of a genuinely high standard and would be of benefit to him for the development of his English skills and for his future job prospects. Nicko now seeks your advice regarding the contract. He wants to know whether he can have the contract set aside. Advise Nicko In your answer, you are required to refer to relevant legal authority Assignment notes Please write as simple as you can but issues and facts clear with cases. We are not given any slides for this lecture so we are allowed take photos in class. For this assignment please use photos, study guide and book (Law in commerce 6 th Edition, BrendanSweeny, Jennifero’reilly and Andrew Coleman,) detail of the case for which the facts are not given in study guide. Use only cases in photos and for the facts of cases you can use study guide or book mention adove only. Don’t use cases that are not in photos folders attached. We are not allowed to use any source from outside as it is introductory unit. They want to use only above sources as no references required. Do not use cases that are not in photos. Q2 should be of more words as required more discussion.Please word limit should be divided as per the marks aaloted to the questions. Study guide page - We have to use ILAC in answers. Issue : Where in the Issues only Questions. Law : In Law only little description of few words in short for the case and the name of the case only Application: Use the above issues and law and the cases to the facts of the question. Please do not explain case. Only explain case how it related to the questions issue or fact. Conclusion: short not too long Main focus should be on the application part. Please don’t go out of slides or photos and use book refered for facts of cases mention in slide if Study guide doesn’t have. LAW00720 Legal Studies Session 2 2019 ASSIGNMENT 2 Value: 25% of the total value of this unit (25 marks) Length: 2800 words (maximum) If the word limit is exceeded marks may be deducted where the excess is caused by irrelevant material. QUESTION 1 (13 marks) A. Ada was a wholesaler and retailer in the jewellery business. A friend of hers ,Roberta, was an importer of fine jewellery and sold the jewellery in three shops that she owned. There was no business connection between them. Ada discovered that Roberta was importing jewellery at a much cheaper price than Ada paid. After making extensive inquiries, Ada located the name of Roberta’s supplier: Qualstone Co. in Sri Lanka. Ada contacted Qualstone and ordered jewellery pieces at $50 per piece. Ada signed the contract in Roberta’s name but for Ada’s own financial benefit. She did not have the consent of Roberta to enter the contract. Roberta discovered the transaction and wants to obtain the benefit of the contract. Advise Roberta of her legal rights. In you answer you are required to refer to relevant legal authority Solution 1 from lecture Uses cases from the photo attached in the slides for the facts the book or the study guide. 1A. Solution- Fradulant representation Issues Put 2 issues from question for the fraudulent representation or if you think something else. Law Please write laws and short description of of few words. Should not be too big Application This part carries maximum marks please focus more. Conclusion Q1- B. Peter wrote to Alan