https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/apr/17/we-feel-abandoned-international-students-in-australia-facing-coronavirus-alone...

i already find the article


https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/apr/17/we-feel-abandoned-international-students-in-australia-facing-coronavirus-alone https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy-b.deakin.edu.au/lib/deakin/reader.action?docID=1056129 https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy-b.deakin.edu.au/lib/deakin/reader.action?docID=1782805 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5ccbJcqlUo all the article needs in the assessment STUDENT NAME This annotated bibliography & critical analysis was completed using 'slightly' different instructions than the ones you will use - but its structure & style are correct. Part 1 – find a news media article or social media post about a controversial issue • A screenshot of the title (including date); • The full bibliographic details for the news article or social media post in Harvard style; • Two to three sentences that explain the issue underlying the article/post. Part 2 – Annotated Bibliography (800 words equivalent): Kennon, P 2009, ‘Yes being a survivor of domestic abuse’, mzsadiemae43, Twitter, 12 March, retrieved 28 March 2019, . This tweet is a response to the original tweet of Joe Biden. The aim of it is to express the support to the idea of the original tweet, which emphasizes the prominence of VAWA (Violence Against Women Act), a federal law to end violence and provide protection for women. The author implies facts about the danger with which women cope in society. In view of these facts, it is essential that women are protected by the government and have grounds to facilitate their rights. Also, given the fact that the author herself is a survivor of domestic abuse, her agreement with the problem’s solution proposed by Joe Biden in the original tweet has remarkably been bolstered. This tweet will contribute to my research as it provides an example of framing effects. To put it another way, my research will show how perception and personal experience of an audience is structured and recalled by the framing technique used in the original tweet. STUDENT NAME Scheufele, DA 2000, ‘Agenda-Setting, Priming, and Framing Revisited: Another Look at Cognitive Effects of Political Communication’, Mass Communication & Society, vol.3, no.2, pp. 297-316, doi: 10.1207/S15327825MCS0323_07 This article is aimed at defining media effects theory and distinguishing 3 salient types of media effects which are agenda-setting, priming, and framing. To the author, acknowledging the conceptual differences between these types of media effects are prominent to further examine how each type contributes to the audience’s message absorbing process. Agenda-setting and Priming are presented by “Salience” premise while Framing, which constitutes social norms and pragmatic practices, is based on “Attribution” premise. The article also states that agenda-setting and priming are directed towards an objective to tell readers what to think about, thus activating memory association of message receivers. Meanwhile, framing sheds light on the most prominent aspects of an issue and structures ways to interpret it. Framing is based on “primary frameworks”, a term used to illustrate schemes of people’s message interpretation, which encompasses 2 categories: natural and societal frames. The former is used to interpret the natural events whilst the latter is to help “locate, perceive, identify and label” (Goffman,1974, p.21) human’s behaviour. By and large, the article discusses the theoretical differences of 3 types of media effects and highlights the distinctiveness and effectiveness of framing. More research is required to analyse framing effects in different political and social contexts, thus probing the prevailing practices of framing used by media influencers. This article will contribute to my research as it distinguishes framing from the other types of media effects while illustrating a salient distinction in the individual-level impact of these 3 types on shaping perception. How Framing Effects Guide Decisions 2016, film, The Great Courses, San Francisco. This video is aimed at analysing people’s interpretation of information when being presented with opinion frames. In the talk, the speaker mentions fundamental theories and features of framing effects; For instance, 3 prominent types of framing effects which are status quo, gain/loss, and opportunity cost neglect are postulated. While status quo framing is based on people’s tendency to prefer options framed as status quo or default options, gain/loss framing implies that losses, more than gains, evoke greater reactions of people. Meanwhile, the other framing type refers to a consideration of “opportunity costs”, a defined term as the loss of other alternatives when one alternative is chosen. By investigating these types of framing effects, the meaning and mechanisms of framing are elucidated, indicating that framing does not alter the innate features of information but rather interpret it by way of shaping receivers’ perception. This video also accentuates on the framing’s salience in economic and social grounds considering its potency of affecting one’s mind. STUDENT NAME This video enhances my knowledge of framing effects and its use in various contexts by influencers and decision makers. Paulas, R 2017, ‘HOW DOES TWITTER INFLUENCE THE WAY WE COMMUNICATE?’, Pacific Standard, 17 February, retrieved 28 March 2019, . This article aims to scrutinize features and effects of Twitter, a model of social media. In order to understand how people communicate and interpret information through social media, the author delineates 8 features of Twitter and their influences on people’s perception. These features contribute to the process of analysing cognitive control and response inhibition, the premise for the research on decision-making behaviour when it comes to social media. The author also exemplifies the interactions and communication through social media between public figures such as the president of the United States and the audience. Evidently, social media has concurrently become a reliable communicative tool for media influencers to disseminate message and structure its approach to the audience. The ideas discussed in this article will pave the way for further research on social media as a prevailing communicative tool and its importance to media influencers. Part 3 – Critical Analysis (400 words +/- 10%) The aim of my research is to elaborate on how media effects theory, the theoretical perspective that delineates the influences of media on the audiences, is used to understand the practices of framing and social media in communication. My research is composed of three main parts; the first part is to compare framing to other types of media effects and discuss framing effects evidenced in the tweet. The theory of media effects encompasses three salient models: Agenda-setting, priming, and framing. Among these models, framing is regarded as a more comprehensive model that records to a higher degree the extent to which the perception of audiences is affected. According to Michael et al. (2016), in order to understand framing, we need to analyse its mechanisms and effects compared with that of agenda-setting and priming. Understanding the differences between these types of media effects will show the intended purpose of information senders when using framing as opposed to other models of media effects to confront the audience. For instance, in the tweet framing is evidenced in the statement “Nothing is more urgent than…women safer”, which a i m s STUDENT NAME to emphasize the issue’s salience and underline a directed solution to the issue. The second part of my research is to elaborate on the reasons why many media influencers or public figures use the framing technique to disseminate information or discuss a problem. These reasons could be analysed based on the scope of media effects and people’s tendency to be more attracted to directed rather than self-interpretive information. Also, the audience’s opinions are mercurial and susceptible to the influences of the framing of the information. Hence media influencers can use framing to achieve a certain level of influence. The last part of my paper is the discussion of social media being used as a tool to propagate messages. In this part, features and effects of social media will be elucidated in order to support the idea that delivering information through social media might be more effective than through other forms of communication. Moreover, I will expand on my assumption that social media is of pivotal importance to both information senders and receivers as it facilitates communication between these 2 groups. By and large, my research will evaluate the models of media effects theory and postulate an accentuation of the practices of framing within social media, supported with evidence from the original tweet. Reference list: Goffman, E 1974, Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Cacciatore, MA, Scheufele, DA & Iyengar, S 2016, ‘The End of Framing as we Know it…and the Future of Media Effects’, Mass Communication and Society, vol.19, no.1, pp. 7-23, doi: 10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811 https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/apr/17/we-feel-abandoned-international-students-in-australia-facing-coronavirus-alone https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy-b.deakin.edu.au/lib/deakin/reader.action?docID=1056129 https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy-b.deakin.edu.au/lib/deakin/reader.action?docID=1782805 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5ccbJcqlUo all the article needs in the assessment Skills Audit Your skills describe your ability to do something well. In addition, it’s also important to consider what you like to do. Most jobs require both technical skills (such as those related to a specific profession or industry) and soft skills which are generic and of broader value (such as communication and team work). You can develop skills through a wide variety of experiences, but only you can decide if you will enjoy using that skill. The below skills audit will help you assess your level of ability in a range of skills and identify those you enjoy. It will also help identify any skills gaps you have for you to work on in the future. I enjoy I don’t enjoy Skill (see below for definitions) I have no ability I have some ability I have strong ability yes Adaptability yes Agility no Analysis no Attention to detail yes Building relationships yes Communication yes Conflict resolution yes Continuous improvement yes Creativity/Innovation no Critical thinking yes Customer service no Decision making no Delegation no Digital literacy no Emotional Intelligence