Case Report ‘‘The Mind Is Its Own Place’’: Amelioration of Claustrophobia in Semantic Dementia Camilla N. Clark,1 Laura E. Downey,1 Hannah L. Golden,1 Phillip D. Fletcher,1 Rajith de Silva,2 Alberto...

1 answer below »

https://kccd.instructure.com/courses/50235/assignments/1008280


Case Report ‘‘The Mind Is Its Own Place’’: Amelioration of Claustrophobia in Semantic Dementia Camilla N. Clark,1 Laura E. Downey,1 Hannah L. Golden,1 Phillip D. Fletcher,1 Rajith de Silva,2 Alberto Cifelli,2 and Jason D. Warren1 1 Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, 8-11 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK 2 Essex Neurosciences Centre, Queen’s Hospital, Rom Valley Way, Romford RM7 0AG, UK Correspondence should be addressed to Jason D. Warren; [email protected] Received 1 March 2013; Accepted 17 June 2013; Published 6 March 2014 Academic Editor: Argye E. Hillis Copyright © 2014 Camilla N. Clark et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Phobias are among the few intensely fearful experiences we regularly have in our everyday lives, yet the brain basis of phobic responses remains incompletely understood. Here we describe the case of a 71-year-old patient with a typical clinicoanatomical syndrome of semantic dementia led by selective (predominantly right-sided) temporal lobe atrophy, who showed striking amelioration of previously disabling claustrophobia following onset of her cognitive syndrome.We interpret our patient’s newfound fearlessness as an interaction of damaged limbic and autonomic responsivity with loss of the cognitive meaning of previously threatening situations. This case has implications for our understanding of brain network disintegration in semantic dementia and the neurocognitive basis of phobias more generally. 1. Introduction Specific phobia is defined in DSM-IVR as marked, persistent, and excessive or unreasonable fear when in the presence of, or when anticipating an encounter with, a specific object or situation [1]. Examples of specific phobias include ani- mals (commonly mice, snakes, and spiders), natural envi- ronments (including heights, storms, or water), breaches of one’s physical integrity (blood, injections and injury) and situations (notably, closed spaces or claustrophobia). Specific phobias are collectively common, with an estimated lifetime prevalence of around 10% in Western populations [1]. As rare instances of powerfully arousing, intensely fearful stimuli that are regularly encountered in modern developed societies, phobias hold potentially unique insights for our understanding of the cognitive and neural machinery of fear. Functional imaging in human subjects suggests that specific phobias are neuroanatomically mediated by limbic and paralimbic circuitry including the amygdala, anterior cingulate, insula and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and subcortical connections to the ventral striatumandbrainstem nuclei including locus coeruleus [2–6]. These brain regions are involved in the representation and interpretation of the phobic object, in amplification of the phobic response, and generation of the characteristic somatic correlates of extreme fear. Proximity of the phobic stimulus modulates activation in stria terminalis and orbitofrontal cortex, while mismatch between predicted and experienced fear engages the amygdala [2]. Supraliminally presented stimuli activate amygdala bilaterally whereas subliminally presented stim- uli demonstrate lateralised activity in the right amygdala suggesting a role of the latter in hypervigilance to phobic stimuli before these attain conscious awareness [4]. The role of the amygdala is further underlined by the unique Urbach- Wiethe syndrome in which selective amygdalar proteinosis is accompanied by loss of fear responses [7]. Particular phobias vary in the extent to which they engage cognitive and autonomic components of the fear response [8, 9]. The frontotemporal lobar degenerations (FTLD) are a diverse group of proteinopathies that present clinically with impairments of social conduct and understanding, aphasias or deficits of conceptual knowledge about the world at large [10]. These diseases share a propensity to produce selective brain network disintegration maximally affecting the frontal Hindawi Publishing Corporation Behavioural Neurology Volume 2014, Article ID 584893, 5 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/584893 2 Behavioural Neurology and anterior temporal lobes [10]. Abnormal reactivity to and comprehension of a range of emotional stimuli are a hallmark of FTLD and in particular the canonical syndromic subtypes of behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia (SemD). These deficits of emotion processing have been linked to regional atrophy and altered connectivity in frontolimbic circuitry, including orbitofrontal cortex, ventral striatum, insula, and amygdala [10–12]. The SemD syndrome is of particular interest because it is under- pinned by selective erosion of semantic memory: the human memory system that governs conceptual and encyclopaedic knowledge about words and objects based on an individual’s accumulated experience of the world. SemD is associated with progressive degeneration of a specific brain network centred on the anterior temporal lobes and their connections with inferior frontal, limbic, andmore posterior brain regions [13]. SemD is most often led by loss of understanding of word meanings (progressive semantic aphasia) but less commonly can be led by deficits of nonverbal semantic memory, such as impaired face recognition (progressive associative prosopag- nosia) [14]. Even in patients presenting with verbal semantic deficits, nonverbal semantic deficits are often detectable [15], and both verbal and nonverbal deficits progress as SemD unfolds, underlining the status of this syndrome as the paradigmatic disorder of the semantic memory system. It is increasingly recognised that SemD is associated with a range of behavioural disturbances that may be at least partly underpinned by severe deficits in comprehending affect- laden as well as affectively neutral objects and social concepts [12, 16, 17]. Here we describe the case of a patient in whom develop- ment of SemD was accompanied by striking attenuation of previously disabling claustrophobia, with implications both for our understanding of the pathophysiology of SemD and the brain basis of specific phobias. 2. General Clinical Details This 71-year-old right-handed retired medical secretary, LC, presented with a seven-year history of cognitive decline led by progressive difficulty recognising familiar faces. More recently she had been unable to recognise even close friends and relatives and increasingly relied on other cues to their personal identity (e.g., the type of car they drove). She had also experienced difficulty recognising voices over the telephone. Word finding difficulties were an early feature and she struggled in particular to retrieve personal and brand names. Increasingly she seemed unable to understand how to use everyday household items or to comprehend environmental sounds. Her family had noted an insidious change in her personality and social behaviour beginning around three years after the onset of prosopagnosia and characterised by development of a sweet tooth, reduced empathy, loss of humour and social sensitivity, and increasing self-centredness, with obsessionality around time-keeping, picture puzzles, and music. There was no history of topo- graphical disorientation. There was a past history of severe Figure 1: Representative coronal slice through the anterior temporal lobes from brain MRI in LC, six years after onset of symptoms (the right hemisphere is displayed on the left). There is selective atrophy of the anteroinferior and mesial temporal lobes including amygdalae and hippocampi (more marked on the right) and less marked atrophy of perisylvian cortices bilaterally. claustrophobia with previous psychiatric contact but no other significant past personal or family history. Neuropsychological assessment (summarised in Table 1) corroborated the clinical impression: LC showed deficits of famous face recognition and visual object identification, anomia, and reduced single word comprehension, but her speech was fluent and normally constructed and there was relative preservation of her mnestic, perceptual and exec- utive functions. The general neurological examination was unremarkable. BrainMRI (Figure 1) showed selective atrophy predominantly affecting the anteroinferior and mesial tem- poral lobes, more marked in the right hemisphere, with less marked atrophy of perisylvian cortices bilaterally. Based on LC’s characteristic neuropsychological and neuroanatomical phenotype, a clinical diagnosis of SemD presenting with progressive prosopagnosia was made. This clinical diagnosis was additionally in linewith current consensus criteria for the semantic variant of progressive aphasia, acknowledging that a minority of patients in this group do present with prominent difficulties with person recognition [13]. 3. Alterations in Claustrophobia and Other Emotional Responses A noteworthy feature of LC’s history was striking attenuation of her previously disabling, longstanding claustrophobia fol- lowing the onset of cognitive decline. She had been diagnosed by a psychiatrist with claustrophobia in her mid-twenties, and this had remained a significant issue throughout her adult life. Even in childhood, she had disliked being in crowded places such as the school chapel, and in her late teens and early twenties she exhibited mounting anxiety when in confined spaces including lifts, trains, aeroplanes, and other situations with no obvious route of escape. She would develop full-blown panic symptoms with sustained exposure to such situations and avoided them wherever possible, sometimes at the cost of considerable inconvenience (e.g., driving many kilometres out of her way to avoid road Behavioural Neurology 3 Table 1: Neuropsychological profile of LC 6 years after onset of symptoms. Cognitive domain Raw score Percentile ∗ /normal range† General intellect (WASI) Verbal IQ 84 Performance IQ 93 Executive function Stroop test: colour-word inhibition 60 s 25–50th WMS-R Digit Span: Forwards 9/12Max: 7 50th–75th Backwards 9/12Max: 6 90th–95th Episodic memory Visual recognition: Faces 39/50 10th Words 27/50 5th Language Graded Naming Test 0/30 <1st synonyms:="" concrete="" 18/25=""><2nd abstract="" 16/25=""><2nd british="" picture="" vocabulary="" scale="" (bpvs)="" 136/150="">144/150 † Pyramids and palm trees—pictures 45/52 <5th reading="" (nart)="" 27/50="" n/a="" semantic="" memory:="" faces="" famous="" faces:="" recognition="" 7/12=""><10th‡ famous="" faces:="" naming="" 2/12=""><5th† visual="" perceptual="" object="" decision="" vosp="" 16="" 5–25th="" incomplete="" letters="" 20/20="">99th Position discrimination 20/20 >99th ∗As applicable using WASI: Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence [18]; Stroop, Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System Stroop Test [19]; Recognition Memory Tests [20]; GNT: Graded Naming Test [21]; Concrete and Abstract Word Synonym Test [22]; BPVS: British Picture Vocabulary Scale [23]; Pyramids and Palm Trees Test [24]; NART: National Adult Reading Test [25]; VOSP: Visual Object and Space Perception Battery [26]. †Based on normative data from an historical group of 100 healthy controls aged 55–70 years [27]. ‡Local unpublished normative data from 310 controls aged 55–70 years. tunnels or planning vacations around her fear). There had been no suggestion of a generalised anxiety disorder nor any history of other phobic responses. Her family reported that LC’s claustrophobia settled within several years of onset of her cognitive symptoms: she would, for example, now travel willingly on the London Underground and enter crowded lifts when accessing the platforms. A compelling illustration occurred some six years following symptom onset, when she agreed to have a brain MRI and underwent the procedure with no evidence of distress. Indeed, her family remarked that loss of her claustrophobia was the one positive outcome of LC’s SemD diagnosis. On specific enquiry, there was the suggestion of a more general alteration in LC’s emotional responses. In earlier life she had been prone to fairly regular vociferous, angry outbursts; these had abated following the onset of cognitive decline. In addition, she now failed to react to situations likely to have provoked disgust premorbidly (e.g., leaving her washing machine filled with stagnant water and accu- mulating cartons of mouldy food in her house). In contrast to this reduction in certain strong premorbid emotional responses, LC had developed a craving for music (musi- cophilia), repeatedly requesting to hear the same repertoire of songs derived from Hollywood musicals. She evidently derived considerable pleasure from these songs and, before her family
Answered Same DayMar 15, 2021

Answer To: Case Report ‘‘The Mind Is Its Own Place’’: Amelioration of Claustrophobia in Semantic Dementia...

Sunabh answered on Mar 15 2021
131 Votes
Running Head: Academic Writing        1
Academic Writing        6
Name:
Professor:
Course:
Date:
Title:
Contents
Moral of the Story "The Door" By E.B. White    3
Goth
ic Elements Identified From the Story    4
Using Gothic Elements to Criticize the Society    4
Works Cited    6
Moral of the Story "The Door" By E.B. White
‘The Door’ is a marvelous piece written by E.B. White. It is a very short story and it could be considered as the subject of long essays concerning analysis and criticism. Further, the story can be very strange as well as confusing for certain individuals; however, it reflects upon the futility of trying to be in charge of your life especially when individuals want to run away from modern existence. Therefore, individuals are presented as rats in cage, which are reacting to the stimuli created by other individuals or groups who are actually in control.
White opened up the story with claustrophobic confines of an individual’s brain. Men feel alienated because of his surroundings and lives within the dilemma whether the unease is derived from being in the city or building the city. In other words, this story draws a comparison between modern man and an experimental laboratory rat (Clark et al.). Therefore, humans from this technological world are similar to rats, which are drawn to behave in controlled ways in order to suffer first and later get their needs fulfilled.
Likewise, the story also presents that going crazy might not be so bad because the world made individuals to think about every aspect of life and the ways, in which it might affect human life. Moreover, this story...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here