School of Business and Law CQUniversity XXXXXXXXXXCRICOS Provider Code: 02219C MGMT 20135: Critical Thinking and Managerial Decision Making Assessment 2: Written Assessment- Reflective Essay This...

1 answer below »
Hi Teams,I need Azra as my assignment expert. He did my last one and I got pretty good marks in that. Order was 42743 for that ass.


School of Business and Law CQUniversity CRICOS Provider Code: 02219C MGMT 20135: Critical Thinking and Managerial Decision Making Assessment 2: Written Assessment- Reflective Essay This assessment item accounts for 40% of your final grade for this unit and must be completed by students individually. Due: The assessment is due on Monday of week 9, 16th. September 2019 at 5.00 PM AEST. Length: The essay must be 2000 words in length excluding references. Two points will be deducted for assessments that are over or under by 200 words. Cover page: The essay must include a cover page that contains your name, student number, resident campus, assessment title, lecturer and word count. Format: Text should be word-processed, Times New Roman, 12 size font and line spacing (1.5). Referencing: A minimum of 10 academic references are required. The list of references should form the last page or two, at the end of the assessment. Referencing should be in a consistent APA style. Submission: Please save and upload your file in a Word format (.doc or .docx) via the assessment link on Moodle. Task Description: The objectives of this reflective essay are for students to (1) summarize, critically review and reinforce key concepts and theories learned from week 1 to week 8 of this unit. (2) reflect on these concepts/theories’ potential impact on students’ decision making, and how these learning are being applied and could be applied in their current jobs, development of future career and/or their life generally. (3) reflect on new insights gained about oneself as a result of learning the unit and propose a plan for self-development. Students are expected to reflect on the topics (week 1- week 8) this unit has covered and evaluate which topics have inspired their thinking or influenced their decision making. You must pick Four topics covered during the eight weeks. Each topic needs to contain a CONVINCING and PERSONAL justification of why these topics are chosen and how the mentioned topics have changed/might change the students’ thinking or the students’ decisions. For example, students could identify the topic of “automatic versus critical thinking” as a theme for one week’s reflection, and illustrate with personal examples how having learned about the differences has enabled him/her to be more effective in making a certain decision at work. Close to the end, the essay needs to reflect on self- knowledge and highlight implications for future self-development. To successfully complete this assessment task, students should answer the following reflective essay questions: School of Business and Law CQUniversity CRICOS Provider Code: 02219C • Which concepts/theories from which week’s learning activities are significant or important to you? • Why are these concepts/theories you have identified important or significant to you? (Theoretical review) • How are the concepts/theories you have learned influencing/impacting your decision- making in relation to your current interpersonal relationships, professional workplaces and/or personal life? (Practical Application) • What have you learned about yourself through the unit activities? What skills do you possess and what skills are you lacking? How are you going to improve your decision- making in the future? (Self-knowledge and self-development) • You should tie all your arguments/insights together at the end of your paper, highlighting how you think you will be able to use your learning in your future career and in life generally. Assessment 2: Written Assessment- Reflective Essay Marking Rubrics Section/Criteria 40% Fail (< 25%) fail (26-49%) pass (50-64%) credit (65-74%) distinction (75-84%) high d (85-100%) introduction & conclusion 6 no introduction. no conclusions provided. no topic, key points and/or purpose is introduced or the introduction is irrelevant to assessment item. brief conclusion but no links established to the introduction and body of the essay. topic introduced, but the introduction is underdeveloped in terms of key points and/or purpose. brief conclusion with limited links established to the introduction and body of the essay. topic, key points and purpose of the essay is introduced with satisfactory clarity. the conclusion provided some links to the introduction and body, but was not concise or unclear. topic, key points and purpose of the essay is introduced in a clear and interesting way. the conclusion provided links to the introduction and body, but concise or unclear at times. topic, key points and purpose of the essay is introduced in a clear and interesting way. clear and concise summary of the essay with links to the introduction and body of the essay. critical review of key concepts/theories are the following two questions well addressed? which concepts/theories from each week’s learning activities are significant or important to you? why are these concepts/theories you have identified important or significant to you? 10 the concepts and theories that will be considered, and their impact on the students’ thinking and decision-making are not clearly identified and justified. containing no or little review of the concepts/theories not meeting the requirement of four (4) concepts/theories the concepts and theories that will be considered are identified but justification for why they are important to the students are not sufficiently articulated. the review of the concepts/theories is insufficient. not meeting the requirement of four (4) concepts/theories the concepts and theories that will be considered, and their impact on the students’ thinking and decision- making are clearly identified and articulated in an acceptable manner. containing sufficient literature review of four (4) concepts theories and acceptable justification of why the chosen concepts/theories are significant. the concepts and theories that will be considered, and their impact on the students’ thinking and decision-making are clearly identified and articulated in an effective manner. containing good literature review of four (4) concepts/theories and a good justification of why the chosen concepts/theories are significant. the concepts and theories that will be considered, and their impact on the students’ thinking and decision-making are clearly identified and articulated. containing competent literature review of four (4) concepts/theories and a strong and convincing justification of why the chosen concepts/theories are significant. the concepts and theories that will be considered, and their impact on the students’ thinking and decision-making are clearly identified and articulated. containing excellent review of four (4) concepts/theories and exceptionally strong and convincing justification of why the chosen concepts/theories are significant. reflection on course impact in personal decision making is the following question well addressed? how are the concepts/theories you have learned influencing/impacting your decision-making in relation to your current interpersonal 10 demonstrates little, if any reflection on unit impact in personal decision making with extremely limited, if any, analysis. demonstrates limited reflection on unit impact in personal decision making by providing a limited level of analysis. demonstrate average level of reflection on unit impact in personal decision making by providing an acceptable level of analysis. demonstrates a good level of reflection on unit impact in personal decision making by providing some level of analysis with evidence. demonstrates a high level of reflection on unit impact in personal decision making by providing a high level of analysis with evidence. demonstrates an exceptional level of reflection on unit impact in personal decision making by providing a high level of analysis with strong and compelling evidence. assessment 2: written assessment- reflective essay marking rubrics relationships, professional workplaces and/or personal life? reflection on self-knowledge and future development are the following questions well addressed? what have you learned about yourself through the course activities? what skills do you possess and what skills are you lacking? how are you going to improve your decision- making in the future? 10 demonstrates little, if any reflection on self- knowledge and self- development with extremely limited, if any, analysis. demonstrates limited reflection on self-knowledge and self-development by providing a limited level of analysis demonstrate average level of reflection on self-knowledge and self-development by providing an acceptable level of analysis. demonstrates a good level of reflection on self- knowledge and self- development by providing some level of analysis with evidence. demonstrates a high level of reflection on self-knowledge and self-development by providing a high level of analysis with evidence. demonstrates an exceptional level of reflection on self- knowledge and self- development by providing a high level of analysis with strong and compelling evidence presentation: 2 quality of writing is at a very poor standard so barely understandable. many spelling mistakes. little or no evidence of proof reading. quality of writing is at a poor standard. frequent grammar, punctuation and spelling mistakes. use of inappropriate language. some problems with sentence structure and presentation. frequent grammar, punctuation and spelling mistakes. use of inappropriate language. quality 25%)="" fail="" (26-49%)="" pass="" (50-64%)="" credit="" (65-74%)="" distinction="" (75-84%)="" high="" d="" (85-100%)="" introduction="" &="" conclusion="" 6="" no="" introduction.="" no="" conclusions="" provided.="" no="" topic,="" key="" points="" and/or="" purpose="" is="" introduced="" or="" the="" introduction="" is="" irrelevant="" to="" assessment="" item.="" brief="" conclusion="" but="" no="" links="" established="" to="" the="" introduction="" and="" body="" of="" the="" essay.="" topic="" introduced,="" but="" the="" introduction="" is="" underdeveloped="" in="" terms="" of="" key="" points="" and/or="" purpose.="" brief="" conclusion="" with="" limited="" links="" established="" to="" the="" introduction="" and="" body="" of="" the="" essay.="" topic,="" key="" points="" and="" purpose="" of="" the="" essay="" is="" introduced="" with="" satisfactory="" clarity.="" the="" conclusion="" provided="" some="" links="" to="" the="" introduction="" and="" body,="" but="" was="" not="" concise="" or="" unclear.="" topic,="" key="" points="" and="" purpose="" of="" the="" essay="" is="" introduced="" in="" a="" clear="" and="" interesting="" way.="" the="" conclusion="" provided="" links="" to="" the="" introduction="" and="" body,="" but="" concise="" or="" unclear="" at="" times.="" topic,="" key="" points="" and="" purpose="" of="" the="" essay="" is="" introduced="" in="" a="" clear="" and="" interesting="" way.="" clear="" and="" concise="" summary="" of="" the="" essay="" with="" links="" to="" the="" introduction="" and="" body="" of="" the="" essay.="" critical="" review="" of="" key="" concepts/theories="" are="" the="" following="" two="" questions="" well="" addressed?="" which="" concepts/theories="" from="" each="" week’s="" learning="" activities="" are="" significant="" or="" important="" to="" you?="" why="" are="" these="" concepts/theories="" you="" have="" identified="" important="" or="" significant="" to="" you?="" 10="" the="" concepts="" and="" theories="" that="" will="" be="" considered,="" and="" their="" impact="" on="" the="" students’="" thinking="" and="" decision-making="" are="" not="" clearly="" identified="" and="" justified.="" containing="" no="" or="" little="" review="" of="" the="" concepts/theories="" not="" meeting="" the="" requirement="" of="" four="" (4)="" concepts/theories="" the="" concepts="" and="" theories="" that="" will="" be="" considered="" are="" identified="" but="" justification="" for="" why="" they="" are="" important="" to="" the="" students="" are="" not="" sufficiently="" articulated.="" the="" review="" of="" the="" concepts/theories="" is="" insufficient.="" not="" meeting="" the="" requirement="" of="" four="" (4)="" concepts/theories="" the="" concepts="" and="" theories="" that="" will="" be="" considered,="" and="" their="" impact="" on="" the="" students’="" thinking="" and="" decision-="" making="" are="" clearly="" identified="" and="" articulated="" in="" an="" acceptable="" manner.="" containing="" sufficient="" literature="" review="" of="" four="" (4)="" concepts="" theories="" and="" acceptable="" justification="" of="" why="" the="" chosen="" concepts/theories="" are="" significant.="" the="" concepts="" and="" theories="" that="" will="" be="" considered,="" and="" their="" impact="" on="" the="" students’="" thinking="" and="" decision-making="" are="" clearly="" identified="" and="" articulated="" in="" an="" effective="" manner.="" containing="" good="" literature="" review="" of="" four="" (4)="" concepts/theories="" and="" a="" good="" justification="" of="" why="" the="" chosen="" concepts/theories="" are="" significant.="" the="" concepts="" and="" theories="" that="" will="" be="" considered,="" and="" their="" impact="" on="" the="" students’="" thinking="" and="" decision-making="" are="" clearly="" identified="" and="" articulated.="" containing="" competent="" literature="" review="" of="" four="" (4)="" concepts/theories="" and="" a="" strong="" and="" convincing="" justification="" of="" why="" the="" chosen="" concepts/theories="" are="" significant.="" the="" concepts="" and="" theories="" that="" will="" be="" considered,="" and="" their="" impact="" on="" the="" students’="" thinking="" and="" decision-making="" are="" clearly="" identified="" and="" articulated.="" containing="" excellent="" review="" of="" four="" (4)="" concepts/theories="" and="" exceptionally="" strong="" and="" convincing="" justification="" of="" why="" the="" chosen="" concepts/theories="" are="" significant.="" reflection="" on="" course="" impact="" in="" personal="" decision="" making="" is="" the="" following="" question="" well="" addressed?="" how="" are="" the="" concepts/theories="" you="" have="" learned="" influencing/impacting="" your="" decision-making="" in="" relation="" to="" your="" current="" interpersonal="" 10="" demonstrates="" little,="" if="" any="" reflection="" on="" unit="" impact="" in="" personal="" decision="" making="" with="" extremely="" limited,="" if="" any,="" analysis.="" demonstrates="" limited="" reflection="" on="" unit="" impact="" in="" personal="" decision="" making="" by="" providing="" a="" limited="" level="" of="" analysis.="" demonstrate="" average="" level="" of="" reflection="" on="" unit="" impact="" in="" personal="" decision="" making="" by="" providing="" an="" acceptable="" level="" of="" analysis.="" demonstrates="" a="" good="" level="" of="" reflection="" on="" unit="" impact="" in="" personal="" decision="" making="" by="" providing="" some="" level="" of="" analysis="" with="" evidence.="" demonstrates="" a="" high="" level="" of="" reflection="" on="" unit="" impact="" in="" personal="" decision="" making="" by="" providing="" a="" high="" level="" of="" analysis="" with="" evidence.="" demonstrates="" an="" exceptional="" level="" of="" reflection="" on="" unit="" impact="" in="" personal="" decision="" making="" by="" providing="" a="" high="" level="" of="" analysis="" with="" strong="" and="" compelling="" evidence.="" assessment="" 2:="" written="" assessment-="" reflective="" essay="" marking="" rubrics="" relationships,="" professional="" workplaces="" and/or="" personal="" life?="" reflection="" on="" self-knowledge="" and="" future="" development="" are="" the="" following="" questions="" well="" addressed?="" what="" have="" you="" learned="" about="" yourself="" through="" the="" course="" activities?="" what="" skills="" do="" you="" possess="" and="" what="" skills="" are="" you="" lacking?="" how="" are="" you="" going="" to="" improve="" your="" decision-="" making="" in="" the="" future?="" 10="" demonstrates="" little,="" if="" any="" reflection="" on="" self-="" knowledge="" and="" self-="" development="" with="" extremely="" limited,="" if="" any,="" analysis.="" demonstrates="" limited="" reflection="" on="" self-knowledge="" and="" self-development="" by="" providing="" a="" limited="" level="" of="" analysis="" demonstrate="" average="" level="" of="" reflection="" on="" self-knowledge="" and="" self-development="" by="" providing="" an="" acceptable="" level="" of="" analysis.="" demonstrates="" a="" good="" level="" of="" reflection="" on="" self-="" knowledge="" and="" self-="" development="" by="" providing="" some="" level="" of="" analysis="" with="" evidence.="" demonstrates="" a="" high="" level="" of="" reflection="" on="" self-knowledge="" and="" self-development="" by="" providing="" a="" high="" level="" of="" analysis="" with="" evidence.="" demonstrates="" an="" exceptional="" level="" of="" reflection="" on="" self-="" knowledge="" and="" self-="" development="" by="" providing="" a="" high="" level="" of="" analysis="" with="" strong="" and="" compelling="" evidence="" presentation:="" 2="" quality="" of="" writing="" is="" at="" a="" very="" poor="" standard="" so="" barely="" understandable.="" many="" spelling="" mistakes.="" little="" or="" no="" evidence="" of="" proof="" reading.="" quality="" of="" writing="" is="" at="" a="" poor="" standard.="" frequent="" grammar,="" punctuation="" and="" spelling="" mistakes.="" use="" of="" inappropriate="" language.="" some="" problems="" with="" sentence="" structure="" and="" presentation.="" frequent="" grammar,="" punctuation="" and="" spelling="" mistakes.="" use="" of="" inappropriate="" language.="">
Answered Same DaySep 08, 2021MGMT20135Central Queensland University

Answer To: School of Business and Law CQUniversity XXXXXXXXXXCRICOS Provider Code: 02219C MGMT 20135: Critical...

Azra S answered on Sep 12 2021
127 Votes
Name- Anurag Sharma
Student Number-
Resident campus-
Assessment title- MGMT 20135: Critical Thinking and Managerial Decision Making- Reflective Essay
Lecturer-
Word count- 2066 words (Excluding references)
Critical Thinking and Managerial Decision Making
A Journey towards Self-discovery and Leadership
Critical thinking forms an extremely important part of managerial decision-making. It helps in developing o
nes logical and creative thinking ability and at the same time channels one’s knowledge to considering the dynamics of a particular option (Smith, 2003). Through the various activities and theories that I learned through the eight weeks, I have learned several important concepts that have shaped my thoughts, influenced my personality and encouraged me to think about things in a different manner.
Each week introduced me to something new that I didn’t know, or something that I knew but did not give much thought to before. I have become more capable of understanding, recognizing and appreciating the various parts of an argument, the different components of decision-making and the different types of decisions. All in all, these eight weeks have helped me emerge with quite a different understanding of decision-making than I had before.
My learning through the weeks has taught me a lot about management, decision-making and leadership. However, most of all, it has taught me about myself. Through the learning of week 4 and subsequent weeks, I learned the importance of knowing oneself in order to develop as a leader. A good leader is someone who understands himself and uses his strengths to empower his followers (Dewan, & Myatt, 2008). As a result I decided to know more about myself. I conducted a DISC profile and also some other tests to determine the type of personality I have and my behavioural pattern. I then focussed my understanding on ways to shape myself into becoming a better leader (Judge, Bono, Ilies, & Gerhardt, 2002). The results of my profile were promising and revealed to me several things that I already know about myself and also many that I didn’t know.
My DISC profile showed that my natural style is CS and my adjusted style is CSI. As a CS, I am the slow and witted type of person who likes to take time to make decisions and considers the various variables of a decision carefully. I am careful and detailed and this makes me a sort of perfectionist. Essentially my profile revealed to me that I already am a critical thinker and this was a delightful discovery to me. As a natural critical thinker and decision-maker I felt that I was one-step ahead of others in achieving my desired outcomes.
I am the rule-abiding, thorough and systematic type who dislikes disorder and relies more on logic than emotion. Hence the important decisions I make are calculated and well thought-out. In general I am a reliable person when it comes to important matters. However, I am a bit reserved with my opinions and don’t open-up easily. I also like to take time in my work and do it well, meaning, I hate deadlines and find it difficult to deal with them.
Even though I have realized that critical thinking isn’t much of a challenge for me, I have also realized that there are other areas of my personality that I need to work on in order to improve my personality in general and as a manager and leader in particular. I was able to realize these facts through reflecting on the teachings of this course. Even though I learnt a lot from the course in general, I have chosen four topics from the eight weeks that have had the greatest influence on me to discuss in this essay.
The first topic was “Automatic thinking versus Critical thinking”. This was among the very first concepts introduced to us in our first week of learning. While we have learned and known something about thinking and critical thinking from before, this concept was striking because it clearly showed the difference between the way we usually think and actual critical thinking. We usually automatically assume that we are thinking critically but that is actually not critical thinking, it is just our belief that we are thinking critically. Our regular...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here