I attached a file. The assignment is to complete the SOAP note worksheet and extra credit based on Group D task 1.
041322-SOAP Note assignment Deandra Procassini SLHS 407: SOAP Assignment-10 points posted April 13, 2022 due Friday April 22 9:00 am (note date extension) This individual assignment is designed to increase your skill in writing an abbreviated, professional SOAP note. For each group of student names, choose 1 of the 2 Tasks. Use the raw data in the data table and provided key components to create a Step in the Task Sequence and a data statement (O), comparative data statement and additional analysis (A) and a appropriate plan (P). Use the SOAP format on the last page for your assignment. An extra credit opportunity of up to 5 points is optional. Instructions: 1). Use the correct format for a SOAP note based on examples and class discussion. 2). Use strong clinical writing, with correct grammar and spelling. Up to .5 point (from the total score) may be deducted for errors to mechanics or grammar. 3). Create a client name and an age that might be reasonable. 4). Create one “S” based on what might be appropriate for the client’s age or function given the information in provided data. This is at your discretion. 5). Write and include a TS Step that aligns with the task you choose. You have been provided 2 sets of data which reflect the client's performance today (4/13) and last session (4/11). 6). Create an ”O” which documents client performance for today’s data (4/13), as indicated. 7). Create an “A” which will include comparison to the previous session’s performance (4/11) and any relevant analysis of today’s performance. For each set of assigned data, you will need to write an accurate “A” statement to reflect if the performance has: ● increased, or increased with criteria met; advance task ● decreased, or decreased with criteria met; advance task ● remained consistent; (consider if criteria was met to advance task) ● is compared to (todays session is the FIRST session a more advanced tep) 8). Create a “P” for the next session, based on today’s performance and comparison from the previous session’s performance. This will need to reflect: ● Continuation of task ● Advancement of task (If you need to advance the task, make sure the “P” is generally reasonable). Group D: Nguyen, Thuy-Yanonis Task 1 Today, Wednesday 4/13/22: ● Respond to Where question: written 2 sentence stimulus, answer a verbally presented Where question, __/10 trials, independently Last session, Monday 4/11/22: ● Respond to Where question: written 2-sentence stimulus, answer a verbally presented Where question, __/10 trials, independently Scoring/Grading Rubric (max 10 points) I - + - + + - + - - + GC + + - + + VC + I + - + + - - - + + + GC + - + + VC + Section Points possible: S-1 1 pt Subjective information is relevant to support any remarkable decreases or increases in performance OR is noted as client was timely, attentive and participated well in session. Behaviors are logically interpreted, or are directly observed or stated by the client .5 pts Subjective information is occasionally or partially relevant. O-3 3 pts Data statement contains no more than 2 errors. 2 pts Data statement contains 3 errors to presentation of performance, per data table. 1 pt Data statement contains 4+ errors to presentation of performance, per data table Extra credit option (up to 5 points) For one of your tasks from today’s session, in bullet form, describe the presentation of how this session might be structured for the first 5 trials. Include the following: a. introduce and present the stimulus as though you are the clinician b. reflect the client’s correct or error response (per the data table), c. how you might present the cue or cues (as needed per each of the 5 trials) d. how you might respond to/reinforce the client’s correct response. Example: 1. a. Here we go. Tell me what you see in this picture. b. Client response: “rilla” c. That was close. Try it again using all 3 syllable (VC) d. You got it! You said all the pieces of that word. Nice job! 2. (follow format above). A-4 4 pts Comparison of performance contains no more than 2 errors. Any additional analysis of performance is generally appropriate. 3 pts Comparison of performance contains no more than 3 errors or omissions. Any additional analysis of performance is generally appropriate. 2 pts Comparison of performance contains 4+ errors or omissions. Any additional analysis of performance is generally appropriate. P-2 2 pts Plan for the next session contains no more than 1 error; includes a verb statement with observable performance containing task complexity, stimulus/activity and cues. 1 pt Plan for the next session contains 2 errors or omissions .5 pts Plan for the next session contains 3+ error or omissions CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY EAST BAY DEPARTMENT OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING SCIENCES NORMA S. AND RAY R. REES SPEECH, LANGUAGE AND HEARING CLINIC Therapy Note TO #1 Step ___: Student Clinician: _Deandra Procassini________________ Clinical Supervisor: _Jenny Rosenquist_______________ OPTIONAL Extra Credit Client: Axel V. Client Age: Session #: Report Date: Diagnosis: S: Objective: Assessment : Plan: