hlsc 220 argumentative essayHLSC 220 HEALTH CARE ETHICS ASSIGNMENT 1 Argumentative Essay Due date:...

Question

hlsc 220 argumentative essayHLSC 220 HEALTH CARE ETHICS ASSIGNMENT 1 Argumentative Essay Due date: Week 6 Tuesday 31st august 2359 hours Weighting: 50% Length and/or format: 1500 words (+/- 10%) Purpose: The purpose of this assessment is for students to demonstrate the capacity to develop an ethical argument/s based on the four ethical principles: autonomy, justice, beneficence, and non-maleficence. Students will use their allocated topic to develop a sound ethical argumentative opinion piece. Assignment details: During the 1st week of lectures your tutor will allocate a topic for discussion from the prescribed four options. Using the allocated topic given to you construct an argumentative essay. Learning outcomes assessed: 1 & 2 How to submit: Electronically via ‘Turnitin’ week 6 Tuesday 31st august 2359 hours. Late submission will attract a penalty as per ACU assessment policy Return of assignment: Marks and feedback will be published within 3 weeks in Turnitin Assessment criteria: Marking will be undertaken using a rubric (see Appendix 1 in your unit outline). Please include the word count of your assignment on the front page of your assignment or in a header. Please note that in-text citations are included in the word count whilst the reference list is not included in the word count. Words that are more than 10% over the word count will not be considered Please see further information in the section titled ‘Word Count’ in your unit outline. Topic 1. Healthcare workers have a moral obligation to care for COVID19 patients and cannot object to caring for these patients.   HLSC220 Argumentative essay – Points to consider Ethical arguments are comprehensively informed by credible, well-chosen academic literature, &/or professional codes & standards. Evidence of sophisticated level of critical thinking, reasoning, defence & evaluation. Ethical arguments (use of argument and/or counter arguments) are cogent & always well defended. The argument is organised in an exemplary manner: repetitiveness is avoided, the argument flows succinctly, ending with a strong, comprehensive, & rational conclusion. In addition to the rubric the content below are some guidelines for student consideration in writing their argumentative essay. This is not an exhaustive list, but simply points for consideration. The bare minimum is that you should let the reader know the topic and introduce your stance on the issue for example - “this essay will address the options health care workers (HCW) have in confronting issues of violence against them and will show and reason why HCW ought to be able to refuse care”. Remember to clarify your understanding of the topic and key terms or concepts used – do not assume the reader knows – the examiner wants to know that you know. A good argumentative essay considers the counter arguments against the position taken and seeks to defend them with reasoning and logic and always with reference to the literature. Failure to do so cannot be considered an argument – it is a one-sided account and unchallenged opinion even if well sourced and referenced. The essay must be ethically sound and constructed –it ought to provide a rich account of ethical thought and justification based on sound ethical theories and priniciplism. Much of this is available to you in the modules and Leganto reading list in the same tile. Where necessary you might choose to reinforce arguments with professional codes, and legal considerations. Communicating based on an “emotional account” can detract from the essay as the write is communicating on a personal stake on the topic and thus is invested in that emotion. It is better to give example and support the example with the literature in mind. However, you can obviously draw the reader to your argument by providing strong ethical, conventional, and contemporary arguments that support your stance. As always in any essay the following points ought to be respected: · paragraph construction · Flow of argument · Avoiding repetitive statements · Considering the literature and carefully providing sources used · Consider using the literature to point of redundancy – i.e. you read the same view in other sources · A good argument is well supported with the literature and this ought to be provided from multiple sources · There is no required number of reference sources. The lower the volume of evidence will rarely make for a salient essay · You should summarise your stance and argument in the conclusion · Do not introduce new material in this section (Conclusion) · Remember the requirements for presentation in terms of spacing, font size and structure available to you from ACU academic skills unit · If you do use clinical examples, they ought to be reflective of your ethical argument · Finally it is required that you write in the 3rd person RT 202060

Parul · Accepted Answer

MORAL OBLIGATIONS OF HEALTH WORKERS FOR COVID19 PATIENTS
Running Head: MORAL OBLIGATIONS OF HEALTH WORKERS FOR COVID19 PATIENTS								
MORAL OBLIGATIONS OF HEALTH WORKERS FOR COVID19 PATIENTS 	  
MORAL OBLIGATIONS OF HEALTH WORKERS FOR COVID19 PATIENTS
Assignment
Contents
Introduction	3
Global Outlook	3
Applying Four Principles of Healthcare Ethics to Enhance and Improve Patients in this COVID Pandemic	4
Conclusion	8
References	10
Introduction
	Health care ethics involves vast areas of morally decision taking scenarios which arise due to the practice of medicine along with the policies as well as procedures that are structured in order to guide such decisions and practices. Human health is the most import and significant aspect of the body out of all the aspects of human life and body. Various ground breaking developments in the field of medicine and medical technologies bring along different novel as well as significant moral issues (Prentice et al. 2020).These issues usually arise about as an aftermath of developments in the genetic as well as reproductive knowledge and creative innovations in the technologies in the field of medicine (Angelos 2020). Various areas of moral issues and concern involves the clinical relationship between the sick individual and the health care professional , the behavioural and biomedical subject research of humans, abortion, euthanasia, allotting different health care services as well as the  transplantation and harvesting of several organs of the human body etc.  
There should be no reason of thinking healthcare professionals to be obliged to risk professionally their health, because of the lack of essential resources to perform their job safely. This essay will address the moral obligations of the health care workers for the treatment of Covid 19 patients.
Global Outlook 
	The spread of novel corona virus (COVID-19) has created significant issues for medicine and health care professionals, in all the affected countries in the world.  Challenges for dentistry and medicine, and dental and medical schools, in all affected countries. The speed of the transmission and the kind of response to the pandemic around the world has been very fluctuating depending upon the different health care systems, political ideas as well as the finances of the countries worldwide (Bakewell, Pauls, & Migneault, 2020).
	The pandemic has created havoc globally, leading to deaths of millions of people till date and wrecking the financial as well a health status of countries worldwide.  The unexplainable pneumonia was first originated in Wuhan, China and by now, the numbers of cases are increasing with a spike all over the world (Buerhaus, Auerbach, & Staiger, 2020). The older people with any underlying health risk or disease are at high risk and are more likely to get infected with the corona virus as well as infants and children are also at risk of developing severe disease. The treatment and intervention for the pandemic by now, mainly involves some traditional as well as antiviral medicines, complete isolation, close monitoring of the progression of the disease as well as symptomatic support for the patients.   
Applying Four Principles of Healthcare Ethics to Enhance and Improve Patients in this COVID Pandemic
In profession of healthcare either you are doctor or nurse or anyone who is associated with the domain of wellness of patients. Working in domain of healthcare is highly challenging and demanding along with being rewarding. For instance, in present dynamics, we all can discern the magnitude of pressure constantly levied on the healthcare professionals. The entire industry and every person working primarily base their actions and thought process on four principles of ethics in healthcare. With reference to the ethical framework developed by James Childress and Tom Beauchamp in 1985 Journal and Research named s Principle of Biomedical Ethics offers the practitioner and medical professionals set of guidelines, overall structure and holistic overview around ethics. Therefore, whenever practitioner and healthcare professionals face challenges and witness inevitable complication that involves patients they can always refer these principles as gospel. There are four critical principle of healthcare ethics referred as Autonomy, Beneficence, Non-Maleficence and Justice.
1. Autonomy: In medication, self-rule alludes to one side of the patient to hold command over their body. A human service proficient can propose or exhort, yet any activities that endeavour to convince or force the patient into settling on a decision are infringement of this standard. At long last,

HLSC 220 HEALTH CARE ETHICS ASSIGNMENT 1 Argumentative Essay Due date: Week 6 Tuesday 31st august 2359 hours Weighting: 50% Length and/or format: 1500 words (+/- 10%) Purpose: The purpose of this...

Answer To: HLSC 220 HEALTH CARE ETHICS ASSIGNMENT 1 Argumentative Essay Due date: Week 6 Tuesday 31st august...

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

Submit New Assignment