https://healthtalk.org/intensive-care-patients-experiences/interview-27 please open this link and watch the video of the Thomas there are 27 short interview clips and according to that video we need to find a related 4 journal article and annotate the article and relate that to the case study.Please let me know if you are able to open the link or not. Behavioural responses to acute illness is the unit name. I need have 4 different journal article for this assignment and this assignment is also continue for the group assignment later therefore my journal article must be different to the other group member.
NURS3001 Sem 1 2020 ‐ Annotated Bibliography 1 ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY (WORD LIMIT = 2000 WORDS +/- 10%) What do I need to do? This individual assessment is worth 35 marks and assists you achieve unit learning outcomes: ULO 1: Evaluate common behavioural responses to illness, and physical and psychological disability within different community acute contexts; ULO 2: Analyse how socio- cultural factors within the family and community influence responses to the critically unstable person; ULO 3: Examine coping strategies adopted by the individual and families in response to acute illness. It involves each student completing an annotated bibliography for journal articles related to the case study you have been allocated. NURSING STUDENTS: There are two case studies. The people are not named in their videos, but we will refer to them as: Thomas and Megan. These are real people who experienced a critical illness and describe their experience in the linked videos. PARAMEDICINE STUDENTS: There is only one case study. She is not named in the video, but we will refer to her as Jane. Her experience is available in this 10-minute clip here. While you are listening to and watching these people’s stories, please pay particular attention to the behavioural and psychological responses each person experienced to their illness and their situation (i.e., their physical and social environment). Some of these will be overtly obvious (i.e., the person will directly talk about them – “I was depressed” etc.) but others you will need to identify from other things the person is discussing of from their presentation (e.g., the person may not say they were “depressed” but may mention signs and symptoms of mental distress that are indicative of depression or other psychological concerns). Once you have a good idea about the behavioural and psychological responses present in your case study person’s experience, you will need to locate and annotate four (4) relevant journal articles (research studies preferred) published from the year 2000 onwards related to your case study’s behavioural and psychological experience of their illness and situation (i.e., their physical and social environment and how it played a role in their experience). Do not use the unit’s readings as a source for this assessment. Please do not select a book, book chapter, doctoral dissertation/thesis, letters to the editor, or book review. Your chosen articles must be different to your other group members’ articles (i.e., you cannot annotate the same articles). Then complete the following: For each journal article, you will need to very briefly summarise the main topic and focus of each of your four journal articles and include a very brief summary of the article’s or study’s methodology, results, and discussion (i.e., where the authors explain the causes/reasons for their findings and research conclusions) for the articles. Your reader should understand what the study did, what it found, and why. For each journal article, you will need to provide an evaluation of two (2) main relevant weaknesses of their research study (e.g., the study’s methodology or results etc.) or the authors’ work and claims (if it is not a research study e.g., a literature review) and determine the specific impact of these weaknesses on the validity, reliability, and/or credibility of the authors’ findings and/or research conclusions. Critical evaluation is necessary to ensure the knowledge on which we base our practice is robust and evidence-based. It is important to interpret research findings in the context of the theory relevant to the discipline in which they were produced, the research methodology that was used, and the level of knowledge and understanding of the topic that has been produced by previous research. You will need to consider how the weaknesses you have identified specifically impact the authors’ findings and/or research conclusions (do not state the limitations/weaknesses that the authors themselves identified) and therefore our understanding of the issues/topic/body of knowledge about what is being researched. Do not critique editorial aspects or layout of the article (e.g., saying it was ‘difficult to read/understand’, ‘had easy to understand tables’ etc.). It is much better to critique fewer elements of the paper and instead critique two major weaknesses in more depth. For each journal article, you will need to discuss how the knowledge within each article explicitly and specifically explains why their case study person had their specific behavioural and psychological responses to their illness and situation. This needs to go beyond simple comparison or description (i.e., simply comparing what the person experienced to being similar to what is said in your articles). You need to explain why they had the responses they did using the knowledge and reasoning gained as a result of the research study or literature review. https://healthtalk.org/intensive-care-patients-experiences/interview-27 https://healthtalk.org/intensive-care-patients-experiences/interview-30 http://link.lis.curtin.edu.au/gw?url=https://edutv.informit.com.au/share.php?token=f66d46b45a6237df5aa18931407185fd NURS3001 Sem 1 2020 ‐ Annotated Bibliography 2 How do I submit the assessment? The assessment is to be submitted online as a Word or Word compatible (NOT PDF or .pages) document using the Turnitin link only. It is due by 2359hrs (WST) on Sunday 22nd March 2020 (Week 4). DO NOT JUST LOOK AT THE TURNITIN % SCORE – THERE IS NO “SAFE” % SCORE. YOU MUST LOOK AT THE REPORT ITSELF. It is your responsibility to ensure you submit your drafts to Turnitin as early as possible before the due date so that you have enough time to act on the Turnitin feedback report. Drafts will be overwritten with only the last version submitted being eligible for marking. Late penalties apply to submissions after the due date as per the Unit Outline. Please ensure your Turnitin submission title AND .doc/docx document file names are in the following format: StudentID_StudentFamilyName_AssessmentTitle e.g., 12345678_Windsor_AB It is your responsibility to ensure that you have uploaded the correct document (e.g., not a draft, the wrong file, or an unreadable/ corrupt file) to the correct submission portal before the due date and time. Please double check on Blackboard that you have correctly submitted a document to the submission portal rather than assume that everything went through ok. If you have any problems uploading your assessment (e.g., if Turnitin or Blackboard are not working on the due date) please email the Unit Coordinator with a copy of your final document for assessment as soon as possible before the due date and time. Also ensure you have received a Turnitin receipt via email - if you have not received a receipt then your submission has not gone through. How does this assessment relate to and assist me achieve my profession’s national practice/ capability standards? Nursing Students This assessment has been designed to assist you to continue developing your skills in relation to the following standards of the “Registered Nurse Standards for Practice” (NMBA, 2016): “Standard 1: Thinks critically and analyses nursing practice. RNs use a variety of thinking strategies and the best available evidence in making decisions and providing safe, quality nursing practice within person-centred and evidence-based frameworks. The registered nurse accesses, analyses, and uses the best available evidence, that includes research findings, for safe, quality practice; develops practice through reflection on experiences, knowledge, actions, feelings and beliefs to identify how these shape practice” (p. 3). Paramedicine Students This assessment has been designed to assist you to continue developing your skills in relation to the following domains in the “Professional Capabilities for Registered Paramedics” (PBA, 2018): “Domain 1. Provide each patient/service user with an appropriate level of dignity and care; demonstrate understanding of the influence of socio-cultural factors on patient/service user attitudes and behaviour; assess each situation, determine the nature and severity of the problem and apply the required knowledge and experience to provide a response that is in the best interest of the patient/s”(p. 4). “Domain 3. Makes informed and reasonable decisions; operate within a framework of making informed, evidence-based, reasonable and professional judgements about their practice, with acting in the best interests of their patients as their primary concern; apply critical and reflective thinking to resolve clinical challenges” (p. 6). “Domain 5. Understands the key concepts of the bodies of knowledge which are specifically relevant to paramedicine practice; understand the principles and applications of scientific enquiry, including the evaluation of treatment efficacy and the research process; understand psychological and social factors that influence an individual in health and illness” (p. 9). What is an annotated bibliography? Do I need an introduction/conclusion/end- text reference list? An annotated bibliography is an alphabetical list of APA end-text (reference list) style journal article citations, with each citation being followed underneath by a brief annotation in paragraph format about that journal article. Do not select a book, book chapter, doctoral dissertation/thesis, letters to the editors, or book reviews. You do not need to provide an overall introduction and/or conclusion section for this annotated bibliography. An end-text reference list is not required for this assessment IF the only references you have included in the whole document are the four you have cited above each of your annotations. Any other references you may have included in your annotations for whatever reason need to be placed in a standard APA (7th ed.) end-text reference list. All the journal article citations above each annotation should be formatted in full APA (7th ed.) end-text reference list format (e.g., citations in hanging indent and alphabetical order down the page, correct capitalisation and punctuation etc.). http://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/documents/default.aspx?record=WD16%2f19524&dbid=AP&chksum=R5Pkrn8yVpb9bJvtpTRe8w%3d%3d https://www.paramedicineboard.gov.au/documents/default.aspx?record=WD18%2f25722&dbid=AP&chksum=%2f9g7tYkjGpdcbjmecZhbzA%3d%3d NURS3001 Sem 1 2020 ‐ Annotated Bibliography 3 Do I need a cover page / title page / contents page for the annotated bibliography? Please do not include an assessment cover page / title page / contents page for this assessment. Do not attach the marking rubric, assessment guide, or plagiarism checklist. These pages adversely influence the Turnitin report. What is included in the annotated bibliography 2000- word limit (+/-10%) and what is the penalty if I go over? The word limit of 2000 words (+/- 10%) refers only the annotations themselves and NOT to the APA citations above your annotations and any in-text references included. There should be four annotations, therefore, each annotation should be around 500 words each