 Hide Assignment Information |
Turnitin® |
|
 This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin®. |
Instructions |
|
This assignment will provide an outline for your risk analysis final project.
Please remember that under the directions of the final project (see directions under assignment - Final Project) there are requirements for what to have in your project. BE SURE TO FOLLOW THOSE DIRECTIONS. Please provide a minimum of three (3) references and a minimum of one (1) paragraph for each of the following headings below:
- Overview of the Facility
- Risk Matrix
- Identify Ten (10) Specific Risks (Any facility will have hundreds of risks associated with it. You are only required to address ten.)
- Indicate Indemnification
- Waivers
- Narrative Regarding Risk Reduction Procedures
- Personnel Management
- Emergency Procedures
- ADA Compliance
- Crowd Management Plan
- Conclusion/Summary
- References
Submission Directions: Please submit your assignment as an APA, current edition formatted, Microsoft Word document (.doc or .docx), not an Adobe .pdf, titled "Your Last Name Week 4 Assignment." For example, the document should be titled: Smith Week 4 Assignment. Please do not paste your assignment into the text box provided within each assignment. If you do not have access to Microsoft Office software, please see the first course announcement titled "Free Microsoft Office 365 Software for APUS Students," since all students have the ability to download free Microsoft 365 software, which includes Word, Excel, and PowerPoint, among others.
Note: All assignments must be original; that isyou must be the author, it mustnothave been used for any other course, andno partmay have come from an external site such as Course Hero. All of these are examples are forms of plagiarism, will not be tolerated, and will result, at a minimum, of receiving a zero on the assignment. Please see the "Plagiarism and Honor Code Resources" button on the course home page for more information.
|
Due Date |
|
Oct 3, 2021 11:55 PM |
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: SPMT Assignment Rubric (Dec 2020)
Print RubricThis table lists criteria and criteria group names in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. You cangive feedback on each criterion by tabbing to the add feedback buttons in the table.CriteriaExcellentGoodFairPoorDid not attemptCriterion ScoreFoundation of Knowledge25 points
Student demonstrates comprehensive command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows a superior level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
21.25 points
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in the assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.
18.75 points
Student exhibits a general and average understanding of subject matter throughout the assignment. Student provides an average ability in relating course content in examples given. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
16.25 points
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
0 points
Did not attempt
Score of Foundation of Knowledge,/ 25Criterion score has been overriddenSynthesis of Knowledge20 points
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Topic is clearly defined and thesis is well-constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
17 points
Student establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the assignment. Student demonstrates an effective presentation with most support statements helping to illustrate the key focus of assignment.
15 points
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. Some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.
13 points
Student exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not clearly evident, and reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements.
0 points
Did not attempt
Score of Synthesis of Knowledge,/ 20Criterion score has been overriddenApplication of Knowledge20 points
Student demonstrates a high level of critical thinking necessary for completing this assignment. Learner provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions which are not immediately obvious. Student provides well-supported ideas and reflection with a variety of current and/or world views in the assignment. Student presents a genuine intellectual development of ideas throughout assignment.
17 points
Student exhibits a good command of critical thinking skills in the presentation of material and supporting statements. Assignment demonstrates the student’s above average use of relating concepts by using a variety of factors. Overall, student provides adequate conclusions, with 2 or fewer errors.
15 points
Student takes a common, conventional approach in guiding the reader through various linkages and connections presented in assignment. However, student presents a limited perspective on key concepts throughout assignment and includes numerous formatting errors. Student appears to have problems applying information in a problem-solving manner.
13 points
Student demonstrates beginning understanding of key concepts, but overlooks critical details. Learner is unable to apply information in a problem-solving fashion. Student presents confusing statements and facts in assignment. No evidence or little semblance of critical thinking skills.
0 points
Did not attempt
Score of Application of Knowledge,/ 20Criterion score has been overriddenWriting Skills25 points
Student demonstrates an excellent command of grammar, as well as presents research in a clear and concise writing style. Presents a thorough, extensive understanding of word usage. Student excels in the selection and development of a well-planned, error-free assignment. APA formatting guidelines followed with no errors in citations. Incorporates the minimum number of acceptable references per the assignment directions.
21.25 points
Student provides an effective display of good writing and grammar. Assignment reflects student’s ability to select appropriate word usage and presents an above-average presentation of a given topic or issue. Assignment appears to be well written with no more than 3 grammatical errors. Student provides a good final product that covers the above-minimal requirements. APA format; 1-2 errors in citation. Incorporates the minimum number of acceptable references per the assignment directions.
18.75 points
Assignment reflects basic writing and grammar, but with more than 4 grammatical errors. Key terms and concepts are somewhat vague and not completely explained. Student uses a basic vocabulary in assignment. Student’s writing ability is average, but demonstrates a basic understanding of the subject matter. APA format, but with several omissions and with more than 2 errors in citation. May or may not incorporate the minimum number of acceptable references per the assignment directions.
16.25 points
Topics, concepts, and ideas are not coherently discussed or expressed in assignments. Student’s writing style is weak and needs improvement, along with numerous proofreading errors. Assignment lacks clarity, consistency, and correctness. Student needs to review and revise assignment. Several grammatical errors. APA format not used and errors throughout paper & citations. Lack of appropriate references or source materials. The paper is not of acceptable quality based on assignment expectations.
0 points
Did not attempt
Score of Writing Skills,/ 25Criterion score has been overriddenOrganization of Ideas/Format10 points
Student thoroughly understands and excels in explaining all major points. An original, unique, and/or imaginative approach to overall ideas, concepts, and findings is presented. Overall format of assignment follows directions and includes an appropriate introduction, well-developed paragraphs, and conclusion. Finished assignment demonstrates student’s ability to plan, and be organized in a logical sequence.
8.5 points
Student explains the majority of points and concepts in the assignment. Learner demonstrates a good skill level in formatting and organizing material in assignment. Student presents an above average level of preparedness, with few formatting errors, and by generally following directions.
7.5 points
Student applies some points and concepts incorrectly. Student uses a variety of formatting styles, with some inconsistencies throughout the paper. Assignment may or may not have a continuous pattern of logical sequencing. Did not follow directions in one or more sections of the assignment.
6.5 points
Assignment reveals formatting errors and a lack of organization. Student presents an incomplete attempt to provide linkages or explanation of key terms and does not follow directions.
0 points
D