Unit BISY2005/ISY2005/ISY205 Enterprise Systems Assessment Type Report Assessment Number Three Assessment Name Weighting Case Study 35% (20% for report and 15% for presentation) Alignment with Unit...

Unit BISY2005/ISY2005/ISY205 Enterprise Systems
Assessment Type Report
Assessment Number Three
Assessment Name
Weighting
Case Study
35% (20% for report and 15% for presentation)
Alignment with Unit
and Course
Unit Learning Outcomes

Graduate Attributes Assessed
ULO 1: Show an understanding of the
basic principles and issues associated
with enterprise systems.

ULO 2: Explain and describe the scope
of common enterprise systems (e.g.
supply chain, HRM, procurement, etc.)
GA 2: Collaboration
GA 3: Research
GA 4: Critical Thinking
GA 5: Ethical Behaviour
GA 6: Flexibility

ULO 3: Identify and critically assess the
challenges associated with
implementing enterprise systems and
their impact on business.

ULO 4: Demonstrate an understanding
of the enterprise system development
life cycle, from selection, acquisition,
implementation, and maintenance.

ULO 5: Identify the factors that
contribute to an organisation’s
readiness to implement enterprise
systems and how obstacles might be
overcome.
Due Date/Time
Week 6 (Report and Presentation)
Online Moodle Submission; Week 6 (Session 1), Friday, 5pm
Assessment
Description
Case studies assess students’ understanding of concepts presented in weekly lectures
and tutorials by researching and analysing real life situations. This is a Group
assignment.
In this assignment, students are required to write a 2,500 to 2,600-word report. Students
are also required to submit a 5-6 minute PowerPoint presentation, with audio, discussing
the key points of the report. From the Insert tab, choose Insert Audio. Keep the narration
for each slide under 40 seconds.
 Identify two case studies of failed ERP implementations.
 For each case, explain why the ERP implementation project was considered a
failure.
 For each case, discuss the factors that contributed to the failure of the ERP
implementation project.
 What lessons can be learned from these cases?
You are required to use additional references to support your arguments. Your report
should be a synthesis of ideas researched from a variety of sources and expressed in
your own words. It should be written in clear English in electronic format as either a
Word document or a pdf file. This electronic file will be checked using Turnitin for any
evidence of plagiarism.
3
You are expected to use in-text citations to support your arguments which should be
referenced in the normal Harvard referencing style.

Presentation
Students are required to create a short 5-6 minute presentation that includes audio
which presents a summary of the report findings. The presentation should consist of at
least 10 to 12 slides including the title slide and references slide. Keep your narration
to about 20 to 30 seconds for each slide.
A soft copy of the presentation should be submitted to Moodle. Ensure that your
presentation is less than 25MB in size.
Detailed
Submission
Requirements
Online Moodle Submission via Turnitin.

Before submission, you ensure the submitted work satisfies the following requirements:
 The assignment is to be written in a report format. It must have separate
sections for each of the FOUR tasks above.
 The report should additionally, include an Executive Summary, Table of
Contents, Introduction, Conclusion and References
 Submit as a PDF file through the Turnitin assignment submission tool on
Moodle.
 Include a cover sheet that has your name, subject, date, report title and WORD
COUNT
 The assignment should not exceed 2,600 words with a minimum of 2,500
words, excluding references.
4
Special
consideration
Students whose ability to submit or attend an assessment item is affected by sickness,
misadventure or other circumstances beyond their control, may be eligible for special
consideration. No consideration is given when the condition or event is unrelated to the
student's performance in a component of the assessment, or when it is considered not
to be serious.

Students applying for special consideration must submit the form within 3 days of the
due date of the assessment item or exam.
The form can be obtained from the AIH website (https://aih.nsw.edu.au/current-
students/student-forms/) or on-campus at Reception.

The request form must be submitted to Student Services. Supporting evidence should
be attached. For further information please refer to the Student Assessment Policy and
associated Procedure available on
(https://aih.nsw.edu.au/about-us/policies-procedures/).

Referencing and Plagiarism It is essential to use IN TEXT referencing. If you are using
the exact words from a reference then you must use quotation marks. You can use
Harvard Style referencing, with a listing at the end of the essay.
http://www.citethisforme.com/harvard-referencing Remember that this is a Turnitin
assignment and plagiarism will be subject to severe penalties. Please refer to the AIH
Academic Misconduct Policy: https://aih.nsw.edu.au/wp-
content/uploads/2017/11/StudentAcademic-Misconduct-Policy.pdf
DO NOT COPY AND PASTE FROM THE INTERNET OR COPY OTHER STUDENTS’
WORK!




https://aih.nsw.edu.au/current-students/student-forms/
https://aih.nsw.edu.au/current-students/student-forms/
https://aih.nsw.edu.au/about-us/policies-procedures/
http://www.citethisforme.com/harvard-referencing
https://aih.nsw.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/StudentAcademic-Misconduct-Policy.pdf
https://aih.nsw.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/StudentAcademic-Misconduct-Policy.pdf
5
Rubric for Report (20 marks)

Requirements Total High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Pass Fail
Depth and Breadth of Coverage

Demonstrating understanding or
interpretation of key concepts of
enterprise systems initiatives in the
chosen organisation, the
implementation challenges and
criteria for success
10% All aspects of the
question are
addressed in depth.
Most aspects of
the question are
addressed in
depth.
Most aspects of the
question are
addressed
adequately.
Basic aspects
of the question
are addressed
adequately.
Responses are
superficial and /
or inadequately
addressed the
question.
8.5 to XXXXXXXXXXto XXXXXXXXXXto 7.4 5 to 6.4 0 to 4.9
Critical Elements 5% The written work
shows great depth
of thought, excellent
development of
argument, logical
analysis and insight
into the subject.
The written work
shows some
evidence of
analysis,
supported by
logical argument
and insight into
the subject.
The written work
shows evidence of
elementary analysis
and the
development of
argument.
The written
work is mainly
descriptive,
showing basic
understanding
of the topic.
The written work
demonstrates
limited
understanding of
the topic.
4.3 to 5 3.8 to XXXXXXXXXXto XXXXXXXXXXto 3.2 0 to 2.4
Structure, Language and
Conventions
5% All aspects of the
written work
conform to a high
academic /
professional
standard.
Most aspects of
the written work
conform to a high
academic /
professional
standard.
Most aspects of the
written work
conform to an
acceptable
academic /
professional
standard.
The written
work displays
basic
structure.
The written work
is not of an
academic /
professional
standard.
4.3 to 5 3.8 to XXXXXXXXXXto XXXXXXXXXXto 3.2 0 to 2.4
6
Rubric for Presentation (15 marks)
Requirements Total High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Pass Fail
Ability to Explain & Clarify

Demonstrating
understanding or
interpretation of key concepts
of enterprise systems
initiatives in the chosen
organisation, the
implementation challenges
and criteria for success
5% All aspects of the
question are
addressed in depth.
Most aspects of
the question are
addressed in
depth.
Most aspects of the
question are
addressed
adequately.
Basic aspects
of the question
are addressed
adequately.
Responses are
superficial and /
or inadequately
addressed the
question.
4.3 to 5 3.8 to XXXXXXXXXXto XXXXXXXXXXto 3.2 0 to 2.4
Speaker's Insight &
Understanding
5% The presentation
demonstrated deep
understanding and
comprehension of
the topic. There was
clear evidence of
independent
thought and
reflection on topic.
The presentation
demonstrated
sound
understanding
and
comprehension of
most aspects of
the topic.
The presentation
demonstrated good
understanding and
comprehension of
most aspects of the
topic.
The
presentation
demonstrated
basic
understanding
and
comprehension
of most of the
topic.
The presentation
did not
demonstrate
sufficient
understanding
and
comprehension of
the topic.
4.3 to 5 3.8 to XXXXXXXXXXto XXXXXXXXXXto 3.2 0 to 2.4
Method of Delivery 5% The topic was
covered in a highly
professional and
organised manner.
The presenter
displayed excellent
verbal skills and
delivered a highly
interesting, coherent
presentation at an
appropriate level for
the audience.
The topic was
covered in a
professional and
organised
manner. The
presenter
displayed good
verbal skills and
mostly delivered
an interesting
coherent
presentation at an
appropriate level
for the audience.
The topic was
covered in an
organised manner.
The presenter
displayed adequate
verbal skills and
mostly delivered a
coherent
presentation at an
appropriate level for
the audience.
The topic was
covered in a
basic manner.
The presenter
displayed
minimal
standards of
verbal skills
and / or
coherence and
organisation.
The topic was not
covered
acceptably and /
or poorly
organised.
Verbal skills were
inadequate.
4.3 to 5 3.8 to XXXXXXXXXXto XXXXXXXXXXto 3.2 0 to 2.4
May 13, 2021BISY2005

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here