hi this is very easy one just need slides on topic Artificial Intelligence and rest like introduction ,conclusion and all are mentioned in the file so please refer to the file for more information and please follow the marking rubric to complete the presentation just need a power point slides rest i will do and an individual reflection word file is needed if you can make
Assessment Specification for ITECH1001 Assignment 3: Group Presentation and Individual Reflection Task Due Weighting Annotated Bibliography Week 4 10.0% Individual Report Week 9 30.0% Group Presentation and Individual Reflection Week 11 20.0% Examination 40.0% Table 1. Due Dates & Assessment Weighting Summary Course Objectives The assessment tasks specified in this document address a number of the objectives of this course; these being: · use a range of effective communication strategies; · deliver effective oral presentations to an audience; · write professional letters, memos and reports using correct grammar and spelling; · work independently and in teams; and · adapt a communication strategy to suit the audience. Breakdown of marks Task Weighting Group presentation 10.0% Presentation materials 5.0% Individual Reflection 5.0% Table 2. Breakdown of marks Topics Choose one topic, either of your own interest[footnoteRef:1], or it could be from the following list: [1: If you choose your own topic, you must have it agreed by your teaching staff.] 1) Cyber Security 2) Wearable IT 3) Natural Language Processing 4) Artificial Intelligence 5) Data Mining 6) Software Engineering 7) Virtual or Augmented Reality 8) Games Development The intention is to provide the audience of the presentation with an introduction to the chosen topic, through a series of synthetic slides and accompanying discussion. The slides will only contain a few bullet-points and images, and will be a summary of what is being spoken, and so the voice-over by the presenter will convey the larger information. Group Presentation You will be placed into groups of size 3-5 – how this occurs will be decided by your campus lecturer - it could be random, or you may be invited to form your own groups. Groups will be provided with the opportunity to work on this assignment within the normal tutorial and laboratory time. It is expected that students will also have to work outside of class in order to complete the tasks. Each student is required to contribute four or five minutes to the overall presentation to the class on the chosen topic of their group. Marks will be awarded for clarity of voice, presentation during the talk, use of slides, engaging ideas and timing of the presentation. *Each member of the group needs to upload the presentation materials to Moodle. The presentation will consist of the following: · Introduction slide · Conclusion slide · Additionally at least one slide per member. Slides will contain: · Good quality image(s), with appropriate resuse permissions · A few short bullet-points (e.g. 4 or 5) Kaltura video The final product can be in Kaltura[footnoteRef:2] video format. Each person will do a voice-over for their slides, and all of these movie files will be combined into a single movie. Try and ensure that transitions/hand-overs between speakers is as smooth and seamless as possible. We will provide information on Kaltura in later classes. [2: https://corp.kaltura.com/video_resource/moodle-lms-walkthrough/] Collaboration Groups will be expected to decide early on how they intend to collaborate and share ideas and content. This could be as simple as using mobile phones and email to communicate, and Dropbox to share files. There are many other alternatives, for instance using Trello (highly recommended) to keep on target with tasks. Team leader and Group structure You are advised to early on decide on a leader for your group, and any other management structure or responsibilities. Individual Reflection Each student should also submit an individual reflection (Word document) for assessment via Moodle detailing: · Their contribution to the presentation · A discussion on the group performance and dynamic with reference to group theories discussed in class. · A discussion of the groupware used to facilitate the presentation Marking Rubric for Presentation Topic 0 No focus on topic 1 Often loses focus and/or too short or too long 2 Some focus on topic and/or incorrect length 3 Sometimes loses focus, good length 4 Keeps focus on topic for most of presentation, good length 5 Good focus throughout presentation with good length Voice and pace 0 Volume inappropriate for room, lacks clarity and expression 1 Lacking in expression and clarity, no expression 2 Mostly clear, suitable tone, but lacking in expression 3 Mostly clear, suitable tone and some expression 4 Sometimes not clear, variability in tone and expression 5 Very clear, good tone and expression. Audience Engagement 0 None shown 1 Lacking in presence, nervousness inhibiting delivery 2 Audience sometimes engaged. very nervous 3 Audience engaged sometimes, very nervous. 4 Captures audience attention, lacking some calmness and confidence 5 Good audience engagement, good presence. Physical devices 0 Presentation entirely read from script 1 Presentation is almost entirely read from script 2 Very limited interaction with audience, constantly reads from script or slides. 3 Limited interaction with audience, almost total reliance on one device 4 Good use of physical devices to interact with audience. 5 Audience is engaged by good use of a wide range of devices. Use of slides 0 Very poor use of slides, standing in front of slides, slides confusing and/or irrelevant 1 Poor use of slides, too much information and/or not related to topic. 2 some fair use of slides however some slides confusing and/or irrelevant 3 Satisfactory use of slides. Points sometimes not relevant. 4 Good use of slides. Points interesting and relevant 5 Excellent use of slides, talked to the slides very well, points well chosen for presentation. Time limit 0 Far too short, no preparation shown 1 Presentation is too short, little preparation shown 2 Presentation is too long or too short. Some preparation shown 3 Presentation is a bit too long or too short, fair preparation shown 4 Good length but abrupt finish. 5 Excellent length with good conclusion and hand over. Marking Rubric for Presentation Materials Quality of design 0 Very poor, no design evident 1 Presentation not well designed, quality lacking in written or visual component 2 Presentation design is adequate, but lacking in written or visual components 3 Presentation is well designed and somewhat original, interesting and inventive 4 Very well designed presentation that is interesting, inventive and original. Use of Graphics 0 None shown 1 Images do not support or relate to topic 2 Some relevant images used 3 Use of images supported overall topic 4 Highly relevant and interesting images Structure 0 Very poor 1 Information is not well organised 2 Information is somewhat organised but confusing in some places. 3 Information is organised and easy to follow 4 Organisation shows considerable thought and planning. Appropriateness of PowerPoint 0 Very poor 1 PowerPoint not appropriate for audience and purpose. 2 PowerPoint is basically appropriate for audience and purpose 4 PowerPoint is appropriate for audience and purpose 4 PowerPoint is highly appropriate for audience and purpose. Quality of content 0 Very poor 1 Overall quality is poor with materials illegible, information incorrect and spelling mistakes. 2 Overall quality is adequate, but some errors in spelling and some poor quality graphics. 3 Overall quality is good, with most information correct and presented well 4 Overall quality shows meticulous planning with interesting, relevant graphics and well-presented information. Marking Rubric for Individual Reflection Critical review of group 0 Not supplied 1.5 Review of group practices very shallow with no evidence of critical thought and/or reference to Tuckman 3 Review of group practice fair with some evidence of critical thought and/or reference to Tuckman 4.5 Good review of group practices with evidence of critical thought and reference to Tuckman 6 Excellent review of group process with strong evidence of critical thought and insightful reference to Tuckman Groupware review 0 Not supplied 1.5 Very shallow comments on groupware 3 Some comments on groupware used but lacking critical thought. 4.5 Good comments on groupware with some critical though. 6 Excellent discussion of groupware used with evidence of critical thought in discussion of pros and cons. Explanation of contribution 0 Not supplied 1 Brief explanation 2 Attempted explanation, but too brief. 3 Good explanation 4 Excellent explanation CRICOS Provider No. 00103D Insert file name here Page 1 of 6 CRICOS Provider No. 00103D ITECH1001 Assignment Specification Page 6 of 6