HOLMES INSTITUTE FACULTY OF HIGHER EDUCATION Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines Trimester T1 2021 Unit Code HC2121 Unit Title Comparative Business Ethics and Social Responsibility Assessment...

....


HOLMES INSTITUTE FACULTY OF HIGHER EDUCATION Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines Trimester T1 2021 Unit Code HC2121 Unit Title Comparative Business Ethics and Social Responsibility Assessment Type Group Assignment (Group Report) Note: Groups of 4 students only. Once a group is formed and entered into Blackboard, no changes are allowed. This is strictly required to be your own original work. Plagiarism will be penalised. Students must use correct in-text citation conventions in accordance with the ‘Referencing Requirements’ on pp. 7-8. Assessment Title Group Report (Reflection on individual and organisational problems and challenges). Purpose of assessment and linkage to Unit Learning Outcomes (ULO) the This assignment aimed to draw on the concepts and models used in this unit to evaluate diverse approaches to ethical decision-making and to apply problem-solving skills in solving and managing ethical dilemmas within an organisation. This assignment will help you develop skills in applying the course contents in an organisational analysis. Assessment Weight Group Report Total = 30% Total Marks 30 Marks Word limit Report not more than 2,500 words excluding references. Due Date Week 10 at 5pm (Melbourne/Sydney time) [Late submission penalties accrue at the rate of - 5% per day] Page 2 of 8 Submission Guidelines • All work must be submitted on Blackboard by the due date along with a completed Assignment Cover Page. • The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 12-pt Arial font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings and page numbers. • Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list, all using Harvard referencing style. References provided must follow ‘Reference Requirements’ detailed on page 7 & 8. • Students must show adequate evidence of additional research with a minimum of 10 academic references. • Each group must include a statement of “who did what part” of the report in the cover sheet. Consult your lecturer if you are unsure or you require clarification on plagiarism. Note: You may not get the assignment submission links unless you are registered/enrolled in a group on Blackboard. Note: All students must contribute equally to the assessment. You must acknowledge your group members’ names in the cover sheet. If your name is not included in the cover sheet, you might not receive marks. If you choose to complete the assessment individually, you should self-enrol in a solo group and submit your group assessment individually. Assignment Specifications Purpose This assignment aims at providing students with an opportunity to reflect on ethical dilemmas and challenges in contemporary organisations and apply concepts and frameworks covered within the subject to solving such problems. In groups of 4, students must: Search local newspapers/reports for an ethical issue that is topical. It might be the politics surrounding a minority group, or the latest corporate scandal, or some other issue of interest to you. In 2500 words, briefly describe the case and then evaluate it using the key terminologies/theories that have been discussed in the lecture slides and support your claims/arguments with key research findings/peer-reviewed academic articles. If you can’t locate Page 3 of 8 an ethical issue in local newspapers/reports, you may wish to investigate One of the following corporate scandals: United Airlines https://edition.cnn.com/2017/04/11/travel/united-customer-dragged-off-overbooked- flight/index.html Equifax https://techcrunch.com/2018/12/10/equifax-breach-preventable-house-oversight-report/ Enron https://www.britannica.com/event/Enron-scandal Google https://www.theverge.com/2019/3/20/18270891/google-eu-antitrust-fine-adsense-advertising Assignment report structure should be, as follows: • The report must include a cover page with who did what section in the report. • Table of Contents • Executive Summary • An Introduction and background information of the selected organisation: Briefly introduce the purpose of the report. Within the introductory paragraph, you need to address the key topics you will address in the body paragraphs. • Overview of the current organisational ethical problem or challenge. • Detailed analysis of the current organisational ethical problem supported with relevant concepts and theories that have been covered in the lectures and tutorials. • Recommendations and Conclusion: Outline some recommendations and the conclusion must briefly summarise the key points in the body paragraphs. • Reference List: Please include all in-text references in the list of references formatted in Harvard style. A minimum of 10 references is required. https://edition.cnn.com/2017/04/11/travel/united-customer-dragged-off-overbooked-flight/index.html https://edition.cnn.com/2017/04/11/travel/united-customer-dragged-off-overbooked-flight/index.html https://techcrunch.com/2018/12/10/equifax-breach-preventable-house-oversight-report/ https://www.britannica.com/event/Enron-scandal https://www.theverge.com/2019/3/20/18270891/google-eu-antitrust-fine-adsense-advertising Page 4 of 8 Marking Criteria Weighting Group Report Total 30 marks Overall Structure, format and presentation of report 3 marks Application of knowledge and course concepts 8 marks Critical analysis and research demonstrated in organisational problem or challenge 8 marks Conclusion, recommendation and strength of overall arguments 6 marks Evidence of quality research and referencing 5 marks Marking Rubric for the Written Report Criteria Ratings Overall structure, format and presentation (3 marks) Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Report is exceptionally structured, with sub- sections and correct use of paragraphs. Correct layout including font, font size, spacing and the right length. Report is very well-structured, with sub-sections and correct use of paragraphs. Correct layout including font, font size, spacing and the right length. Report is somewhat structured, with sub-sections and correct use of paragraphs. Correct layout including font, font size, spacing and about the right length. Report is structured, with sub- sections and correct use of paragraphs. Some elements of layout or length incorrect. Report is poorly structured. No sub-section and/or paragraphs. Some elements of layout or length incorrect. Application of knowledge and course concepts (8 marks) Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Gives a very detailed background of the ethical problem and demonstrated sound knowledge of course concepts. There is excellent proof of research on the topic. Gives a detailed background of the ethical problem and demonstrated sound knowledge of course concepts. There is very good proof of research on the topic. Gives some general background of the ethical problem and demonstrated good knowledge of course concepts. There is adequate proof of research on the topic. Gives a general background of the ethical problem. Demonstrate d fair knowledge of course concepts. There is satisfactory proof of research on the topic. Omits a general background of the topic and/or demonstrated poor knowledge of course concepts. There is little or no proof of research on the topic. Critical analysis and research demonstrated in organisational Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Exceptionally logical, Very logical, insightful, Detailed, original discussion Adequate discussion Inadequate discussion of Page 5 of 8 problem or challenge (8 marks) insightful, original discussion develops. Evidence of full engagement with the literature found, with relevant and very detailed critical analysis of organisational problem or challenge. original discussion develops. Evidence of full engagement with the literature found, with relevant and detailed critical analysis of organisational problem or challenge. develops logically. Understanding of reading shown. Some relevant critical analysis of organisational problem or challenge. develops logically. Understandin g of reading shown. Few relevant analysis provided on organisational problem or challenge. issues and/or lacking in logical flow. Little/no demonstrated understanding of reading. Poor or no critical analysis of organisational problem or challenge. Conclusion, recommendation s and strength of overall arguments (6 marks) Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory An interesting, well written summary of the main points. An excellent final comment on the topic, based on the information provided. A very good summary of the main points. A good final comment on the topic, based on the information provided. Good summary of the main points. A final comment on the topic based on the information provided. Satisfactory summary of the main
May 25, 2021HC2121
SOLUTION.PDF

Get Answer To This Question

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here